| Literature DB >> 23341718 |
Ki Moo Lim1, Jeong Sang Lee, Min-Soo Gyeong, Jae-Sung Choi, Seong Wook Choi, Eun Bo Shim.
Abstract
To quantify the reduction in workload during intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy, indirect parameters are used, such as the mean arterial pressure during diastole, product of heart rate and peak systolic pressure, and pressure-volume area. Therefore, we investigated the cardiac energy consumption during IABP therapy using a cardiac electromechanics model. We incorporated an IABP function into a previously developed electromechanical model of the ventricle with a lumped model of the circulatory system and investigated the cardiac energy consumption at different IABP inflation volumes. When the IABP was used at inflation level 5, the cardiac output and stroke volume increased 11%, the ejection fraction increased 21%, the stroke work decreased 1%, the mean arterial pressure increased 10%, and the ATP consumption decreased 12%. These results show that although the ATP consumption is decreased significantly, stroke work is decreased only slightly, which indicates that the IABP helps the failed ventricle to pump blood efficiently.Entities:
Keywords: ATP Consumption; Cardiac Electromechanics Model; Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump; Stroke Work
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23341718 PMCID: PMC3546111 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.1.93
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the finite-element ventricular electromechanical model coupled with the circulatory model (A). P, RV pressure; V, RV volume; P, LV pressure; V, LV volume; R, pulmonary artery resistance; C, pulmonary artery compliance; R, pulmonary vein resistance; C, pulmonary vein compliance; R, mitral valve resistance; C, left atrium compliance; R, aortic valve resistance; R, systemic artery resistance, R, the resistance of IABP-implanted systemic arteries; C, systemic artery compliance; R, systemic vein resistance; C, systemic vein compliance; R, tricuspid valve resistance; C, right atrium compliance; and R, pulmonary valve resistance. C is calculated as the product of C and a scale factor for the IABP effects.
Fig. 2Electrical activation time mapped to mechanical component of ventricular computational mesh. The activation time is defined as the instant at which transmembrane voltage exceeds 0 mV. EAT indicates electrical activation time.
Flow, stroke volume, ejection fraction, pulse efficiency for failure and pathological model according to the compliance change
Fig. 3Simulated pressure waveform in the LV and systemic artery. HF without IABP support (A), and HF with the IABP operating at levels 1 (B), 2 (C), 3 (D), 4 (E), and 5 (F).
Hemodynamic responses for HF and HF with the IABP according to the compliance change
IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; CO, cardiac output; SV, stroke volume; SW, stroke work; LVPP, left ventricular peak pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; EF, ejection fraction.
Fig. 4Transmural distribution of the ATP consumption rate. Heart failure ventricles without IABP support (A) and with IABP support at level 5 (B).
Fig. 5Transmural distribution of the mechanical strain. Heart failure ventricles without IABP support (A) and with IABP support at level 5 (B).
Fig. 6The pressure-volume curves for the six cases studied. Heart failure without IABP therapy, and HF with the IABP at levels 1 to 5.