| Literature DB >> 33329041 |
Da Un Jeong1, Ki Moo Lim1,2.
Abstract
In ventricular tachyarrhythmia, electrical instability features including action potential duration, dominant frequency, phase singularity, and filaments are associated with mechanical contractility. However, there are insufficient studies on estimated mechanical contractility based on electrical features during ventricular tachyarrhythmia using a stochastic model. In this study, we predicted cardiac mechanical performance from features of electrical instability during ventricular tachyarrhythmia simulation using machine learning algorithms, including support vector regression (SVR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models. We performed an electromechanical tachyarrhythmia simulation and extracted 12 electrical instability features and two mechanical properties, including stroke volume and the amplitude of myocardial tension (ampTens). We compared predictive performance according to kernel types of the SVR model and the number of hidden layers of the ANN model. In the SVR model, the prediction accuracies of stroke volume and ampTens were the highest when using the polynomial kernel and linear kernel, respectively. The predictive performance of the ANN model was better than that of the SVR model. The prediction accuracies were the highest when the ANN model consisted of three hidden layers. Accordingly, we propose the ANN model with three hidden layers as an optimal model for predicting cardiac mechanical contractility in ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The results of this study are expected to be used to indirectly estimate the hemodynamic response from the electrical cardiac map measured by the optical mapping system during cardiac surgery, as well as cardiac contractility under normal sinus rhythm conditions.Entities:
Keywords: artificial neural network; computational study; electrical instability; mechanical performance; support vector regression; ventricular tachyarrhythmia
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329041 PMCID: PMC7732497 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.591681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Schematic of the electromechanical model with implementation of one-way coupling in the cardiac excitation-contraction mechanism. The left side of the circuit diagram depicts a human electrophysiological ventricular model, which consists of 619,360 nodes and 3,439,590 tetrahedron elements. The electrical components of the schematic represent the current, pump, and ion exchanger from Ten Tusscher et al. (2009), which emulate the cell membrane for ion transport and the sarcoplasmic reticulum within cardiac cells. “I” is the ion currents, and “E” is the equilibrium potential of each ion; the right side depicts a human mechanical ventricular model, which is consists of 14,720 nodes and 6,210 hexahedron elements. The mechanical components represent excitation-contraction mechanism through cross-bridge of myofilaments from Rice et al. (2008) Conformations of a regulatory protein represent as non-permissive (N) and permissive (P), and the state of the myosin is denoted as XB of the pro-rotated state and XB of post-rotated state. g, h, and h are the rate of the ATP-consuming detachment transition, the forward transition and, the backward transition, respectively. f refers to the cross-bridge attachment rate of the changeover to the first strongly bound state, and g refers to its reverse rate. K and K denote transition rates; K(TCa)7.5 and K(TCa)−7.5 are the transition rates of the nonpermissive to permissive (forward) and the permissive to non-permissive (backward), respectively. The mechanical model is combined with the circulatory model using the coupling method suggested by Gurev et al. (2011) “R” and “C” are the resistance and compliance of the cardiac circulatory system, respectively (For more details, see the text).
Extracted features and outputs.
| Features | Definitions | Average | Max | Median | Min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APD | Action potential duration (ms) | 121.5 | 43.4 | 237 | 111 | 69 |
| Wavelength | Length of propagating wave (cm) | 8.4 | 3.0 | 16.2 | 7.6 | 4.8 |
| Rotation_rate | Rotational speed of reentrant wave (cm/s) | 5.7 | 1.1 | 7.3 | 5.6 | 3.4 |
| DF_mean | Mean dominant frequency on the ventricular mesh (Hz) | 5.7 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 3.5 |
| DF_std | Standard deviation of dominant frequency on the ventricular mesh (Hz) | 0.1 | 4.6E-2 | 0.3 | 9.7E-02 | 1.1E-03 |
| DF_peakP_mean | Mean of power spectral density at dominant frequency | 0.1E-03 | 4.6E-05 | 0.2E-04 | 1.1E-04 | 4.5E-07 |
| DF_peakP_std | Standard deviation of power spectral density at dominant frequency | 2.1E-05 | 2.5E-05 | 2.7E-04 | 1.7E-05 | 3.4E-08 |
| PS | Average number of phase singularities | 48 | 28 | 119 | 48 | 5 |
| PS_std | Standard deviation of number of phase singularities | 8.0 | 6.1 | 47.3 | 7.2 | 1.0 |
| Filament | Average number of filaments | 13,782 | 19,321 | 138,142 | 9,648 | 413 |
| Filament_std | Standard deviation of number of filaments | 4,339.4 | 5,590.4 | 38,546.6 | 2,563 | 276.8 |
| Filament/PS | Ratio of the average number of phase singularities to the average number of filaments (Length of filament) | 252.5 | 232 | 1,428 | 192 | 85 |
| Outputs | Definitions | Average | SD | Max | Median | Min |
| SV (mL) | Average stroke volume during meaningful periods | 0.3 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0 |
| Tension-SD (kPa) | Average of amplitude of myocardial tension during the ventricular tachyarrhythmia | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 4.1E-02 |
Figure 2Mean squared error of the regression models. (A) The prediction performances of stroke volume and (B) myocardial tension using support vector regression (SVR) models and artificial neural network (ANN) models; SVR models have a linear kernel, polynomial kernel, and RBF kernel; the number of hidden layers (HL) in the ANN model increases from 1 to 3.
Figure 3Accuracies of SVR models. Accuracies of stroke volume (SV) prediction using SVR with linear (A), polynomial (B), and RBF kernels (C). Accuracies of myocardial tension (ampTens) prediction using SVR with linear (D), polynomial (E), and RBF kernels (F), respectively.
Figure 4Accuracies of ANN regression models. Accuracies of stroke volume (SV) prediction using ANN models with one (A), two (B), and three (C) hidden layers. Accuracies of myocardial tension (ampTens) prediction using ANN with one (D), two (E), and three (F) hidden layers.