PURPOSE: Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-mIBG) scintigraphy is an established imaging method in neuroblastoma. Semiquantitative scoring systems have been developed to assess the extent of disease and response to chemotherapy. We present the results of the comparison between the SIOPEN [International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group] score and the modified Curie score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 mIBG scans of 58 patients older than 1 year of age with stage 4 neuroblastoma from German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97 that were assessed according to the SIOPEN and the Curie scoring method. mIBG examinations were performed at diagnosis and after four and six cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Scoring results were highly correlated between both methods, and interobserver reliability was excellent. A Curie score ≤ 2 and a SIOPEN score ≤ 4 (best cutoff) at diagnosis were correlated to significantly better event-free and overall survival compared with higher scores. After four cycles of chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly better for mIBG-negative patients compared with those with any residual mIBG-positive metastases. After six cycles of chemotherapy, there was no difference in survival between mIBG-negative patients and patients with residual mIBG-positive metastases. Patients without mIBG-positive metastases after four and six cycles of chemotherapy had a better overall survival, but late clearance of mIBG-positive metastases did not improve outcome. CONCLUSION: Higher mIBG scores at diagnosis and occurrence of any residual mIBG-positive metastases after four cycles of chemotherapy predicted unfavorable outcome for patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma. Later clearance of metastases did not improve prognosis. The Curie and the SIOPEN score were equally reliable and predictive.
PURPOSE: Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-mIBG) scintigraphy is an established imaging method in neuroblastoma. Semiquantitative scoring systems have been developed to assess the extent of disease and response to chemotherapy. We present the results of the comparison between the SIOPEN [International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group] score and the modified Curie score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 mIBG scans of 58 patients older than 1 year of age with stage 4 neuroblastoma from German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97 that were assessed according to the SIOPEN and the Curie scoring method. mIBG examinations were performed at diagnosis and after four and six cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Scoring results were highly correlated between both methods, and interobserver reliability was excellent. A Curie score ≤ 2 and a SIOPEN score ≤ 4 (best cutoff) at diagnosis were correlated to significantly better event-free and overall survival compared with higher scores. After four cycles of chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly better for mIBG-negative patients compared with those with any residual mIBG-positive metastases. After six cycles of chemotherapy, there was no difference in survival between mIBG-negative patients and patients with residual mIBG-positive metastases. Patients without mIBG-positive metastases after four and six cycles of chemotherapy had a better overall survival, but late clearance of mIBG-positive metastases did not improve outcome. CONCLUSION: Higher mIBG scores at diagnosis and occurrence of any residual mIBG-positive metastases after four cycles of chemotherapy predicted unfavorable outcome for patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma. Later clearance of metastases did not improve prognosis. The Curie and the SIOPEN score were equally reliable and predictive.
Authors: Erin K Barr; Kathryn Laurie; Kristen Wroblewski; Mark A Applebaum; Susan L Cohn Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Pat Zanzonico; Kevin D Staton; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Serge Lyashchenko; Eva Burnazi; Hanwen Zhang; Jason S Lewis; Ronald Blasberg; Steven M Larson; Wolfgang A Weber; Shakeel Modak Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Elizabeth A Sokol; Roger Engelmann; Wenjun Kang; Navin Pinto; Adam Starkey; Hollie Lai; Helen Nadel; Barry L Shulkin; Yonglin Pu; Daniel Appelbaum; Gregory A Yanik; Susan L Cohn; Samuel G Armato; Samuel Volchenboum Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Julie R Park; Rochelle Bagatell; Susan L Cohn; Andrew D Pearson; Judith G Villablanca; Frank Berthold; Susan Burchill; Ariane Boubaker; Kieran McHugh; Jed G Nuchtern; Wendy B London; Nita L Seibel; O Wolf Lindwasser; John M Maris; Penelope Brock; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Ruth Ladenstein; Katherine K Matthay; Dominique Valteau-Couanet Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 44.544