Literature DB >> 23341440

Comparative analysis of targeted differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and human embryonic stem cells reveals variability associated with incomplete transgene silencing in retrovirally derived hiPSC lines.

Sanna Toivonen1, Marisa Ojala, Anu Hyysalo, Tanja Ilmarinen, Kristiina Rajala, Mari Pekkanen-Mattila, Riikka Äänismaa, Karolina Lundin, Jaan Palgi, Jere Weltner, Ras Trokovic, Olli Silvennoinen, Heli Skottman, Susanna Narkilahti, Katriina Aalto-Setälä, Timo Otonkoski.   

Abstract

Functional hepatocytes, cardiomyocytes, neurons, and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) could provide a defined and renewable source of human cells relevant for cell replacement therapies, drug discovery, toxicology testing, and disease modeling. In this study, we investigated the differences between the differentiation potentials of three hESC lines, four retrovirally derived hiPSC lines, and one hiPSC line derived with the nonintegrating Sendai virus technology. Four independent protocols were used for hepatocyte, cardiomyocyte, neuronal, and RPE cell differentiation. Overall, cells differentiated from hESCs and hiPSCs showed functional similarities and similar expression of genes characteristic of specific cell types, and differences between individual cell lines were also detected. Reactivation of transgenic OCT4 was detected specifically during RPE differentiation in the retrovirally derived lines, which may have affected the outcome of differentiation with these hiPSCs. One of the hiPSC lines was inferior in all directions, and it failed to produce hepatocytes. Exogenous KLF4 was incompletely silenced in this cell line. No transgene expression was detected in the Sendai virus-derived hiPSC line. These findings highlight the problems related to transgene expression in retrovirally derived hiPSC lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23341440      PMCID: PMC3659749          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  43 in total

1.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Jacob Hanna; Xiaolan Zhang; Manching Ku; Marius Wernig; Patrick Schorderet; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch; Eric S Lander; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency.

Authors:  Samer M Hussein; Nizar N Batada; Sanna Vuoristo; Reagan W Ching; Reija Autio; Elisa Närvä; Siemon Ng; Michel Sourour; Riikka Hämäläinen; Cia Olsson; Karolina Lundin; Milla Mikkola; Ras Trokovic; Michael Peitz; Oliver Brüstle; David P Bazett-Jones; Kari Alitalo; Riitta Lahesmaa; Andras Nagy; Timo Otonkoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Karim Si-Tayeb; Fallon K Noto; Masato Nagaoka; Jixuan Li; Michele A Battle; Christine Duris; Paula E North; Stephen Dalton; Stephen A Duncan
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Beqqali; Jantine Kloots; Dorien Ward-van Oostwaard; Christine Mummery; Robert Passier
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Matsui; Danny Leung; Hiroki Miyashita; Irina A Maksakova; Hitoshi Miyachi; Hiroshi Kimura; Makoto Tachibana; Matthew C Lorincz; Yoichi Shinkai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  CD marker expression profiles of human embryonic stem cells and their neural derivatives, determined using flow-cytometric analysis, reveal a novel CD marker for exclusion of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Maria Sundberg; Linda Jansson; Johanna Ketolainen; Harri Pihlajamäki; Riitta Suuronen; Heli Skottman; José Inzunza; Outi Hovatta; Susanna Narkilahti
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.020

7.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.

Authors:  J A Thomson; J Itskovitz-Eldor; S S Shapiro; M A Waknitz; J J Swiergiel; V S Marshall; J M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency.

Authors:  Rupa Sridharan; Jason Tchieu; Mike J Mason; Robin Yachechko; Edward Kuoy; Steve Horvath; Qing Zhou; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The effect of human and mouse fibroblast feeder cells on cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Mari Pekkanen-Mattila; Marisa Ojala; Erja Kerkelä; Kristiina Rajala; Heli Skottman; Katriina Aalto-Setälä
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Knut Woltjen; Iacovos P Michael; Paria Mohseni; Ridham Desai; Maria Mileikovsky; Riikka Hämäläinen; Rebecca Cowling; Wei Wang; Pentao Liu; Marina Gertsenstein; Keisuke Kaji; Hoon-Ki Sung; Andras Nagy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  27 in total

1.  New markers for tracking endoderm induction and hepatocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Audrey Holtzinger; Philip R Streeter; Farida Sarangi; Scott Hillborn; Maryam Niapour; Shinichiro Ogawa; Gordon Keller
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Intrastriatal transplantation of adenovirus-generated induced pluripotent stem cells for treating neuropathological and functional deficits in a rodent model of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Kyle D Fink; Andrew T Crane; Xavier Lévêque; Dylan J Dues; Lucas D Huffman; Allison C Moore; Darren T Story; Rachel E Dejonge; Aaron Antcliff; Phillip A Starski; Ming Lu; Laurent Lescaudron; Julien Rossignol; Gary L Dunbar
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Removal of reprogramming transgenes improves the tissue reconstitution potential of keratinocytes generated from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ken Igawa; Chikara Kokubu; Kosuke Yusa; Kyoji Horie; Yasuhide Yoshimura; Kaori Yamauchi; Hirofumi Suemori; Hiroo Yokozeki; Masashi Toyoda; Nobutaka Kiyokawa; Hajime Okita; Yoshitaka Miyagawa; Hidenori Akutsu; Akihiro Umezawa; Ichiro Katayama; Junji Takeda
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  Current focus of stem cell application in retinal repair.

Authors:  María L Alonso-Alonso; Girish K Srivastava
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Advanced feeder-free generation of induced pluripotent stem cells directly from blood cells.

Authors:  Ras Trokovic; Jere Weltner; Ken Nishimura; Manami Ohtaka; Mahito Nakanishi; Veikko Salomaa; Anu Jalanko; Timo Otonkoski; Aija Kyttälä
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  From confluent human iPS cells to self-forming neural retina and retinal pigmented epithelium.

Authors:  Sacha Reichman; Angélique Terray; Amélie Slembrouck; Céline Nanteau; Gaël Orieux; Walter Habeler; Emeline F Nandrot; José-Alain Sahel; Christelle Monville; Olivier Goureau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Application of stem cell-derived retinal pigmented epithelium in retinal degenerative diseases: present and future.

Authors:  Mingyue Luo; Youxin Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelium: A Comparative Study Between Cell Lines and Differentiation Methods.

Authors:  Lyndsay L Leach; Roxanne H Croze; Qirui Hu; Vignesh P Nadar; Tracy N Clevenger; Britney O Pennington; David M Gamm; Dennis O Clegg
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Functional analysis of serially expanded human iPS cell-derived RPE cultures.

Authors:  Ruchira Singh; M Joseph Phillips; David Kuai; Jackelyn Meyer; Jessica M Martin; Molly A Smith; Enio T Perez; Wei Shen; Kyle A Wallace; Elizabeth E Capowski; Lynda S Wright; David M Gamm
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  iPS cell-derived cardiogenicity is hindered by sustained integration of reprogramming transgenes.

Authors:  Almudena Martinez-Fernandez; Timothy J Nelson; Santiago Reyes; Alexey E Alekseev; Frank Secreto; Carmen Perez-Terzic; Rosanna Beraldi; Hoon-Ki Sung; Andras Nagy; Andre Terzic
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2014-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.