BACKGROUND: Reliable closure is a prerequisite for conventional and innovative endoscopic procedures, such as NOTES. The purpose of this study is the systematic evaluation of the procedural and clinical success rates in closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations and acute anastomotic leaks by means of the over-the-scope-clip system (OTSC(®)). DESIGN: PubMed and other sources were searched systematically for clinical and preclinical research on the evaluation of the OTSC System for closure of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks. Appraisal of studies for inclusion and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using an a priori determined data extraction grid. Major endpoints to be extracted were data on procedural success (successful clip application) and clinical access (durable closure of defect without secondary adjunct therapy). RESULTS: A total of 17 clinical research articles/abstracts and 22 preclinical research articles/abstracts were identified. The examined clinical studies comprised case series and clinical single-arm studies. The reviewed studies revealed a consistently high mean rate of procedural success of 80-100 % and durable clinical success of 57-100 %. An identified major drawback preventing successful clip application was occurrence of fibrotic or inflamed lesion edges. Usage of the OTSC System was accompanied by neither major clip-related nor application-related complication. In experimental settings, closure of larger perforations and gastric access sites of NOTES or endoscopic full-thickness resection were achieved with high rates of success. CONCLUSIONS: Because randomized, clinical trials are not available in this field of indication, the evaluation is based on small case series. Nevertheless, by pooling all experience gained, we conclude that endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations and acute anastomotic leaks by means of the OTSC System is a safe and effective method.
BACKGROUND: Reliable closure is a prerequisite for conventional and innovative endoscopic procedures, such as NOTES. The purpose of this study is the systematic evaluation of the procedural and clinical success rates in closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations and acute anastomotic leaks by means of the over-the-scope-clip system (OTSC(®)). DESIGN: PubMed and other sources were searched systematically for clinical and preclinical research on the evaluation of the OTSC System for closure of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks. Appraisal of studies for inclusion and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using an a priori determined data extraction grid. Major endpoints to be extracted were data on procedural success (successful clip application) and clinical access (durable closure of defect without secondary adjunct therapy). RESULTS: A total of 17 clinical research articles/abstracts and 22 preclinical research articles/abstracts were identified. The examined clinical studies comprised case series and clinical single-arm studies. The reviewed studies revealed a consistently high mean rate of procedural success of 80-100 % and durable clinical success of 57-100 %. An identified major drawback preventing successful clip application was occurrence of fibrotic or inflamed lesion edges. Usage of the OTSC System was accompanied by neither major clip-related nor application-related complication. In experimental settings, closure of larger perforations and gastric access sites of NOTES or endoscopic full-thickness resection were achieved with high rates of success. CONCLUSIONS: Because randomized, clinical trials are not available in this field of indication, the evaluation is based on small case series. Nevertheless, by pooling all experience gained, we conclude that endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations and acute anastomotic leaks by means of the OTSC System is a safe and effective method.
Authors: Daniel von Renteln; Thomas Kratt; Thomas Rösch; Ulrike W Denzer; Guido Schachschal Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Thomas Kratt; Markus Küper; Frank Traub; Chi-Nghia Ho; Marc-Oliver Schurr; Alfred Königsrainer; Frank Alexander Granderath; Andreas Kirschniak Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: R Manta; M Manno; H Bertani; C Barbera; F Pigò; V Mirante; E Longinotti; G Bassotti; R Conigliaro Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Rogier P Voermans; Olivier Le Moine; Daniel von Renteln; Thierry Ponchon; Marc Giovannini; Marco Bruno; Bas Weusten; Stefan Seewald; Guido Costamagna; Pierre Deprez; Paul Fockens Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: M Raithel; H Albrecht; W Scheppach; M Farnbacher; W Haupt; A F Hagel; V Schellerer; F Vitali; M F Neurath; H T Schneider Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marc O Schurr; Franziska E Baur; Martina Krautwald; Marion Fehlker; Manfred Wehrmann; Thomas Gottwald; Ruediger L Prosst Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kamron Pourmand; Brian Riff; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nuzhat A Ahmad Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sebastian Schostek; C N Ho; M Melbert; M Krautwald; A Caputo; G Parisi; M Wehrmann; T Gottwald; M O Schurr Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: R Manta; F Tremolaterra; A Arezzo; M Verra; G Galloro; L Dioscoridi; F Pugliese; A Zullo; M Mutignani; G Bassotti Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 3.781