BACKGROUND: DNA methylation serves as an important epigenetic mark in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. In eukaryotes, the most common epigenetic mark is 5-methylcytosine, whereas prokaryotes can have 6-methyladenine, 4-methylcytosine, or 5-methylcytosine. Single-molecule, real-time sequencing is capable of directly detecting all three types of modified bases. However, the kinetic signature of 5-methylcytosine is subtle, which presents a challenge for detection. We investigated whether conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-carboxylcytosine using the enzyme Tet1 would enhance the kinetic signature, thereby improving detection. RESULTS: We characterized the kinetic signatures of various cytosine modifications, demonstrating that 5-carboxylcytosine has a larger impact on the local polymerase rate than 5-methylcytosine. Using Tet1-mediated conversion, we show improved detection of 5-methylcytosine using in vitro methylated templates and apply the method to the characterization of 5-methylcytosine sites in the genomes of Escherichia coli MG1655 and Bacillus halodurans C-125. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a method for the enhancement of directly detecting 5-methylcytosine during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Using Tet1 to convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-carboxylcytosine improves the detection rate of this important epigenetic marker, thereby complementing the set of readily detectable microbial base modifications, and enhancing the ability to interrogate eukaryotic epigenetic markers.
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation serves as an important epigenetic mark in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. In eukaryotes, the most common epigenetic mark is 5-methylcytosine, whereas prokaryotes can have 6-methyladenine, 4-methylcytosine, or 5-methylcytosine. Single-molecule, real-time sequencing is capable of directly detecting all three types of modified bases. However, the kinetic signature of 5-methylcytosine is subtle, which presents a challenge for detection. We investigated whether conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-carboxylcytosine using the enzyme Tet1 would enhance the kinetic signature, thereby improving detection. RESULTS: We characterized the kinetic signatures of various cytosine modifications, demonstrating that 5-carboxylcytosine has a larger impact on the local polymerase rate than 5-methylcytosine. Using Tet1-mediated conversion, we show improved detection of 5-methylcytosine using in vitro methylated templates and apply the method to the characterization of 5-methylcytosine sites in the genomes of Escherichia coli MG1655 and Bacillus halodurans C-125. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a method for the enhancement of directly detecting 5-methylcytosine during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Using Tet1 to convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-carboxylcytosine improves the detection rate of this important epigenetic marker, thereby complementing the set of readily detectable microbial base modifications, and enhancing the ability to interrogate eukaryotic epigenetic markers.
Authors: Martin Krzywinski; Jacqueline Schein; Inanç Birol; Joseph Connors; Randy Gascoyne; Doug Horsman; Steven J Jones; Marco A Marra Journal: Genome Res Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Toni Pfaffeneder; Benjamin Hackner; Matthias Truss; Martin Münzel; Markus Müller; Christian A Deiml; Christian Hagemeier; Thomas Carell Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Ali Bashir; Aaron Klammer; William P Robins; Chen-Shan Chin; Dale Webster; Ellen Paxinos; David Hsu; Meredith Ashby; Susana Wang; Paul Peluso; Robert Sebra; Jon Sorenson; James Bullard; Jackie Yen; Marie Valdovino; Emilia Mollova; Khai Luong; Steven Lin; Brianna LaMay; Amruta Joshi; Lori Rowe; Michael Frace; Cheryl L Tarr; Maryann Turnsek; Brigid M Davis; Andrew Kasarskis; John J Mekalanos; Matthew K Waldor; Eric E Schadt Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Tyson A Clark; Iain A Murray; Richard D Morgan; Andrey O Kislyuk; Kristi E Spittle; Matthew Boitano; Alexey Fomenkov; Richard J Roberts; Jonas Korlach Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sergey Koren; Michael C Schatz; Brian P Walenz; Jeffrey Martin; Jason T Howard; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Zhong Wang; David A Rasko; W Richard McCombie; Erich D Jarvis Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: June E Pais; Nan Dai; Esta Tamanaha; Romualdas Vaisvila; Alexey I Fomenkov; Jurate Bitinaite; Zhiyi Sun; Shengxi Guan; Ivan R Corrêa; Christopher J Noren; Xiaodong Cheng; Richard J Roberts; Yu Zheng; Lana Saleh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jennifer B Kozdon; Michael D Melfi; Khai Luong; Tyson A Clark; Matthew Boitano; Susana Wang; Bo Zhou; Diego Gonzalez; Justine Collier; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach; Lucy Shapiro; Harley H McAdams Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew H Laszlo; Ian M Derrington; Henry Brinkerhoff; Kyle W Langford; Ian C Nova; Jenny Mae Samson; Joshua J Bartlett; Mikhail Pavlenok; Jens H Gundlach Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lukas Chavez; Yun Huang; Khai Luong; Suneet Agarwal; Lakshminarayan M Iyer; William A Pastor; Virginia K Hench; Sylvia A Frazier-Bowers; Evgenia Korol; Shuo Liu; Mamta Tahiliani; Yinsheng Wang; Tyson A Clark; Jonas Korlach; Patricia J Pukkila; L Aravind; Anjana Rao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 11.205