Literature DB >> 23339240

The dynamic relationship between polyandry and selfish genetic elements.

Nina Wedell1.   

Abstract

Selfish genetic elements (SGEs) are ubiquitous in eukaryotes and bacteria, and make up a large part of the genome. They frequently target sperm to increase their transmission success, but these manipulations are often associated with reduced male fertility. Low fertility of SGE-carrying males is suggested to promote polyandry as a female strategy to bias paternity against male carriers. Support for this hypothesis is found in several taxa, where SGE-carrying males have reduced sperm competitive ability. In contrast, when SGEs give rise to reproductive incompatibilities between SGE-carrying males and females, polyandry is not necessarily favoured, irrespective of the detrimental impact on male fertility. This is due to the frequency-dependent nature of these incompatibilities, because they will decrease in the population as the frequency of SGEs increases. However, reduced fertility of SGE-carrying males can prevent the successful population invasion of SGEs. In addition, SGEs can directly influence male and female mating behaviour, mating rates and reproductive traits (e.g. female reproductive tract length and male sperm). This reveals a potent and dynamic interaction between SGEs and polyandry highlighting the potential to generate sexual selection and conflict, but also indicates that polyandry can promote harmony within the genome by undermining the spread of SGEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339240      PMCID: PMC3576583          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  71 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes.

Authors:  Sarah R Pryke; Lee A Rollins; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Polyandry prevents extinction.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Greg D D Hurst; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  "Sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure.

Authors:  D Policansky; J Ellison
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Mammalian mating systems.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-05-22

6.  World-wide survey of an Accord insertion and its association with DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F Catania; M O Kauer; P J Daborn; J L Yen; R H Ffrench-Constant; C Schlotterer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Infectious speciation revisited: impact of symbiont-depletion on female fitness and mating behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Miller; Lee Ehrman; Daniela Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Polyandry and the decrease of a selfish genetic element in a wild house mouse population.

Authors:  Andri Manser; Anna K Lindholm; Barbara König; Homayoun C Bagheri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Male-killing Wolbachia do not protect Drosophila bifasciata against viral infection.

Authors:  Ben Longdon; Daniel K Fabian; Gregory D D Hurst; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  Modification of Insect and Arachnid Behaviours by Vertically Transmitted Endosymbionts: Infections as Drivers of Behavioural Change and Evolutionary Novelty.

Authors:  Sara L Goodacre; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.769

View more
  22 in total

1.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Association of polyandry and sex-ratio drive prevalence in natural populations of Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Cheryl A Pinzone; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Sex chromosome drive.

Authors:  Quentin Helleu; Pierre R Gérard; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Detrimental effects of an autosomal selfish genetic element on sperm competitiveness in house mice.

Authors:  Andreas Sutter; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  X-linked meiotic drive can boost population size and persistence.

Authors:  Carl Mackintosh; Andrew Pomiankowski; Michael F Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.

Authors:  Rudi L Verspoor; Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Fitness consequences of a non-recombining sex-ratio drive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; David W Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Carrying a selfish genetic element predicts increased migration propensity in free-living wild house mice.

Authors:  Jan-Niklas Runge; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.