Literature DB >> 23336459

Understanding diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: qualitative synthesis of significant event audit reports.

Elizabeth D Mitchell1, Greg Rubin, Una Macleod.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most lung cancers present symptomatically, but the pathway to diagnosis in primary care can be complex and is poorly understood. Significant event audit (SEA) is a quality improvement technique widely used in UK general practice. AIM: To gain insights into the diagnostic process for lung cancer, drawn from analysis of SEA documents. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Qualitative analysis of SEAs from 92 general practices in the North of England Cancer Network.
METHOD: Participating practices were provided with a standardised electronic template and asked to undertake a significant event audit related to the most recent diagnosis of lung cancer in the practice, even if that patient had since died. Reported accounts for 132 diagnoses were analysed using a modified framework approach.
RESULTS: Most SEAs demonstrated timely recognition and referral. Where this had taken longer, there were often reasonable explanations, including: chest X-rays reported as normal or with benign findings; patient-mediated factors, such as delay in re-presenting or declining earlier referral; and presentation complicated by comorbidity. Some opportunities for earlier referral were also found. Lessons drawn from these events included limitations of chest X-ray as a diagnostic tool, the need for vigilance in patients with existing morbidity, and the importance of 'safety-netting'.
CONCLUSION: Qualitative synthesis of SEAs offered considerable value in understanding circumstances surrounding the diagnostic process for lung cancer in primary care. The most common presentation was with cough or other symptoms indicative of infection, and it is by understanding more about these patients in particular that most can be gained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23336459      PMCID: PMC3529291          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X660760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  10 in total

1.  Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses.

Authors:  J McKay; D J Murphy; P Bowie; M-L Schmuck; M Lough; K W Eva
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

2.  Diagnostic safety-netting.

Authors:  Susanna Almond; David Mant; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Significant event auditing. A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care.

Authors:  M Pringle; C P Bradley; C M Carmichael; H Wallis; A Moore
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-03

4.  Is late diagnosis of lung cancer inevitable? Interview study of patients' recollections of symptoms before diagnosis.

Authors:  J Corner; J Hopkinson; D Fitzsimmons; S Barclay; M Muers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary.

Authors:  Milena Sant; Claudia Allemani; Mariano Santaquilani; Arnold Knijn; Francesca Marchesi; Riccardo Capocaccia
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Factors contributing to the time taken to consult with symptoms of lung cancer: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S M Smith; N C Campbell; U MacLeod; A J Lee; A Raja; S Wyke; S B Ziebland; E M Duff; L D Ritchie; M C Nicolson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  A retrospective review of significant events reported in one district in 2004-2005.

Authors:  Stephen J Cox; John D Holden
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care.

Authors:  John McKay; Nick Bradley; Murray Lough; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  The National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative in England: assembling the evidence.

Authors:  M A Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England.

Authors:  M A Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  31 in total

Review 1.  Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review.

Authors:  Daniel Jones; Laurie Dunn; Ian Watt; Una Macleod
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  GPs' understanding and practice of safety netting for potential cancer presentations: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Julie Evans; Sue Ziebland; John I MacArtney; Clare R Bankhead; Peter W Rose; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Comorbid conditions delay diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a cohort study using electronic primary care records.

Authors:  Luke T A Mounce; Sarah Price; Jose M Valderas; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Patient involvement in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review of current interventions.

Authors:  Jane Heyhoe; Caroline Reynolds; Alice Dunning; Olivia Johnson; Alex Howat; Rebecca Lawton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Jones; Erica Di Martino; Stephen H Bradley; Blessing Essang; Scott Hemphill; Judy M Wright; Cristina Renzi; Claire Surr; Andrew Clegg; Richard Neal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.302

Review 6.  Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Aradhna Kaushal; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Richard D Neal; Bernard Rachet; Greg Rubin; Hardeep Singh; Fiona M Walter; Niek J de Wit; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Research into practice: prompt diagnosis of cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Greg Rubin; Fiona Walter; Jon Emery; Richard Neal; Willie Hamilton; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Managing risk in cancer presentation, detection and referral: a qualitative study of primary care staff views.

Authors:  Neil Cook; Gillian Thomson; Paola Dey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A geographical cluster randomised stepped wedge study of continuing medical education and cancer diagnosis in general practice.

Authors:  Berit Skjødeberg Toftegaard; Flemming Bro; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Patients' Experiences of Cancer Diagnosis as a Result of an Emergency Presentation: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Georgia Black; Jessica Sheringham; Vicki Spencer-Hughes; Melanie Ridge; Mairead Lyons; Charlotte Williams; Naomi Fulop; Kathy Pritchard-Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.