Literature DB >> 23336449

Cochrane reviews: relevant more than ever.

Tom Fahey, Susan M Smith, Floris van de Laar, Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23336449      PMCID： PMC3529257          DOI： 10.3399/bjgp13X660643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Outside the box: Why are Cochrane reviews so boring?

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  On the impossibility of being expert.

Authors:  Alan G Fraser; Frank D Dunstan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-12-14

3.  Searching for the right evidence: how to answer your clinical questions using the 6S hierarchy.

Authors:  Donna Windish
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2012-10-09

4.  The medical review article: state of the science.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Christian Grønhøj Larsen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

6.  The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience.

Authors:  Peter Doshi; Tom Jefferson; Chris Del Mar
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 11.069
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.