Literature DB >> 22781982

Outside the box: Why are Cochrane reviews so boring?

Trisha Greenhalgh1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22781982      PMCID： PMC3381259          DOI： 10.3399/bjgp12X652418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Hriday M Shah; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.730
  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Narrative reviews from a fraudulent author: reasons to retract.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Outside the box: why are Cochrane reviews so boring?

Authors:  Kev Kevork Hopayian
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Series introduction.

Authors:  Floris van de Laar; Tom Fahey; Tim Kenealy; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Cochrane reviews: relevant more than ever.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Susan M Smith; Floris van de Laar; Tim Kenealy; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Questioning the ethics of evidence-based practice for Indigenous health and social settings in Australia.

Authors:  Joanne Luke; Ebony Verbunt; Angela Zhang; Muriel Bamblett; Gabrielle Johnson; Connie Salamone; David Thomas; Sandra Eades; Lina Gubhaju; Margaret Kelaher; Amanda Jones
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-06

6.  Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors.

Authors:  Pamela Royle; Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala; Katharine Barnard; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-12

7.  Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Sally Thorne; Kirsti Malterud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.686

8.  Taking account of context in systematic reviews and guidelines considering a complexity perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Booth; Graham Moore; Kate Flemming; Ruth Garside; Nigel Rollins; Özge Tunçalp; Jane Noyes
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

9.  Systematic vs. Narrative Reviews in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Is Either Approach Superior to the Other?

Authors:  Philip Furley; Nadav Goldschmied
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Factors influencing citations to systematic reviews in skin diseases: a cross-sectional study through Web of Sciences and Scopus.

Authors:  Juan Manriquez; Karina Cataldo; Isidora Harz
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.896
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.