Literature DB >> 23335334

Correcting coalescent analyses for panel-based SNP ascertainment.

James R McGill1, Elizabeth A Walkup, Mary K Kuhner.   

Abstract

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data are routinely obtained by sequencing a region of interest in a small panel, constructing a chip with probes specific to sites found to vary in the panel, and using the chip to assay subsequent samples. The size of the chip is often reduced by removing low-frequency alleles from the set of SNPs. Using coalescent estimation of the scaled population size parameter, Θ, as a test case, we demonstrate the loss of information inherent in this procedure and develop corrections for coalescent analysis of SNPs obtained via a panel. We show that more accurate Θ-estimates can be recovered if the panel size is known, but at considerable computational cost as the panel individuals must be explicitly modeled in the analysis. We extend this technique to apply to the case where rare alleles have been omitted from the SNP panel. We find that when appropriate corrections for panel ascertainment and rare-allele omission are used, the biases introduced by ascertainment are largely correctable, but recovered estimates are less accurate than would be obtained with fully sequenced data. This method is then applied to recombinant multiple population data to investigate the effects of recombination and migration on the estimate of Θ.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335334      PMCID: PMC3606096          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.146738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  Estimation of population parameters and recombination rates from single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  R Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphism data for estimating population parameters.

Authors:  M K Kuhner; P Beerli; J Yamato; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection.

Authors:  Joshua M Akey; Ge Zhang; Kun Zhang; Li Jin; Mark D Shriver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of demographic parameters using the frequency spectrum of unlinked single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Alison M Adams; Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A highly informative SNP linkage panel for human genetic studies.

Authors:  Sarah Shaw Murray; Arnold Oliphant; Richard Shen; Celeste McBride; Rhoberta J Steeke; Stuart G Shannon; Todd Rubano; Bahram G Kermani; Jian-Bing Fan; Mark S Chee; Mark S T Hansen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Sequencing errors and molecular evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  A G Clark; T S Whittam
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles.

Authors:  W J Ewens
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth.

Authors:  Alex Coventry; Lara M Bull-Otterson; Xiaoming Liu; Andrew G Clark; Taylor J Maxwell; Jacy Crosby; James E Hixson; Thomas J Rea; Donna M Muzny; Lora R Lewis; David A Wheeler; Aniko Sabo; Christine Lusk; Kenneth G Weiss; Humeira Akbar; Andrew Cree; Alicia C Hawes; Irene Newsham; Robin T Varghese; Donna Villasana; Shannon Gross; Vandita Joshi; Jireh Santibanez; Margaret Morgan; Kyle Chang; Walker Hale Iv; Alan R Templeton; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard Gibbs; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Population genetic analysis of ascertained SNP data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.639

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of modern tomato breeding germplasm for deciphering the genetic control of agronomical traits by Genome Wide Association study.

Authors:  Guillaume Bauchet; Stéphane Grenier; Nicolas Samson; Julien Bonnet; Laurent Grivet; Mathilde Causse
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  How do SNP ascertainment schemes and population demographics affect inferences about population history?

Authors:  Emily Jane McTavish; David M Hillis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Correcting for sequencing error in maximum likelihood phylogeny inference.

Authors:  Mary K Kuhner; James McGill
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Short Tree, Long Tree, Right Tree, Wrong Tree: New Acquisition Bias Corrections for Inferring SNP Phylogenies.

Authors:  Adam D Leaché; Barbara L Banbury; Joseph Felsenstein; Adrián Nieto-Montes de Oca; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 15.683

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.