Literature DB >> 23335313

Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.

Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab1, Sepehr Feizi, Farid Karimian, Hossein Hasanpour.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure corneal elevations in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and those with keratoconus using the Galilei Scheimpflug analyzer and to determine the optimal corneal elevation cutoff points to maximize sensitivity and specificity in discriminating keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus from normal corneas.
METHODS: A total of 136 normal eyes, 23 eyes with subclinical keratoconus, and 51 eyes with keratoconus were enrolled. Maximum anterior and posterior corneal elevation was measured in the central 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones using the Galilei double Scheimpflug camera. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the measured parameters and to identify optimal cutoff points for discriminating keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus from normal corneas.
RESULTS: Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations in all zones were statistically higher in keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus versus normal corneas. The posterior elevation measurement in the 3-mm zone had the strongest power to distinguish keratoconus from normal. The corresponding figure for the 7-mm zone, however, had the strongest power to distinguish eyes with subclinical keratoconus (area under the curve, 0.98 and 0.92, respectively). Optimal cutoff point for posterior elevation in the 3-mm zone was 18.5 µm for keratoconus (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 95%). The corresponding figure in the 7-mm zone was 50.5 µm for subclinical keratoconus (sensitivity, 79.9%; specificity, 94.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior elevations measured by the Galilei analyzer in the 3-mm zone can effectively discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas. These measurements in the 7-mm zone can be considered to distinguish subclinical keratoconus.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335313     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

1.  Clinical utility of ocular residual astigmatism and topographic disparity vector indexes in subclinical and clinical keratoconus.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Roberto Soto-Negro; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Alberto Artola
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Evaluation of topographic, tomographic, topometric, densitometric, and aberrometric features of cornea with pentacam HR system in subclinical keratoconus.

Authors:  Haci Hasan Ozkan; Mustafa Koc; Hasan Kiziltoprak; Kemal Tekin; Emre Aydemir
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Strategies for improving the early diagnosis of keratoconus.

Authors:  Yue Shi
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2016-02-24

4.  Predictive Ability of Galilei to Distinguish Subclinical Keratoconus and Keratoconus from Normal Corneas.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mehdi Yaseri; Bahareh Kheiri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  Mean Posterior Corneal Power and Astigmatism in Normal Versus Keratoconic Eyes.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Siamak Delfazayebaher; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Farid Karimian; Vahid Ownagh; Fatemeh Sadeghpour
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.