Literature DB >> 23334785

The effect of 810-nm low-level laser therapy on pain caused by orthodontic elastomeric separators.

Ladan Eslamian1, Ali Borzabadi-Farahani, Aidin Hassanzadeh-Azhiri, Mohammad R Badiee, Reza Fekrazad.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 810-nm (DMC Equipamentos, Sao Carlos, Brazil) continuous wave low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the pain caused by orthodontic elastomeric separators. Thirty-seven orthodontic patients (12 male and 25 female, aged 11-32 years, mean age = 24.97 years) participated in the study, including 20 subjects aged 18 years or more, and 17 under 18 years of age. Four elastomeric separators (Dentarum, Springen, Germany) were placed for the first permanent molars (distal and mesial), either for maxillary (22 patients) or mandibular (15 patients) arches; one quadrant was randomly selected and used as a placebo group (received no laser irradiation). After separator placement for each quadrant, patients received 10 doses (2 J/cm(2), 100 mW, 20 s) of laser irradiation on the buccal side (at the cervical third of the roots), for distal and mesial of the second premolars and first permanent molars, as well as distal of second permanent molars (five doses). The same procedure was repeated for the lingual or palatal side (five doses). After 24 h, patients returned to the clinic and received another 10 doses of laser irradiation on the same quadrant. Postseparation pain level recorded on a 10-cm visual analog scale for both jaws immediately (hour 0), and after 6, 24, 30 h, as well as on days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Significant differences in the pain perception (PP) were found between the laser and placebo groups at 6, 24, 30 h, and day 3 of the experiment (P < 0.05). Friedman's test of multiple comparisons revealed significant differences in the PP among various time intervals for laser (chi-square = 173.407, P = 0.000) and placebo (chi-square = 184.712, P = 0.000) groups. In both groups, pain was highest at 6 and 30 h after placing elastomeric separators. No gender differences were observed in both groups. More pain was recorded in the mandible (P < 0.05) at 24 (laser group) and 30 h (both groups) after starting the experiment. The PP was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for the group aged 18 years or more, only at days 3 [both groups] and 4 [laser group only] of the experiment. The 810-nm continuous wave LLLT significantly reduced the PP in the first 3 days after orthodontic separation. However, the mean postseparation PP in both groups was low and wide ranges of PP scores were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23334785     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1258-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  49 in total

1.  Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Fahimeh Farzanegan; Seyed Mojtaba Zebarjad; Sanaz Alizadeh; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Separation effect and perception of pain and discomfort from two types of orthodontic separators.

Authors:  Lars Bondemark; Katarina Fredriksson; Susanna Ilros
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2004

Review 3.  Orthodontic pain: from causes to management--a review.

Authors:  Vinod Krishnan
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irradiation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during expansion in the rat.

Authors:  S Saito; N Shimizu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Effects of two types of low-level laser wave lengths (850 and 630 nm) on the orthodontic tooth movements in rabbits.

Authors:  Massoud Seifi; Hasan Ali Shafeei; Shahram Daneshdoost; Maziar Mir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of a masticatory bite wafer and avoidance of hard food on pain associated with initial orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Mladen Otasevic; Farhad B Naini; Daljit S Gill; Robert T Lee
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  P Ngan; B Kess; S Wilson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Low-level laser therapy for zymosan-induced arthritis in rats: Importance of illumination time.

Authors:  Ana P Castano; Tianhong Dai; Ilya Yaroslavsky; Richard Cohen; William A Apruzzese; Michael H Smotrich; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mohamed Youssef; Sharif Ashkar; Eyad Hamade; Norbert Gutknecht; Friedrich Lampert; Maziar Mir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Low power laser irradiation alters the rate of regeneration of the rat facial nerve.

Authors:  J J Anders; R C Borke; S K Woolery; W P Van de Merwe
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  59 in total

1.  Efficacy of Photobiomodulation Therapy for Orthodontic Pain Control Following the Placement of Elastomeric Separators: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  AmirHossein Mirhashemi; Seyedreza Rasouli; Shiva Shahi; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-22

2.  The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hu Long; Yang Zhou; Junjie Xue; Lina Liao; Niansong Ye; Fan Jian; Yan Wang; Wenli Lai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effects of early and delayed laser application on nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Tuba Akgul; Murat Gulsoy; Halil O Gulcur
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  The effects of low-level laser therapy on orthodontically induced root resorption.

Authors:  A Burcu Altan; A Altug Bicakci; H Ilhan Mutaf; Mahmut Ozkut; V Sevinc Inan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of bite wafer and low level laser therapy in reducing pain following initial arch wire placement.

Authors:  Shahin Bayani; Shima Rostami; Farzaneh Ahrari; Iman Saeedipouya
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2016-06-29

6.  Low-level laser therapy on bone repair: is there any effect outside the irradiated field?

Authors:  Jonas Dantas Batista; Sérgio Sargenti-Neto; Paula Dechichi; Flaviana Soares Rocha; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Low-level laser therapy for orthodontic pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  F J Li; J Y Zhang; X T Zeng; Y Guo
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Effect of ozone and diode laser (635 nm) in reducing orthodontic pain in the maxillary arch-a randomized clinical controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacek Matys; Elżbieta Jaszczak; Rafał Flieger; Katarzyna Kostrzewska-Kaminiarz; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Marzena Dominiak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Analysis of experimental tendinitis in rats treated with laser and platelet-rich plasma therapies by Raman spectroscopy and histometry.

Authors:  Paula Kariluce de Carvalho; Landulfo Silveira; Danillo Barbosa; Egberto Munin; Miguel Angel Castillo Salgado; Antonio Balbin Villaverde
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Potential anti-inflammatory effect of low-level laser therapy on the experimental reflux laryngitis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Renata R Marinho; Renata M Matos; Jandson S Santos; Maria A G Ribeiro; Ronaldo A Ribeiro; Roberto C P Lima; Ricardo L C Albuquerque; Sara M Thomazzi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.