Anna Luomaranta1, Arto Leminen, Mikko Loukovaara. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. anna.luomaranta@fimnet.fi
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model that might predict the probability of lymph node and distant metastasis (stages IIIC-IV) in endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: We studied 774 patients with endometrial carcinoma treated in a single institution. Demographic factors, biochemical factors and preoperative tumor characteristics, identified as potential risk factors for advanced carcinoma in unadjusted analyses, were used to create a logistic regression model with lymph node and distant metastasis as the dependent variable. Statistically significant odds ratios in the regression model were rounded to the nearest whole number. These rounded values were the estimated weights for each factor that were summed to generate a score that might predict the probability of stage IIIC-IV carcinoma. RESULTS: Biochemical factors and preoperative tumor characteristics predicted lymph node and distant metastasis in the regression model, whereas demographic factors were without effect. The score combining weighted risk factors was: (2 × leukocytosis)+(3 × thrombocytosis)+(7 × elevated CA125)+(4 × high-risk histology). The area under curve (AUC) for this total score was 0.823, with 71.6% sensitivity, 75.2% specificity, 25.9% positive predictive value, and 95.7% negative predictive value, using 6 as cut-point. After excluding stage IV carcinomas from the dataset, the AUC was 0.813 for the total score in predicting nodal involvement (P=0.82 vs. total score in predicting stage IIIC-IV carcinomas in the complete dataset). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the high negative predictive value, this prediction model could be applied for identifying patients who may not benefit from lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma staging.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model that might predict the probability of lymph node and distant metastasis (stages IIIC-IV) in endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: We studied 774 patients with endometrial carcinoma treated in a single institution. Demographic factors, biochemical factors and preoperative tumor characteristics, identified as potential risk factors for advanced carcinoma in unadjusted analyses, were used to create a logistic regression model with lymph node and distant metastasis as the dependent variable. Statistically significant odds ratios in the regression model were rounded to the nearest whole number. These rounded values were the estimated weights for each factor that were summed to generate a score that might predict the probability of stage IIIC-IV carcinoma. RESULTS: Biochemical factors and preoperative tumor characteristics predicted lymph node and distant metastasis in the regression model, whereas demographic factors were without effect. The score combining weighted risk factors was: (2 × leukocytosis)+(3 × thrombocytosis)+(7 × elevated CA125)+(4 × high-risk histology). The area under curve (AUC) for this total score was 0.823, with 71.6% sensitivity, 75.2% specificity, 25.9% positive predictive value, and 95.7% negative predictive value, using 6 as cut-point. After excluding stage IV carcinomas from the dataset, the AUC was 0.813 for the total score in predicting nodal involvement (P=0.82 vs. total score in predicting stage IIIC-IV carcinomas in the complete dataset). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the high negative predictive value, this prediction model could be applied for identifying patients who may not benefit from lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma staging.
Authors: Kemal Gungorduk; Ibrahim E Ertas; Aykut Ozdemir; Emrah Akkaya; Elcin Telli; Salih Taskin; Mehmet Gokcu; Ahmet Baris Guzel; Tufan Oge; Levent Akman; Tayfun Toptas; Ulas Solmaz; Askın Dogan; Mustafa Cosan Terek; Muzaffer Sanci; Aydin Ozsaran; Tayyup Simsek; Mehmet Ali Vardar; Omer Tarik Yalcin; Sinan Ozalp; Yusuf Yildirim; Firat Ortac Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Yovanni Casablanca; Guisong Wang; Heather A Lankes; Chunqiao Tian; Nicholas W Bateman; Caela R Miller; Nicole P Chappell; Laura J Havrilesky; Amy Hooks Wallace; Nilsa C Ramirez; David S Miller; Julie Oliver; Dave Mitchell; Tracy Litzi; Brian E Blanton; William J Lowery; John I Risinger; Chad A Hamilton; Neil T Phippen; Thomas P Conrads; David Mutch; Katherine Moxley; Roger B Lee; Floor Backes; Michael J Birrer; Kathleen M Darcy; George Larry Maxwell Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 6.575