| Literature DB >> 25622588 |
Kemal Gungorduk1, Ibrahim E Ertas1, Aykut Ozdemir1, Emrah Akkaya1, Elcin Telli2, Salih Taskin3, Mehmet Gokcu1, Ahmet Baris Guzel4, Tufan Oge2, Levent Akman5, Tayfun Toptas6, Ulas Solmaz1, Askın Dogan1, Mustafa Cosan Terek5, Muzaffer Sanci1, Aydin Ozsaran5, Tayyup Simsek6, Mehmet Ali Vardar4, Omer Tarik Yalcin2, Sinan Ozalp2, Yusuf Yildirim1, Firat Ortac3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the need for para-aortic lymphadectomy in patients with primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC).Entities:
Keywords: Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; Platelet lymphocyte ratio; Primary fallopian tube carcinoma; Prognostic factor; Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy
Year: 2014 PMID: 25622588 PMCID: PMC4506112 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Clinical characteristics of the study population
| Characteristic | No. (%) (n=91) |
|---|---|
| Age (yr)[ | 56.9 (32-81) |
| ≤60 | 41 (45.1) |
| > 60 | 50 (54.9) |
| Menopause | 55 (60.4) |
| Nulliparity | 9 (9.9) |
| Symptom | |
| Vaginal bleeding/discharge | 13 (14.3) |
| Abdominal pain | 20 (22.0) |
| Palpable mass | 24 (26.4) |
| Combination | 27 (29.7) |
| None | 7 (7.7) |
| Total white blood cell (cells/mm3)[ | 7,927.4 (3,620-12,100) |
| Neutrophil count (cells/mm3)[ | 5,009.4 (1,955-10,742) |
| Lymphocyte count (cells/mm3)[ | 1,904.5 (800-3,200) |
| Platelet count (cells/mm3)[ | 334,428.5 (172,000-640,000) |
| Presence of ascites | 18 (19.8) |
| CA-125 (U/mL)[ | 165.3 (5-1,268) |
| < 35 | 43 (47.3) |
| ≥ 35 | 37 (40.7) |
| Unknown | 11 (12.1) |
| Stage | |
| I | 34 (37.4) |
| II | 10 (10.9) |
| III | 43 (47.3) |
| IV | 4 (4.4) |
| Grade | |
| I | 7 (7.7) |
| II | 15 (16.5) |
| III | 60 (65.9) |
| Unknown | 9 (9.9) |
| Laterality of disease | |
| Right | 43 (47.1) |
| Left | 41 (45.1) |
| Bilateral | 7 (7.7) |
| No. of removed lymph nodes[ | |
| Pelvic | 14 (3-34) |
| Para-aortic | 12 (1-22) |
| Recurrence | 34 (37.4) |
| Duration of follow-up (mo)[ | 34 (14-78) |
| Disease-free survival (mo)[ | 29 (9-76) |
| Overall survival (mo)[ | 34 (14-78) |
Mean (range),
Median (range).
Surgical and clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients
| Characteristic | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Surgical procedures | |
| USO | 2 (2.2) |
| TAH+USO | 1 (1.1) |
| TAH+BSO | 5 (5.5) |
| TAH+BSO+omentectomy | 1 (1.1) |
| USO+washing ctyology+PLD+omentectomy | 2 (2.2) |
| TAH+BSO+washing ctyology+PLD+omentectomy | 32 (35.2) |
| TAH+BSO+washing ctyology+PPLD+omentectomy | 48 (52.7) |
| Residual tumor at initial surgery (cm) | |
| ≤ 1 | 59 (64.8) |
| > 1 | 32 (35.2) |
| No. of removed lymph nodes | |
| Pelvic | 14 (7-34) |
| Para-aortic | 12 (1-22) |
| Chemotherapy | |
| Yes | 79 (86.8) |
| No | 12 (13.2) |
| Radiotherapy | |
| Yes | 2 (2.2) |
| No | 89 (97.8) |
| Histological type | |
| Serous | 61 (67.0) |
| Non-serous | 30 (33.0) |
USO, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; PLD, pelvic lymphadenectomy; PPLD, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Predictive values of NLR and PLR for determination of disease stage and optimality of surgery
| Clinical feature | NLR > 2.7 | PLR > 233.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Advange stage of disease | ||
| Sensitivity | 85.1 (71.7-93.8) | 87.2 (74.3-95.2) |
| Specificity | 75.0 (59.7-86.8) | 63.6 (47.8-77.6) |
| Area under curve | 0.86 (0.77-0.92) | 0.76 (0.66-0.84) |
| Positive predictive value | 78.4 (64.7-88.7) | 71.9 (58.5-83.0) |
| Negative predictive value | 82.5 (67.0-92.8) | 82.4 (65.2-93.4) |
| Suboptimal surgery | ||
| Sensitivity | 77.9 (65.3-87.7) | 81.3(69.1-90.3) |
| Specificity | 84.3 (67.2-94.7) | 71.8 (53.3-86.3) |
| Area under curve | 0.84 (0.75-0.91) | 0.75 (0.65-0.83) |
| Positive predictive value | 90.2 (78.6-96.7) | 84.2 (72.1-92.5) |
| Negative predictive value | 67.5 (50.9-91.1) | 67.6 (49.5-82.6) |
NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.
Results of univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival of patients with fallopian tube carcinoma
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | p-value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Age (< 60 yr vs. ≥ 60 yr) | 1.3 | 0.7-2.5 | 0.30 | 1.1 | 0.5-2.1 | 0.76 |
| Stage (I/II vs. III/IV) | 1.9 | 1.1-3.3 | 0.01 | 3.1 | 1.2-7.9 | 0.01 |
| Grade (I vs. II vs. III) | 1.2 | 0.8-1.8 | 0.41 | 1.7 | 0.9-3.0 | 0.05 |
| Residual tumor size (< 1 cm vs. ≥ 1 cm) | 3.5 | 1.8-6.6 | 0.003 | 4.6 | 1.3-15.9 | 0.01 |
| Surgical type (none vs. partial vs. complete) | 1.5 | 0.9-2.3 | 0.06 | 1.5 | 0.9-2.5 | 0.06 |
| CA-125 (< 35 U/mL vs. ≥ 35 U/mL) | 1.1 | 0.6-2.0 | 0.58 | 1.1 | 0.5-2.3 | 0.72 |
| Histology (serous vs. non-serous) | 1.2 | 0.7-2.1 | 0.33 | 1.3 | 0.6-3.0 | 0.45 |
| Presence of ascites | 1.7 | 0.9-3.2 | 0.10 | 1.3 | 0.4-3.8 | 0.61 |
| Side (right vs. left vs. bilateral) | 1.0 | 0.6-1.7 | 0.81 | 1.0 | 0.5-2.0 | 0.77 |
| NLR (≤ 2.7 vs. > 2.7) | 2.5 | 1.3-4.6 | 0.01 | 2.1 | 0.6-7.1 | 0.21 |
| PLR (≤ 233.3 vs. > 233.3) | 1.4 | 0.7-2.6 | 0.29 | 1.5 | 0.5-4.1 | 0.39 |
| Platelet count (< 400,000 cells/mm3 vs. ≥ 400,000 cells/mm3) | 1.6 | 0.8-3.2 | 0.17 | 1.2 | 0.3-3.8 | 0.71 |
CI, confidence interval; CA-125, cancer antigen 125; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.
Fig. 1.(A) Disease-free survival curves according to neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). (B) Overall survival curves according to NLR. (C) Disease-free survival curves according to platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). (D) Overall survival curves according to PLR.
Results of univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival of patients with fallopian tube carcinoma
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | p-value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Age (< 60 yr vs. ≥ 60 yr) | 1.4 | 0.8-2.5 | 0.13 | 1.0 | 0.5-2.0 | 0.82 |
| Stage (I/II vs. III/IV) | 2.4 | 1.4-4.1 | 0.001 | 2.4 | 1.0-5.6 | 0.03 |
| Grade (I vs. II vs. III) | 1.2 | 0.8-1.9 | 0.30 | 1.7 | 0.9-3.0 | 0.07 |
| Residual tumor size (< 1 cm vs. ≥1 cm) | 4.0 | 2.3-7.0 | 0.0001 | 4.6 | 1.4-14.7 | 0.008 |
| Surgical type (none vs. partial vs. complete) | 1.9 | 1.1-3.2 | 0.004 | 1.8 | 1.1-3.1 | 0.01 |
| CA-125 (< 35 U/mL vs. ≥ 35 U/mL) | 1.7 | 1.0-3.0 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 0.5-2.2 | 0.79 |
| Histology (serous vs. non-serous) | 1.6 | 0.9-2.7 | 0.04 | 1.4 | 0.9-3.0 | 0.43 |
| Presence of ascites | 2.1 | 1.2-3.8 | 0.009 | 1.4 | 0.6-3.5 | 0.36 |
| Side (right vs. left vs. bilateral) | 1.0 | 0.6-1.6 | 0.86 | 1.4 | 0.8-2.6 | 0.19 |
| NLR (≤ 2.7 vs. > 2.7) | 4.3 | 2.4-7.6 | 0.0002 | 3.2 | 1.1-9.3 | 0.03 |
| PLR (≤ 233.3 vs. > 233.3) | 2.0 | 1.1-3.6 | 0.04 | 1.1 | 0.4-3.0 | 0.82 |
| Platelet count (< 400,000 cells/mm3 vs. ≥ 400,000 cells/mm3) | 2.4 | 1.2-4.7 | 0.03 | 1.1 | 0.3-3.6 | 0.82 |
CI, confidence interval; CA-125, cancer antigen; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.
Fig. 2.(A) Disease-free survival rates according to surgical staging type (partial staging [PS] vs. complete staging [CS]). (B) Overall survival rates according to surgical staging type (PS vs. CS).