Payal Kapur1,2, Samuel Peña-Llopis2,3,4, Alana Christie4, Leah Zhrebker2, Andrea Pavía-Jiménez2,3,4, W Kimryn Rathmell5, Xian-Jin Xie4, James Brugarolas2,3,4. 1. Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Department of Developmental Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Departments of Internal Medicine and Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clear-cell renal-cell carcinomas display divergent clinical behaviours. However, the molecular genetic events driving these behaviours are unknown. We discovered that BAP1 is mutated in about 15% of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma, and that BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations are largely mutually exclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological significance of these molecular subtypes and to determine whether patients with BAP1-mutant and PBRM1-mutant tumours had different overall survival. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we assessed 145 patients with primary clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma and defined PBRM1 and BAP1 mutation status from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), TX, USA, between 1998 and 2011. We classified patients into those with BAP1-mutant tumours and those with tumours exclusively mutated for PBRM1 (PBRM1-mutant). We used a second independent cohort (n=327) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for validation. In both cohorts, more than 80% of patients had localised or locoregional disease at presentation. Overall both cohorts were similar, although the TCGA had more patients with metastatic and higher-grade disease, and more TCGA patients presented before molecularly targeted therapies became available. FINDINGS: The median overall survival in the UTSW cohort was significantly shorter for patients with BAP1-mutant tumours (4·6 years; 95% CI 2·1-7·2), than for patients with PBRM1-mutant tumours (10·6 years; 9·8-11·5), corresponding to a HR of 2·7 (95% CI 0·99-7·6, p=0·044). Median overall survival in the TCGA cohort was 1·9 years (95% CI 0·6-3·3) for patients with BAP1-mutant tumours and 5·4 years (4·0-6·8) for those with PBRM1-mutant tumours. A HR similar to the UTSW cohort was noted in the TCGA cohort (2·8; 95% CI 1·4-5·9; p=0·004). Patients with mutations in both BAP1 and PBRM1, although a minority (three in UTSW cohort and four in TCGA cohort), had the worst overall survival (median 2·1 years, 95% CI 0·3-3·8, for the UTSW cohort, and 0·2 years, 0·0-1·2, for the TCGA cohort). INTERPRETATION: Our findings identify mutation-defined subtypes of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma with distinct clinical outcomes, a high-risk BAP1-mutant group and a favourable PBRM1-mutant group. These data establish the basis for a molecular genetic classification of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma that could influence treatment decisions in the future. The existence of different molecular subtypes with disparate outcomes should be considered in the design and assessment of clinical studies. FUNDING: Cancer Prevention and Research Institution of Texas and National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND:Clear-cell renal-cell carcinomas display divergent clinical behaviours. However, the molecular genetic events driving these behaviours are unknown. We discovered that BAP1 is mutated in about 15% of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma, and that BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations are largely mutually exclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological significance of these molecular subtypes and to determine whether patients with BAP1-mutant and PBRM1-mutant tumours had different overall survival. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we assessed 145 patients with primary clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma and defined PBRM1 and BAP1 mutation status from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), TX, USA, between 1998 and 2011. We classified patients into those with BAP1-mutant tumours and those with tumours exclusively mutated for PBRM1 (PBRM1-mutant). We used a second independent cohort (n=327) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for validation. In both cohorts, more than 80% of patients had localised or locoregional disease at presentation. Overall both cohorts were similar, although the TCGA had more patients with metastatic and higher-grade disease, and more TCGA patients presented before molecularly targeted therapies became available. FINDINGS: The median overall survival in the UTSW cohort was significantly shorter for patients with BAP1-mutant tumours (4·6 years; 95% CI 2·1-7·2), than for patients with PBRM1-mutant tumours (10·6 years; 9·8-11·5), corresponding to a HR of 2·7 (95% CI 0·99-7·6, p=0·044). Median overall survival in the TCGA cohort was 1·9 years (95% CI 0·6-3·3) for patients with BAP1-mutant tumours and 5·4 years (4·0-6·8) for those with PBRM1-mutant tumours. A HR similar to the UTSW cohort was noted in the TCGA cohort (2·8; 95% CI 1·4-5·9; p=0·004). Patients with mutations in both BAP1 and PBRM1, although a minority (three in UTSW cohort and four in TCGA cohort), had the worst overall survival (median 2·1 years, 95% CI 0·3-3·8, for the UTSW cohort, and 0·2 years, 0·0-1·2, for the TCGA cohort). INTERPRETATION: Our findings identify mutation-defined subtypes of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma with distinct clinical outcomes, a high-risk BAP1-mutant group and a favourable PBRM1-mutant group. These data establish the basis for a molecular genetic classification of clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma that could influence treatment decisions in the future. The existence of different molecular subtypes with disparate outcomes should be considered in the design and assessment of clinical studies. FUNDING: Cancer Prevention and Research Institution of Texas and National Cancer Institute.
Authors: J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Shomik Sengupta; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Igor Frank; R Houston Thompson; W Scott Webster; Horst Zincke; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Eugene D Kwon Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stefano J Mandriota; Kevin J Turner; David R Davies; Paul G Murray; Neil V Morgan; Heidi M Sowter; Charles C Wykoff; Eamonn R Maher; Adrian L Harris; Peter J Ratcliffe; Patrick H Maxwell Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Michael L Nickerson; Erich Jaeger; Yangu Shi; Jeffrey A Durocher; Sunil Mahurkar; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matveev; Vladimir Janout; Hellena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Anush Mukeria; Ivana Holcatova; Laura S Schmidt; Jorge R Toro; Sara Karami; Rayjean Hung; Gary F Gerard; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Berton Zbar; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Nathaniel Rothman; Wong-Ho Chow; Frederic M Waldman; Lee E Moore Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hai-Bin Ruan; Xuemei Han; Min-Dian Li; Jay Prakash Singh; Kevin Qian; Sascha Azarhoush; Lin Zhao; Anton M Bennett; Varman T Samuel; Jing Wu; John R Yates; Xiaoyong Yang Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Samuel Peña-Llopis; Silvia Vega-Rubín-de-Celis; Arnold Liao; Nan Leng; Andrea Pavía-Jiménez; Shanshan Wang; Toshinari Yamasaki; Leah Zhrebker; Sharanya Sivanand; Patrick Spence; Lisa Kinch; Tina Hambuch; Suneer Jain; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Pia Banerji Summerour; Wareef Kabbani; S W Wendy Wong; Nick Grishin; Marc Laurent; Xian-Jin Xie; Christian D Haudenschild; Mark T Ross; David R Bentley; Payal Kapur; James Brugarolas Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-06-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Gijs van Haaften; Gillian L Dalgliesh; Helen Davies; Lina Chen; Graham Bignell; Chris Greenman; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Sarah O'Meara; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Jonathan Hinton; Calli Latimer; Jenny Andrews; Syd Barthorpe; Dave Beare; Gemma Buck; Peter J Campbell; Jennifer Cole; Simon Forbes; Mingming Jia; David Jones; Chai Yin Kok; Catherine Leroy; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Mark Maddison; Simon Maquire; Kirsten McLay; Andrew Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko; Lee Mulderrig; Laura Mudie; Erin Pleasance; Rebecca Shepherd; Raffaella Smith; Lucy Stebbings; Philip Stephens; Gurpreet Tang; Patrick S Tarpey; Rachel Turner; Kelly Turrell; Jennifer Varian; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Paul Wray; V Peter Collins; Koichi Ichimura; Simon Law; John Wong; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung; Giovanni Tonon; Ronald A DePinho; Yu-Tzu Tai; Kenneth C Anderson; Richard J Kahnoski; Aaron Massie; Sok Kean Khoo; Bin Tean Teh; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-03-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sebastian Walpole; Antonia L Pritchard; Colleen M Cebulla; Robert Pilarski; Meredith Stautberg; Frederick H Davidorf; Arnaud de la Fouchardière; Odile Cabaret; Lisa Golmard; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Erin Garfield; Ching-Ni Njauw; Mitchell Cheung; Joni A Turunen; Pauliina Repo; Reetta-Stiina Järvinen; Remco van Doorn; Martine J Jager; Gregorius P M Luyten; Marina Marinkovic; Cindy Chau; Miriam Potrony; Veronica Höiom; Hildur Helgadottir; Lorenza Pastorino; William Bruno; Virginia Andreotti; Bruna Dalmasso; Giulia Ciccarese; Paola Queirolo; Luca Mastracci; Karin Wadt; Jens Folke Kiilgaard; Michael R Speicher; Natasha van Poppelen; Emine Kilic; Rana'a T Al-Jamal; Irma Dianzani; Marta Betti; Carsten Bergmann; Sandro Santagata; Sonika Dahiya; Saleem Taibjee; Jo Burke; Nicola Poplawski; Sally J O'Shea; Julia Newton-Bishop; Julian Adlard; David J Adams; Anne-Marie Lane; Ivana Kim; Sonja Klebe; Hilary Racher; J William Harbour; Michael L Nickerson; Rajmohan Murali; Jane M Palmer; Madeleine Howlie; Judith Symmons; Hayley Hamilton; Sunil Warrier; William Glasson; Peter Johansson; Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza; Raul Ossio; Annelies de Klein; Susana Puig; Paola Ghiorzo; Maartje Nielsen; Tero T Kivelä; Hensin Tsao; Joseph R Testa; Pedram Gerami; Marc-Henri Stern; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Nicholas K Hayward Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christoph A Karlo; Pier Luigi Di Paolo; Joshua Chaim; A Ari Hakimi; Irina Ostrovnaya; Paul Russo; Hedvig Hricak; Robert Motzer; James J Hsieh; Oguz Akin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Daniel M Tennenbaum; Brandon J Manley; Emily Zabor; Maria F Becerra; Maria I Carlo; Jozefina Casuscelli; Almedina Redzematovic; Nabeela Khan; Maria E Arcila; Martin H Voss; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer; Nicole E Benfante; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo; James J Hsieh; Abraham Ari Hakimi Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: James J Hsieh; David Chen; Patricia I Wang; Mahtab Marker; Almedina Redzematovic; Ying-Bei Chen; S Duygu Selcuklu; Nils Weinhold; Nancy Bouvier; Kety H Huberman; Umesh Bhanot; Michael S Chevinsky; Parul Patel; Patrizia Pinciroli; Helen H Won; Daoqi You; Agnes Viale; William Lee; A Ari Hakimi; Michael F Berger; Nicholas D Socci; Emily H Cheng; Jennifer Knox; Martin H Voss; Maurizio Voi; Robert J Motzer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 20.096