Literature DB >> 23332890

Modified RECIST to assess tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation in 178 liver explants.

Irene Bargellini1, Elena Bozzi, Daniela Campani, Paola Carrai, Paolo De Simone, Luca Pollina, Roberto Cioni, Franco Filipponi, Carlo Bartolozzi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate agreement between modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessed at Computed Tomography (CT) and pathology in a large series of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were transplanted after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained. The study included 178 patients (M/F=155/23; mean age 55.8 ± 6.3 years) with HCC who were transplanted after TACE from January 1996 to December 2010 and with at least one CT examination before liver transplantation (LT). Two blinded independent readers retrospectively reviewed CT examinations, to assess tumor response to TACE according to mRECIST. Patients were classified in responders (complete and partial response) and non-responders (stable and progressive disease). On the explanted livers, percentage of tumor necrosis was classified as 100, >50 and <50%.
RESULTS: The mean interval between latest CT and LT was 57.4 ± 39.8 days. At latest CT examination, the objective response rate was 78.1% (139/178), with 86 cases (48.3%) of complete response (CR). A good intra- (k=0.75 and 0.86) and inter-observer (k=0.81) agreement was obtained. On a per-patient basis, agreement between mRECIST and pathology was obtained in 120 patients (67.4%), with 19 cases (10.7%) of underestimation and 39 cases (21.9%) of overestimation of tumor response at CT. CT sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between responders and non-responders were 93 and 82.9%, respectively. Out of 302 nodules, sensitivity and specificity of CT in detecting complete necrosis were 87.5 and 68.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CT can overestimate tumor response after TACE. Nonetheless, mRECIST assessed at CT after TACE are reproducible and reliable in differentiating responders and non-responders.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23332890     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Transarterial Chemoembolization using Quantitative Analysis of 2D and 3D Real-time Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Maria Stanczak; Andrej Lyshchik; Priscilla Machado; Yuko Kono; Flemming Forsberg; Colette M Shaw; John R Eisenbrey
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-04-18

2.  Radiofrequency and microwave ablation in combination with transarterial chemoembolization induce equivalent histopathologic coagulation necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients bridged to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Raj Vasnani; Michael Ginsburg; Osman Ahmed; Taral Doshi; John Hart; Helen Te; Thuong Gustav Van Ha
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Parametric response mapping of dynamic CT for predicting intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Seung Joon Choi; Jonghoon Kim; Jongbum Seo; Hyung Sik Kim; Jong-min Lee; Hyunjin Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Percutaneous treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding 3 cm: combined therapy or microwave ablation? Preliminary results.

Authors:  Andrea Veltri; Carlo Gazzera; Marco Calandri; Francesco Marenco; Andrea Doriguzzi Breatta; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Evaluation of 70-150-μm doxorubicin-eluting beads for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the rabbit liver VX2 tumour model.

Authors:  Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Sahar Mirpour; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Pramod Rao; Romaric Loffroy; Olivier Pellerin; Eleni A Liapi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Assessment of response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tushar Patel; Denise Harnois
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluating the treatment response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using modified RECIST.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Man-Xia Lin; Ming-de Lu; Zuo-Feng Xu; Ke-Guo Zheng; Wei Wang; Ming Kuang; Wen-Quan Zhuang; Xiao-Yan Xie
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Roberto Iezzi; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Marine Gilabert; Jordi Bruix; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Efficacy of TACE in TIPS patients: comparison of treatment response to chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Yuo-Chen Kuo; Maureen P Kohi; David M Naeger; Ricky T Tong; K Pallav Kolli; Andrew G Taylor; Jeanne M Laberge; Robert K Kerlan; Nicholas Fidelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.