Literature DB >> 23332817

Cortical control of inhibition of return: causal evidence for task-dependent modulations by dorsal and ventral parietal regions.

Alexia Bourgeois1, Ana B Chica, Antoni Valero-Cabré, Paolo Bartolomeo.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) reflects a bias to preferentially attend to non-previously attended or inspected spatial locations. IOR is paramount to efficiently explore our environment, by avoiding repeated scanning of already visited locations. Patients with left visual neglect after right parietal damage or fronto-parietal disconnection demonstrated impaired manual, but not saccadic, IOR for right-sided targets (Bourgeois et al., 2012). Here we aimed at investigating in healthy participants the causal role of distinct cortical sites within the right hemisphere in manual and saccadic IOR, by evaluating the offline effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on the right intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) and the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). Our results show that rTMS over both sites lastingly interfered with manual but not saccadic IOR for right-sided targets. This behavioral pattern closely mimicked the performance of neglect patients evaluated with the same paradigm. In contrast, for left-sided targets, rTMS over the right IPS impaired both manual and saccadic IOR, while rTMS over the right TPJ produced no modulation in either task. We concluded that distinct parietal nodes of the dorsal and ventral spatial attention networks of the right hemisphere make different contributions to exogenous orienting processes implicated in IOR, and that such effects are hemifield- and task-dependent.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inhibition of return; Intra-parietal sulcus; Manual; Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Saccadic; Temporo-parietal junction

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23332817     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Further evidence against a momentum explanation for IOR.

Authors:  Jonathan W Harris; Christopher D Cowper-Smith; Raymond M Klein; David A Westwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  On the role of the ventral attention system in spatial orienting.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Alexia Bourgeois; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?

Authors:  Alexia Bourgeois; Rémi Neveu; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study.

Authors:  Alexia Bourgeois; Emmanuel Badier; Naem Baron; Fabien Carruzzo; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions.

Authors:  Mayuko Iriguchi; Rumi Fujimura; Hiroki Koda; Nobuo Masataka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of pro-cholinergic treatment in patients suffering from spatial neglect.

Authors:  N Lucas; A Saj; S Schwartz; R Ptak; C Thomas; P Conne; R Leroy; S Pavin; K Diserens; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Romain Quentin; Lorena Chanes; Andres Mitsumasu; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.