Literature DB >> 23332055

Cellular response to substrate rigidity is governed by either stress or strain.

Ai Kia Yip1, Katsuhiko Iwasaki, Chaitanya Ursekar, Hiroaki Machiyama, Mayur Saxena, Huiling Chen, Ichiro Harada, Keng-Hwee Chiam, Yasuhiro Sawada.   

Abstract

Cells sense the rigidity of their substrate; however, little is known about the physical variables that determine their response to this rigidity. Here, we report traction stress measurements carried out using fibroblasts on polyacrylamide gels with Young's moduli ranging from 6 to 110 kPa. We prepared the substrates by employing a modified method that involves N-acryloyl-6-aminocaproic acid (ACA). ACA allows for covalent binding between proteins and elastomers and thus introduces a more stable immobilization of collagen onto the substrate when compared to the conventional method of using sulfo-succinimidyl-6-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl-amino) hexanoate (sulfo-SANPAH). Cells remove extracellular matrix proteins off the surface of gels coated using sulfo-SANPAH, which corresponds to lower values of traction stress and substrate deformation compared to gels coated using ACA. On soft ACA gels (Young's modulus <20 kPa), cell-exerted substrate deformation remains constant, independent of the substrate Young's modulus. In contrast, on stiff substrates (Young's modulus >20 kPa), traction stress plateaus at a limiting value and the substrate deformation decreases with increasing substrate rigidity. Sustained substrate strain on soft substrates and sustained traction stress on stiff substrates suggest these may be factors governing cellular responses to substrate rigidity.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23332055      PMCID: PMC3540269          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing.

Authors:  Masha Prager-Khoutorsky; Alexandra Lichtenstein; Ramaswamy Krishnan; Kavitha Rajendran; Avi Mayo; Zvi Kam; Benjamin Geiger; Alexander D Bershadsky
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  Sensing substrate rigidity by mechanosensitive ion channels with stress fibers and focal adhesions.

Authors:  Takeshi Kobayashi; Masahiro Sokabe
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Changes in the magnitude and distribution of forces at different Dictyostelium developmental stages.

Authors:  H Delanoë-Ayari; S Iwaya; Y T Maeda; J Inose; C Rivière; M Sano; J-P Rieu
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2008-04

5.  Neutrophil morphology and migration are affected by substrate elasticity.

Authors:  Patrick W Oakes; Dipan C Patel; Nicole A Morin; Daniel P Zitterbart; Ben Fabry; Jonathan S Reichner; Jay X Tang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior.

Authors:  Démosthène Mitrossilis; Jonathan Fouchard; Axel Guiroy; Nicolas Desprat; Nicolas Rodriguez; Ben Fabry; Atef Asnacios
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Decoupling substrate stiffness, spread area, and micropost density: a close spatial relationship between traction forces and focal adhesions.

Authors:  Sangyoon J Han; Kevin S Bielawski; Lucas H Ting; Marita L Rodriguez; Nathan J Sniadecki
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Traction forces of fibroblasts are regulated by the Rho-dependent kinase but not by the myosin light chain kinase.

Authors:  Karen A Beningo; Kozue Hamao; Micah Dembo; Yu-Li Wang; Hiroshi Hosoya
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Polyacrylamide hydrogels for cell mechanics: steps toward optimization and alternative uses.

Authors:  Casey E Kandow; Penelope C Georges; Paul A Janmey; Karen A Beningo
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.441

10.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure.

Authors:  Tzvetelina Tzvetkova-Chevolleau; Angélique Stéphanou; David Fuard; Jacques Ohayon; Patrick Schiavone; Philippe Tracqui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  35 in total

1.  Spatially coordinated changes in intracellular rheology and extracellular force exertion during mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Kathleen M McAndrews; Daniel J McGrail; Nhat D Quach; Michelle R Dawson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Spontaneous migration of cellular aggregates from giant keratocytes to running spheroids.

Authors:  Grégory Beaune; Carles Blanch-Mercader; Stéphane Douezan; Julien Dumond; David Gonzalez-Rodriguez; Damien Cuvelier; Thierry Ondarçuhu; Pierre Sens; Sylvie Dufour; Michael P Murrell; Françoise Brochard-Wyart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mechanical stimulation induces formin-dependent assembly of a perinuclear actin rim.

Authors:  Xiaowei Shao; Qingsen Li; Alex Mogilner; Alexander D Bershadsky; G V Shivashankar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Substrate rigidity-dependent positive feedback regulation between YAP and ROCK2.

Authors:  Wataru Sugimoto; Katsuhiko Itoh; Yasumasa Mitsui; Takahiro Ebata; Hideaki Fujita; Hiroaki Hirata; Keiko Kawauchi
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Biomaterial substrate modifications that influence cell-material interactions to prime cellular responses to nonviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Amy Mantz; Angela K Pannier
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-01-08

6.  Axon tension regulates fasciculation/defasciculation through the control of axon shaft zippering.

Authors:  Daniel Šmít; Coralie Fouquet; Frédéric Pincet; Martin Zapotocky; Alain Trembleau
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  A computational model of the response of adherent cells to stretch and changes in substrate stiffness.

Authors:  Harikrishnan Parameswaran; Kenneth R Lutchen; Béla Suki
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-01-09

Review 8.  Topography design concept of a tissue engineering scaffold for controlling cell function and fate through actin cytoskeletal modulation.

Authors:  Hiromi Miyoshi; Taiji Adachi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Matrix mechanics controls FHL2 movement to the nucleus to activate p21 expression.

Authors:  Naotaka Nakazawa; Aneesh R Sathe; G V Shivashankar; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Orientations of Cells on Compliant Substrates under Biaxial Stretches: A Theoretical Study.

Authors:  Guang-Kui Xu; Xi-Qiao Feng; Huajian Gao
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.