| Literature DB >> 23331872 |
Dario Patricelli1, Marcin Sielezniew, Donata Ponikwicka-Tyszko, Mirosław Ratkiewicz, Simona Bonelli, Francesca Barbero, Magdalena Witek, Magdalena M Buś, Robert Rutkowski, Emilio Balletto.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Climatic oscillations are among the long-term factors shaping the molecular features of animals and plants and it is generally supposed that the rear edges (i.e., the low-latitude limits of distribution of any given specialised species) situated closer to glacial refugia are vital long-term stores of genetic diversity. In the present study, we compared the genetic structure of several populations of an endangered and obligate myrmecophilous butterfly (Maculinea arion) from two distinct and geographically distant parts of its European distribution (i.e., Italy and Poland), which fully represent the ecological and morphological variation occurring across the continent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23331872 PMCID: PMC3558474 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Information on sampling locations of studied in Italy and Poland
| | | | | ||
| VFE | Val Ferret | Aosta Valley | 45 50’N/6 59’E | 1636 m | |
| CUN | Cuneo | Piedmont | 44 25’N/7 35’E | 443 m | |
| LOA | Loazzolo | Piedmont | 44 39’N/8 14’E | 356 m | |
| CDF | Colle Delle Finestre | Piedmont | 45 04’N/7 03’E | 2185 m | |
| VAL | Valdieri | Piedmont | 44 16’N/7 23’E | 1400 m | |
| BDR | Bagno di Romagna | Emilia Romagna | 43 50’N/11 53E’ | 600 m | |
| CET | Mt Cetona | Tuscany | 42 56’N/11 52’E | 1006 m | |
| AUR | Mt Aurunci | Lazio | 41 18’N/13 38’E | 1218 m | |
| CER | Mt Cervati | Campania | 40 19’N/15 25’E | 1000 m | |
| | | | | ||
| GUG | Gugny | Biebrza Basin | 53 19’N/22 35’E | 100 m | |
| PIA | Piaski | Narew Valley | 53 13’N/22 45’E | 105 m | |
| SOW | Sowlany | Podlaise | 53 09’N/23 15’E | 160 m | |
| TRU | Truskaw | Mazovia | 52 19’N/20 46’E | 80 m | |
| HOR | Horodyszcze | Polesie | 51 46’N/23 12’E | 150 m | |
| ORC | Włodawa | Polesie | 51 31’N/23 35’E | 150 m | |
| HUT | Hutki-Kanki | Kraków-Częstochowa Upland | 50 24’N/19 30’E | 360 m | |
| SUK | Suk | Kielce Upland | 50 47’N/20 42’E | 250 m | |
| KLU | Kluszkowce | Gorce Mts. | 49 27’N/20 19’E | 730 m | |
| SRO | Sromowce | Pieniny Mts. | 49 24’N/20 24’E | 530 m | |
| BAB | Babice | Dyn Foothills | 49 49’N/22 30’E | 250 m | |
a.s.l. – above sea level. LHP – larval host plant.
Figure 1Distribution of COI haplotypes among populations of sampled in Italy and Poland. The data are supplemented by haplotypes detected by Ugelvig [28] and Als et al. [58] and the maximum parsimony networks for all haplotypes. Unique COI haplotypes (present in individual populations only) are left uncoloured. The sizes of the circles are directly proportional to the number of individuals analysed. For full site names and other details see Table 1.
Genetic variation in populations from Italy and Poland
| CER | 5 | 0.600 (2) | 0.38 | 5 | 0.467 (2) | 0.10 |
| AUR | 17 | 0.596 (4) | 0.13 | 20 | 0.396 (6) | 0.10 |
| CET | 18 | 0.111 (2) | 0.02 | 21 | 0.182 (4) | 0.04 |
| BDR | 9 | 0.556 (3) | 0.13 | 14 | 0.434 (5) | 0.10 |
| LOA | 16 | 0.125 (2) | 0.03 | 17 | 0.724 (6) | 0.40 |
| CUN | 24 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 25 | 0.610 (3) | 0.32 |
| VAL | 6 | 0.733 (3) | 0.19 | 6 | 0.313 (4) | 0.47 |
| CDF | 21 | 0.571 (3) | 0.20 | 21 | 0.571 (7) | 0.23 |
| VFE | 22 | 0.515 (4) | 0.16 | 24 | 0.448 (4) | 0.14 |
| GUG | 9 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 14 | 0.490 (3) | 0.11 |
| SOW | 8 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 10 | 0.337 (2) | 0.07 |
| PIA | 9 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 10 | 0.521 (2) | 0.11 |
| TRU | 5 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 7 | 0.604 (3) | 0.14 |
| HOR | 8 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 8 | 0.608 (3) | 0.16 |
| ORC | 5 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 10 | 0.631 (6) | 0.21 |
| SUK | 8 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 11 | 0.667 (5) | 0.21 |
| HUT | 12 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 12 | 0.743 (8) | 0.30 |
| BAB | 8 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 10 | 0.568 (3) | 0.21 |
| KLU | 7 | 0.000 (1) | 0.00 | 10 | 0.563(3) | 0.13 |
| SRO | 8 | 0.250 (2) | 0.06 | 8 | 0.675 (3) | 0.31 |
N – sample size, h – haplotype and gene diversity, number of haplotypes (N) is given in parentheses, π – nucleotide diversity. COI – cytochrome oxidase subunit I (mtDNA), EF-1α – elongation factor (nuclear gene). For full site names and other details see Table 1.
Figure 2Distribution of EF-1α haplotypes among populations of sampled in Italy and Poland. The data are supplemented by haplotypes detected by Als et al. [58] and the maximum parsimony networks for all haplotypes. Rare EF-1α haplotypes (present only in one or two populations) are left uncoloured. The sizes of the circles are directly proportional to the number of individuals analysed. For full site names and other details see Table 1.
Figure 3Matrix of pairwise Upper and lower matrices show the F values for COI gene and for EF-1α, respectively, between each population; localities are provided in Table 1. Abbreviations of populations from Italy and Poland are given in black and red, respectively and additionally localities of M. arion ligurica and M. obscura are underlined and italised, respectively.