| Literature DB >> 23331459 |
Majdi Halabi, Kanishka Ratnayaka, Anthony Z Faranesh, Michael S Hansen, Israel M Barbash, Michael A Eckhaus, Joel R Wilson, Marcus Y Chen, Michael C Slack, Ozgur Kocaturk, William H Schenke, Victor J Wright, Robert J Lederman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aim to deliver large appliances into the left ventricle through the right ventricle and across the interventricular septum. This transthoracic access route exploits immediate recoil of the septum, and lower transmyocardial pressure gradient across the right versus left ventricular free wall. The route may enhance safety and allow subxiphoid rather than intercostal traversal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23331459 PMCID: PMC4174899 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Figure 1The 18Fr sheath is modified by shortening (to 15 cm) and using a 3D-printed locking dilator (A, blue).
Figure 2The interventional CMR environment used here. Panel (A) shows the operator leaning into the 70 cm bore to establish transthoracic access during real-time CMR. LCD projectors display instantaneous hemodynamics, scanner control, and CMR. Acoustic noise suppression headsets allow communication with staff in the control room. Inset (B) shows the access port with the table moved out of the scanner, viewed from the left leg.
Figure 3Real-time CMR of a typical procedure. (A,B) Simultaneous views of needle across chest and septum into the LV. (C) Guidewire through needle into descending aorta. (D) Balloon catheter indicates sheath tip (arrow) as it is withdrawn. (E, F) RV free wall closure using a nitinol occluder (arrow).
Hemodynamics and oximetry
| | | | |
| Heart rate beats/min | 81 ± 18 | 97 ± 28 | 0.17 |
| Mean arterial pressure mmHg | 54 ± 10 | 51 ± 6 | 0.50 |
| | | | |
| Femoral artery% | 95 ± 0.6 | 95 ± 0.7 | 0.20 |
| Right atrium% | 71 ± 6.2 | 66 ± 7.5 | 0.20 |
| RV% | 72 ± 6.7 | 67 ± 7.8 | 0.16 |
| Pulmonary artery% | 72 ± 7.1 | 66 ± 8.8 | 0.14 |
| Qp/Qs | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 0.80 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 8.4 ± 3.9 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 0.30 |
Figure 4(A) and high-resolution late-gadolinium CMR of the healed interventricular septum tract (arrow) and nitinol occluder (arrowhead) after four weeks.
Figure 5Fresh macroscopic and Masson trichrome (collagen-avid) microscopic images of the interventricular septal tract (arrow) after four weeks, showing fibrosis and no evident bystander injury.
Figure 6Macroscopic specimen of the ASD device from the RV cavity (A) and outside the RV free wall (B) four weeks after implantation. The endocardial surface is partially fibrosed.
Figure 7Theoretical trajectories from human CTA. (A) “Conventional” atrial transseptal trajectory to the mitral valve has entry angle (α) = 95°. (B) Subxiphoid trajectory to the mitral valve across the RV and interventricular septum, α = 150°. (C) Subxiphoid trajectory to the aortic valve across the RV and interventricular septum, α = 130°. These also depict the distances reported in Table 2.
Geometry of transventricular and conventional trajectories based on human CT data
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To aortic valve annulus | 43 ± 4 | 125 ± 6° | - | - |
| To mitral valve annulus | 44 ± 4 | 148 ± 6° * | 37.8 ± 5.7 | 98.9 ± 5 |
Distances are reported between chamber entry site (LV endocardial border for transventricular access, LA border for atrial transseptal access) and the center of the target valve annulus. Angles are reported between chamber entry site and a line directly to the center of the target valve annulus. These are depicted graphically in Figure 6. * = p < 0.01 compared with an atrial transseptal trajectory.