BACKGROUND: Hair is a promising tissue to assess exposure to 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), a carcinogen formed in cooked meats. However, an understanding of how dietary exposure to PhIP, cytochrome P450 1A2 activity-a key enzyme involved in PhIP metabolism, and hair pigmentation affect the level of PhIP accrued in hair is required to determine the reliability of the PhIP hair level as a biomarker of exposure to this carcinogen. METHODS: We examined the impact of PhIP exposure, cytochrome P450 1A2 activity, and hair pigmentation on the levels of PhIP accumulated in the hair of volunteers on a 4-week semicontrolled diet of cooked meat containing known quantities of PhIP. RESULTS: The amount of PhIP in hair increased, on average, 15-fold in light- and dark-haired individuals during consumption of cooked meat. PhIP levels in hair were correlated to PhIP intake (ρ = 0.53; P < 0.001), and the relationship was strengthened when PhIP levels were normalized for the melanin content of hair (ρ = 0.71; P < 0.001). However, PhIP accrual in hair was not correlated to cytochrome P450 1A2 activity, as assessed by the caffeine test, or to the levels of unmetabolized PhIP in urine or to the metabolic ratio of the major urinary metabolite N(2)-(β-1-glucosiduronyl-2-(hydroxyamino)-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine to unmetabolized PhIP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PhIP hair biomarker should take hair pigmentation into account for accurate exposure assessment of PhIP. IMPACT: PhIP hair levels can serve as a biomarker in epidemiologic studies investigating the association of heterocyclic aromatic amine (HAA), cooked meat, and cancer risk.
BACKGROUND: Hair is a promising tissue to assess exposure to 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), a carcinogen formed in cooked meats. However, an understanding of how dietary exposure to PhIP, cytochrome P450 1A2 activity-a key enzyme involved in PhIP metabolism, and hair pigmentation affect the level of PhIP accrued in hair is required to determine the reliability of the PhIP hair level as a biomarker of exposure to this carcinogen. METHODS: We examined the impact of PhIP exposure, cytochrome P450 1A2 activity, and hair pigmentation on the levels of PhIP accumulated in the hair of volunteers on a 4-week semicontrolled diet of cooked meat containing known quantities of PhIP. RESULTS: The amount of PhIP in hair increased, on average, 15-fold in light- and dark-haired individuals during consumption of cooked meat. PhIP levels in hair were correlated to PhIP intake (ρ = 0.53; P < 0.001), and the relationship was strengthened when PhIP levels were normalized for the melanin content of hair (ρ = 0.71; P < 0.001). However, PhIP accrual in hair was not correlated to cytochrome P450 1A2 activity, as assessed by the caffeine test, or to the levels of unmetabolized PhIP in urine or to the metabolic ratio of the major urinary metabolite N(2)-(β-1-glucosiduronyl-2-(hydroxyamino)-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine to unmetabolized PhIP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PhIP hair biomarker should take hair pigmentation into account for accurate exposure assessment of PhIP. IMPACT: PhIP hair levels can serve as a biomarker in epidemiologic studies investigating the association of heterocyclic aromatic amine (HAA), cooked meat, and cancer risk.
Authors: Sophie Langouët; Axel Paehler; Dieter H Welti; Nathalie Kerriguy; André Guillouzo; Robert J Turesky Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Jun Wang; Amit D Joshi; Román Corral; Kimberly D Siegmund; Loïc Le Marchand; Maria Elena Martinez; Robert W Haile; Dennis J Ahnen; Robert S Sandler; Peter Lance; Mariana C Stern Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Michael A Malfatti; Karen H Dingley; Susan Nowell-Kadlubar; Esther A Ubick; Nisha Mulakken; David Nelson; Nicholas P Lang; James S Felton; Kenneth W Turteltaub Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J Alexander; R Reistad; S Hegstad; H Frandsen; K Ingebrigtsen; J E Paulsen; G Becher Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Jingshu Guo; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Scott J Walmsley; Peter W Villalta; Lihua Yao; Paari Murugan; Resha Tejpaul; Christopher J Weight; Robert J Turesky Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.973
Authors: Vivek Lawana; Se Young Um; Jean-Christophe Rochet; Robert J Turesky; Jonathan H Shannahan; Jason R Cannon Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Loïc Le Marchand; Kim Yonemori; Kami K White; Adrian A Franke; Lynne R Wilkens; Robert J Turesky Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Medjda Bellamri; Yi Wang; Kim Yonemori; Kami K White; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Robert J Turesky Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Jingshu Guo; Peter W Villalta; Christopher J Weight; Radha Bonala; Francis Johnson; Thomas A Rosenquist; Robert J Turesky Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Hansong Wang; Motoki Iwasaki; Christopher A Haiman; Suminori Kono; Lynne R Wilkens; Temitope O Keku; Sonja I Berndt; Shoichiro Tsugane; Loïc Le Marchand Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Samson Okello; Emmanuel Byaruhanga; Suzan Joan Akello; Emmanuel Dwomoh; Christopher Kenneth Opio; Kathleen E Corey; Ponsiano Ocama; Jingshu Guo; Winnie R Muyindike; Robert J Turesky; David C Christiani Journal: Int J Cancer Clin Res Date: 2021-06-30