Literature DB >> 23329667

Global and pointwise rates of decay in glaucoma eyes deteriorating according to pointwise event analysis.

Nariman Nassiri1, Sasan Moghimi, Anne L Coleman, Simon K Law, Joseph Caprioli, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate rates of change in glaucoma eyes deteriorating according to pointwise event analysis (Guided Progression Analysis, GPA).
METHODS: A total of 274 eyes with six or more reliable visual fields (vf) 5 years were enrolled (baseline mean deviation [MD]: -4.2 ± 4.5 dB). Pointwise and global rates of decay from linear regression analyses were estimated up to the time of VF deterioration according to GPA or until the last follow-up visit in stable eyes. Relationship of rates of decay with time to worsening and eccentricity and agreement of global and pointwise trend analyses with GPA were explored.
RESULTS: Seventy eyes (25.5%) worsened according to GPA. A statistically significant global rate of decay (P < 0.05) was observed in 54% (MD) and 62% (visual field index) of deteriorating eyes compared to 22% and 22% in stable eyes (κ = 0.32 vs. 0.37 for agreement with GPA). Rates of decay diminished with longer time to initial worsening and were faster in points within the central 10° of fixation compared to 20° and 30° regions (P = 0.025 and 0.279, respectively). Established criteria for pointwise linear regression (PLR) detected only 31% of locations deteriorating by GPA. Less stringent PLR criteria led to improved agreement with GPA at the expense of higher false detection rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Global and pointwise rates of decay decreased with longer time to VF deterioration. The agreement between pointwise event analysis and global trend analyses was fair. Less stringent criteria for PLR led to improved agreement with GPA at the expense of higher false detection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329667     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  5 in total

1.  Baseline 24-2 Central Visual Field Damage Is Predictive of Global Progressive Field Loss.

Authors:  Aakriti Garg; C Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Incidence and long-term outcomes of the human immunodefıciency virus neuroretinal disorder in patients with AIDS.

Authors:  Douglas A Jabs; Lea Drye; Mark L Van Natta; Jennifer E Thorne; Gary N Holland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Pointwise Methods to Measure Long-term Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Diana Salazar; Esteban Morales; Alessandro Rabiolo; Vicente Capistrano; Mark Lin; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Fei Yu; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  A Method to Measure the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Lilian Mohamed; Esteban Morales; Alessandro Rabiolo; Nathaniel Sears; Hirunpatravong Pradtana; Reza Alizadeh; Fei Yu; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Anne L Coleman; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.