Literature DB >> 23329426

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves revisited.

Maiwenn J Al1.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) in 1994, its use as a method to describe uncertainty around incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) has steadily increased. In this paper, first the construction and interpretation of the CEAC is explained, both in the context of modelling studies and in the context of cost-effectiveness (CE) studies alongside clinical trials. Additionally, this paper reviews the advantages and limitations of the CEAC. Many of the perceived limitations can be attributed to the practice of interpreting the CEAC as a decision rule while it was not developed as such. It is argued that the CEAC is still a useful tool in describing and quantifying uncertainty around the ICER, especially in combination with other tools such as plots on the CE plane and value-of-information analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329426     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-012-0011-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  33 in total

1.  Incorporating option values into the economic evaluation of health care technologies.

Authors:  S Palmer; P C Smith
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  E Fenwick; K Claxton; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Briggs; A Gray
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-10

4.  Decision makers' views on health care objectives and budget constraints: results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Maiwenn J Al; Talitha Feenstra; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The CE plane: a graphic representation of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  W C Black
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  The value of implementation and the value of information: combined and uneven development.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fenwick; Karl Claxton; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Should NICE's threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? No.

Authors:  James Raftery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-26

8.  Confidence intervals for cost/effectiveness ratios.

Authors:  P Wakker; M P Klaassen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Bas Groot Koerkamp; M G Myriam Hunink; Theo Stijnen; James K Hammitt; Karen M Kuntz; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Value of information and value of implementation: application of an analytic framework to inform resource allocation decisions in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ties Hoomans; Elisabeth A L Fenwick; Steve Palmer; Karl Claxton
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  9 in total

1.  Exploring Uncertainty in Economic Evaluations of Drugs and Medical Devices: Lessons from the First Review of Manufacturers' Submissions to the French National Authority for Health.

Authors:  Salah Ghabri; Françoise F Hamers; Jean Michel Josselin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic evaluation of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Torbjørn Wisløff; Gunhild Hagen; Marianne Klemp
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France.

Authors:  Thomas Desplanches; Catherine Lejeune; Jonathan Cottenet; Paul Sagot; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-06-14

4.  The cost-effectiveness of using pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), in South African adults.

Authors:  Charles Feldman; Sipho K Dlamini; Shabir A Madhi; Susan Meiring; Anne von Gottberg; Janetta C de Beer; Margreet de Necker; Marthinus P Stander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Home Telemonitoring and a Diagnostic Algorithm in the Management of Heart Failure in the Netherlands: Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Albuquerque de Almeida; Isaac Corro Ramos; Maiwenn Al; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  RECODE: design and baseline results of a cluster randomized trial on cost-effectiveness of integrated COPD management in primary care.

Authors:  Annemarije L Kruis; Melinde R S Boland; Catharina H Schoonvelde; Willem J J Assendelft; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  e-CBT (myCompass), Antidepressant Medication, and Face-to-Face Psychological Treatment for Depression in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison.

Authors:  Daniela Solomon; Judith Proudfoot; Janine Clarke; Helen Christensen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Strengthening the evidence-base of integrated care for people with multi-morbidity in Europe using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).

Authors:  Maureen Rutten-van Mölken; Fenna Leijten; Maaike Hoedemakers; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Nick Verbeek; Milad Karimi; Roland Bal; Antoinette de Bont; Kamrul Islam; Jan Erik Askildsen; Thomas Czypionka; Markus Kraus; Mirjana Huic; János György Pitter; Verena Vogt; Jonathan Stokes; Erik Baltaxe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Dealing with Bad Risk in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: The Cost-Effectiveness Risk-Aversion Curve.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.981

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.