Literature DB >> 15312708

Decision makers' views on health care objectives and budget constraints: results from a pilot study.

Maiwenn J Al1, Talitha Feenstra, Werner B F Brouwer.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations aim to inform policy makers about the costs and effects of medical interventions to support their decisions on the allocation of health care resources. Decision makers combine information on cost-effectiveness with their preferences and with possible constraints for the allocation of health care resources. That is, decision makers need to specify an optimality criterion and all possible (budget) constraints. Usually this is a more or less implicit process. The aim of our pilot study was to find out whether decision makers consider the objectives and budget constraints we selected for a theoretical model of resource allocation relevant, and to set priorities for these objectives.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15312708     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  11 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between health and non-health investments: moving from cost-effectiveness analysis to a return on investment approach across sectors of economy.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-03-20

2.  Public funding of pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making.

Authors:  Karin H Cerri; Martin Knapp; Jose-Luis Fernandez
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-18

3.  Healthcare rationing by proxy: cost-effectiveness analysis and the misuse of the $50,000 threshold in the US.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves revisited.

Authors:  Maiwenn J Al
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Ghijben; Yuanyuan Gu; Emily Lancsar; Silva Zavarsek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-utility of long-term strontium ranelate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; O Bruyère; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Experiences of leaders in the implementation of Lean in a teaching hospital--barriers and facilitators in clinical practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kjeld Harald Aij; Frederique Elisabeth Simons; Guy A M Widdershoven; Merel Visse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.

Authors:  Zoltan Vokó; Kei Long Cheung; Judit Józwiak-Hagymásy; Silke Wolfenstetter; Teresa Jones; Celia Muñoz; Silvia M A A Evers; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Hein de Vries; Subhash Pokhrel
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-05-26

9.  Weighting Health Outcomes by Socioeconomic Position Using Stated Preferences.

Authors:  Anita Lal; Mohammad Siahpush; Marjory Moodie; Anna Peeters; Robert Carter
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-03

10.  The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada.

Authors:  Francois Dionne; Craig Mitton; Tanya Macdonald; Carol Miller; Michael Brennan
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.