Literature DB >> 23329302

Factors affecting the outcome of osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects of the knee joint: retrospective analysis of 152 cases.

Tuluhan Yunus Emre1, Tolga Ege, Ozkan Kose, Demet Tekdos Demırcıoglu, Bahadir Seyhan, Macit Uzun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results and prognostic factors affecting the outcome of osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects of the knee joint.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-two patients who underwent mosaicplasty for femoral condylar cartilage defects (modified Outerbridge classification: Grade III and IV) of the knee joint between 1998 and 2007 in our institution were included. There were 126 male and 26 female patients with a mean age of 24.8 ± 4.6 years. The average size of the lesion was 2.7 ± 0.7 cm(2). Of these patients, 33 had concomitant meniscal and/or cruciate ligament injuries which were treated simultaneously. All patients were followed up with a mean of 18.2 ± 4.2 months (range 12-24 months) using Lysholm knee score. We analyzed the relationship between the outcome variable (Lysholm knee score at the final follow-up) and the predictor variables (age, gender, lesion size, lesion grade, localization, accompanying intra-articular injuries and duration of follow-up).
RESULTS: The mean preoperative Lysholm knee score was 55.2 ± 3.6 points and increased to 88.2 ± 2.5 points at the final follow-up. There was a significant increase in Lysholm score during follow-up period (p = 0.0001). The results were excellent in 2 cases (1.3 %), good in 144 cases (94.7 %) and fair in 6 cases (3.9 %). No patients had infection, systemic complication and revision surgery. Backward regression analysis showed that age, lesion size, localization and associated intraarticular injuries are the only predictors of the final Lysholm knee score in best fit model (R (2) = 0.442, p = 0.0001). The linear regression equation was (Lysholm score at final follow-up) = 93.4 - [0.2 (age of patient) + 0.8 (lesion size) + 0.9 (localization) + 2.8 (presence of associated intraarticular injuries)].
CONCLUSIONS: Mosaicplasty is an effective technique for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee joint which restores the joint function in a short period of follow-up. Furthermore, age, lesion size, localization, and concomitant surgical interventions are major factors affecting the final outcome. The final knee score deteriorates as the age of the patient and size of the lesion increases. Furthermore, concomitant surgical interventions and lesions located on the medial femoral condyle have a negative effect on the final knee score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329302     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1680-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  12 in total

1.  Autologous osteochondral transplantation (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint: retrospective analysis of 33 cases.

Authors:  T Y Emre; Z Atbasi; D T Demircioglu; M Uzun; O Kose
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 2.  Immune modulation to improve tissue engineering outcomes for cartilage repair in the osteoarthritic joint.

Authors:  Niamh Fahy; Eric Farrell; Thomas Ritter; Aideen E Ryan; J Mary Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Michael L Redondo; Eric J Cotter
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Early determinants of long-term clinical outcome after cartilage repair surgery in the knee.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Janne Hegna; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Repair of osteochondral defects with in vitro engineered cartilage based on autologous bone marrow stromal cells in a swine model.

Authors:  Aijuan He; Lina Liu; Xusong Luo; Yu Liu; Yi Liu; Fangjun Liu; Xiaoyun Wang; Zhiyong Zhang; Wenjie Zhang; Wei Liu; Yilin Cao; Guangdong Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Restore a 9 mm diameter osteochondral defect with gene enhanced tissue engineering followed mosaicplasty in a goat model.

Authors:  Jun Sun; Xiao-Kui Hou; Yu-Xin Zheng
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Evaluation of the effects of the combination of BMP-2-modified BMSCs and PRP on cartilage defects.

Authors:  Shiqiang Ruan; Jiang Deng; Ling Yan; Wenliang Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Osteochondral Autograft Transfer Procedure: Arthroscopic Technique and Technical Pearls.

Authors:  Ryan Rowland; Michael Colello; Douglas J Wyland
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-06-11

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of Focal Cartilage Defect Treatments in Middle-Aged Versus Younger Patients.

Authors:  Ralph M Jeuken; Pieter P W van Hugten; Alex K Roth; Ufuk Tan Timur; Tim A E J Boymans; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; William D Bugbee; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-15

10.  Mosaicplasty Using Grafts From the Upper Tibiofibular Joint.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Alberto Monteiro; Hélder Pereira; Manuel Vieira da Silva; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.