Literature DB >> 23328319

Alternating-frequency TENS effects on experimental pain in healthy human participants: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Leica S Claydon1, Linda S Chesterton, Panos Barlas, Julius Sim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a modality commonly used in pain management.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the hypoalgesic effects of alternating-frequency TENS (4 Hz for 3 s/110 Hz for 3 s) on pressure pain threshold (PPT).
METHODS: Two-hundred and eight healthy, pain-free volunteers (19 to 59 y old; 104 males, 104 females) were randomized to 8 groups: 6 active TENS groups, placebo, and control (n=26 per group). Parameter combinations were such that alternating-frequency TENS was combined with different levels of intensity "low" (strong but comfortable) or "high" (strong and uncomfortable but not painful). TENS was administered either at the forearm (segmental stimulation), at the ipsilateral leg (extrasegmental stimulation), or at both sites (dual-site stimulation) for 30 minutes and monitored for 30 further minutes. PPT measurements were taken bilaterally from the mid-point of first dorsal interosseous muscle, by an independent blinded rater, at baseline and at 6 subsequent 10-minute intervals. Square-root transformed data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of covariance (baseline values and sex as covariates).
RESULTS: Alternating-frequency TENS groups did not achieve significant hypoalgesic effects compared with placebo or control (P>0.05). The largest increase in PPT (from baseline) was 76.6 kPa with low-intensity segmental alternating frequency TENS at the 20-minute stimulation time point. This change from baseline is below a difference of 100 kPa that is considered to be a clinically meaningful change in hypoalgesia. DISCUSSION: The alternating-frequency setting does not result in large hypoalgesic effects such as those previously reported using fixed-frequency TENS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328319     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318262330f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  9 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Basis of Clinical Pain Modulation.

Authors:  Daniel R Kirkpatrick; Dan M McEntire; Zakary J Hambsch; Mitchell J Kerfeld; Tyler A Smith; Mark D Reisbig; Charles F Youngblood; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09

3.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as adjunct to primary care management for tennis elbow: pragmatic randomised controlled trial (TATE trial).

Authors:  Linda S Chesterton; A Martyn Lewis; Julius Sim; Christian D Mallen; Elizabeth E Mason; Elaine M Hay; Daniëlle A van der Windt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-09-02

4.  Influence of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the threshold and pain intensity in young subjects.

Authors:  Adriana de Oliveira Gomes; Ana Caroline Silvestre; Cristina Ferreira da Silva; Mariany Ribeiro Gomes; Maria Lúcia Bonfleur; Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-09

5.  Effect of high-frequency alternating current transcutaneous stimulation over muscle strength: a controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Juan Avendaño-Coy; Cristina Simón-Martínez; Julian Taylor; Julio Gómez-Soriano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  20-kHz alternating current stimulation: effects on motor and somatosensory thresholds.

Authors:  Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Juan Avendaño-Coy; Cristina Simón-Martínez; Julian Taylor; Julio Gómez-Soriano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization on Ankle Range of Motion and Triceps Surae Pressure Pain Sensitivity.

Authors:  Corrie Myburgh; Are Hammern; Peter Mannfjord; Eleanor Boyle
Journal:  J Rehabil Med Clin Commun       Date:  2018-09-20

8.  Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Salivary Flow Rates in Normal Healthy Adults According to Gender and Age Groups.

Authors:  C Ramesh; Sharad S Sawant; Deepak R Kolte; Barun Kumar; Kosuru Kranthi; Tejal R Patil; J Suresh Babu; C Swarnalatha; Abhishek Singh Nayyar
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-09-07

9.  Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Julio Gómez-Soriano; Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban; María Vázquez-Fariñas; Julian Taylor; Juan Avendaño-Coy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.