| Literature DB >> 23327195 |
Juan Sun1, He Yi, Zhiyue Liu, Yan Wu, Jiang Bian, Yanyan Wu, Yuki Eshita, Gaimei Li, Qing Zhang, Ying Yang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies on the breakfast consumption habits of medical students in China have been carried out. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of skipping breakfast and factors associated with skipping breakfast among medical students in Inner Mongolia of China, and to assist in the design of interventions to improve breakfast consumption habits of medical college students in this region.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23327195 PMCID: PMC3562148 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Breakfast consumption prevalence among students according to demographic characteristics
| 6038 | 28.9% | |
| | | |
| Male | 1772 | 41.7% |
| Female | 4266 | 23.5% |
| | | |
| Han ethnicity | 4312 | 28.5% |
| Mongolian ethnicity | 1405 | 28.5% |
| Other ethnicity | 321 | 34.9% |
| | | |
| 1 | 2471 | 23.2% |
| 2 | 1925 | 34.1% |
| 3 | 1272 | 30.7% |
| 4 | 284 | 37.7% |
| 5 | 86 | 17.4% |
| | | |
| <300 | 467 | 19.7% |
| 300-600 | 3181 | 24.7% |
| 600-1000 | 2081 | 34.9% |
| >1000 | 293 | 46.1% |
| | | |
| City | 2249 | 30.0% |
| Rural | 3341 | 28.1% |
| Pastoral | 195 | 24.1% |
| Suburbs | 234 | 32.1% |
| | | |
| Clinical Medicine | 2191 | 26.9% |
| Public Administration and Information Management | 800 | 35.0% |
| Medicine | 949 | 35.0% |
| Traditional Chinese Medicine and Mongolian Medicine | 1023 | 22.7% |
| Other | 1075 | 28.7% |
Students’ self-perception of breakfast consumption associated factors
| | | |
| Good | 3589 | 74.3% |
| Medium | 2238 | 66.8% |
| Bad | 197 | 61.4% |
| | | |
| Good | 2421 | 73.1% |
| Medium | 3464 | 69.8% |
| Bad | 135 | 69.6% |
| | | |
| Good | 3582 | 77.0% |
| Medium | 2146 | 64.4% |
| Bad | 292 | 49.3% |
| | | |
| Good | 3216 | 75.8% |
| Medium | 2266 | 67.6% |
| Bad | 537 | 57.9% |
| | | |
| Good | 1255 | 81.4% |
| Medium | 4253 | 70.6% |
| Bad | 500 | 51.2% |
| | | |
| Good | 3682 | 73.7% |
| Medium | 2266 | 67.1% |
| Bad | 54 | 64.8% |
Logistic regression analysis of regular breakfast consumption among medical students
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| Male | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Female | 0.43 | 0.38-0.48 | | 2.20 | 1.93-2.506 | |
| | | 0.05 | | | 0.23 | |
| Han ethnicity | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Mongolian ethnicity | 1.34 | 1.06-1.71 | | 0.90 | 0.78-1.05 | |
| Other ethnicity | 1.35 | 1.04-1.74 | | 0.85 | 0.66-1.10 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| 1 | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| 2 | 0.58 | 0.51-0.67 | | 0.68 | 0.58-0.79 | |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.59-0.79 | | 0.78 | 0.66-0.94 | |
| 4 | 0.50 | 0.39-0.65 | | 0.68 | 0.50-0.91 | |
| 5 | 1.43 | 0.81-2.51 | | 1.34 | 0.74-2.43 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| <300 | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| 300-600 | 0.75 | 0.59-0.95 | | 0.82 | 0.64-1.06 | |
| 600-1000 | 0.46 | 0.36-0.59 | | 0.56 | 0.43-0.72 | |
| >1000 | 0.29 | 0.21-0.4 | | 0.36 | 0.25-0.51 | |
| | | 0.14 | | | 0.33 | |
| City | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Rural | 1.10 | 0.97-1.23 | | 0.88 | 0.77-1.01 | |
| Pastoral | 1.35 | 0.96-1.9 | | 0.99 | 0.69-1.45 | |
| Suburbs | 0.90 | 0.68-1.21 | | 0.96 | 0.70-1.30 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| Clinical Medicine | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Public Administration and Information Management | 0.68 | 0.57-0.81 | | 0.72 | 0.60-0.87 | |
| Medicine | 0.68 | 0.58-0.8 | | 0.70 | 0.58-0.84 | |
| Traditional Chinese Medicine and Mongolian Medicine | 1.25 | 1.05-1.49 | | 1.30 | 1.08-1.59 | |
| Other | 0.91 | 0.78-1.08 | | 0.61 | 0.51-0.74 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | 0.28 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.67 | 0.62-0.78 | | 0.90 | 0.79-1.03 | |
| Bad | 0.55 | 0.41-0.74 | | 0.99 | 0.69-1.45 | |
| | | 0.22 | | | 0.26 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.85 | 0.76-0.396 | | 1.08 | 0.93-1.24 | |
| Bad | 0.84 | 0.58-1.231 | | 1.40 | 0.91-2.16 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.54 | 0.48-0.61 | | 0.64 | 0.56-0.74 | |
| Bad | 0.29 | 0.23-0.37 | | 0.44 | 0.33-0.57 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.67 | 0.59-0.75 | | 0.89 | 0.78-1.02 | |
| Bad | 0.44 | 0.36-0.53 | | 0.70 | 0.56-0.86 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | <0.01 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.55 | 0.47-0.64 | | 0.67 | 0.56-0.80 | |
| Bad | 0.24 | 0.19-0.3 | | 0.40 | 0.31-0.52 | |
| | | <0.01 | | | 0.18 | |
| Good | 1.00 | reference | | 1.00 | reference | |
| Medium | 0.73 | 0.65-0.82 | | 0.88 | 0.76-1.01 | |
| Bad | 0.66 | 0.38-1.16 | 0.91 | 0.50-1.68 |
Linear-by-linear association chi-square test
| 0.32 | 0.57 | |
| 120.52 | >0.01 | |
| 93.34 | >0.01 | |
| 152.84 | >0.01 |