Literature DB >> 23326182

Identification of Bioaerosols Released from an Egg Production Facility in the Southeast United States.

Lingjuan Wang-Li1, Qianfeng Li, Grace E Byfield.   

Abstract

This field study investigated biological characteristics of aerosols emitted from a commercial egg production farm (layer operation). Bioaerosol samples were taken on this farm at five sampling locations covering emission source (inside a layer barn) and four ambient surrounding stations at four wind directions. All-glass impingers (AGI) were used for the field sampling. AGI fluid samples were plated in duplicate on Trypticase Soy Agar for growth of bacteria and Sabouraud Dextrose Agar for growth of fungi. The most prominent bacterial colony types were identified using a combination of methods that include recording characteristics of colony morphology; performing a Gram staining method and metabolic analyses using the Biolog system. Results from thirty-five AGI samples taken at the five stations through seven sampling events over four seasons indicate that there were significantly lower total bacterial concentrations in the samples collected from ambient stations as compared with the samples collected in the layer house; the mean bacterial concentration at the in-house sampling station was 3.86×10(5)±1.74×10(5) cfu/m(3), whereas the mean bacterial concentrations at four ambient stations in the vicinity of the farm ranged from 1.3×10(3) to 6.2×10(3) cfu/m(3) with no significant differences in mean among ambient stations. There were also no significant differences in fungi concentrations among all sampling stations. Mean fungi concentrations at the in-house station was 3.0×10(3)±4.45×10(3) cfu/m(3), whereas the mean concentrations at the ambient stations ranged from 7.4×10(3) to 1.7×10(4) cfu/m(3). The most prominent bacterial species differed among all five stations. Three of the most prominent bacteria from samples taken at all five stations were gram positive. Fungal type also differed from station to station.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23326182      PMCID: PMC3540896          DOI: 10.1089/ees.2011.0517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Eng Sci        ISSN: 1092-8758            Impact factor:   1.907


  14 in total

1.  Distribution of airborne bacteria in swine housing facilities and their immediate environment.

Authors:  V Bilić; B Habrun; I Barac; A Humski
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.948

2.  Microbial cross-contamination by airborne dispersion and contagion during defeathering of poultry.

Authors:  V M Allen; M H Hinton; D B Tinker; C Gibson; G C Mead; C M Wathes
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.095

3.  Bacterial plume emanating from the air surrounding swine confinement operations.

Authors:  Christopher F Green; Shawn G Gibbs; Patrick M Tarwater; Linda C Mota; Pasquale V Scarpino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Health effects from work in swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  K J Donham
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Endotoxin levels at Swine farms using different waste treatment and management technologies.

Authors:  Gwangpyo Ko; Otto D Simmons Iii; Christina A Likirdopulos; Lynn Worley-Davis; C M Williams; Mark D Sobsey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Airborne bacteria in an urban environment.

Authors:  R L Mancinelli; W A Shulls
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses.

Authors:  C W Chang; H Chung; C F Huang; H J Su
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Association of environmental air contaminants with disease and productivity in swine.

Authors:  K J Donham
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Dielectrophoretic separation of airborne microbes and dust particles using a microfluidic channel for real-time bioaerosol monitoring.

Authors:  Hui-Sung Moon; Yun-Woo Nam; Jae Chan Park; Hyo-Il Jung
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Investigation of bioaerosols released from swine farms using conventional and alternative waste treatment and management technologies.

Authors:  Gwangpyo Ko; Otto D Simmons; Christina A Likirdopulos; Lynn Worley-Davis; Mike Williams; Mark D Sobsey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correspondence Between Urban Bird Roosts and the Presence of Aerosolised Fungal Pathogens.

Authors:  Peter J Irga; Brigette Armstrong; William L King; Margaret Burchett; Fraser R Torpy
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Non-culturable bioaerosols in indoor settings: Impact on health and molecular approaches for detection.

Authors:  Pascale Blais-Lecours; Phillipa Perrott; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.798

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.