Literature DB >> 20356077

Endotoxin levels at Swine farms using different waste treatment and management technologies.

Gwangpyo Ko1, Otto D Simmons Iii, Christina A Likirdopulos, Lynn Worley-Davis, C M Williams, Mark D Sobsey.   

Abstract

Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are a major source of airborne endotoxins, which are air pollutants that can cause adverse health effects to both on-site farmers and neighbors. Release of airborne endotoxins to the environment can be reduced using proper waste treatment and management technologies. In this study, the levels of endotoxins released from two swine CAFOs using conventional lagoon-sprayfield technology were compared to those of 15 farms using various alternative waste management technologies in North Carolina. Over a 2-year period, 236 endotoxin samples were collected from the 17 farm units and analyzed using the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test. Concentrations of airborne endotoxins near barn exhaust fans were significantly higher than at the upwind boundary of the farm and at other farm sites. For most of the study sites, mean concentrations of endotoxins at the downwind boundary of the farm were higher than those at the upwind boundary of the farm, indicating the release of endotoxins from swine CAFOs to the neighboring environment. Endotoxin levels were significantly associated with concentrations of airborne bacteria but not fungi. Environmental factors, such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind velocity, affected the levels of airborne endotoxins at the farms. Based on the ratios of airborne endotoxins in downwind and upwind samples from the farm units, at least five different alternative waste management technologies significantly reduced the release of endotoxins from swine CAFOs. These results suggest that swine CAFOs are important sources of airborne endotoxins, the levels of which can be reduced by applying more robust and effective waste management technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20356077     DOI: 10.1021/es9026024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

Review 1.  Industrial Food Animal Production and Community Health.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Brent F Kim; Jesper Larsen; Lance B Price; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Field Studies Measuring the Aerosolization of Endotoxin During the Land Application of Class B Biosolids.

Authors:  R F Herrmann; R J Grosser; D Farrar; R B Brobst
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.410

4.  Identification of Bioaerosols Released from an Egg Production Facility in the Southeast United States.

Authors:  Lingjuan Wang-Li; Qianfeng Li; Grace E Byfield
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.907

5.  Estimated time-varying exposures to air emissions from animal feeding operations and childhood asthma.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Zahra Afsharinejad; Paul Sampson; Sverre Vedal; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Maria Tchong-French; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  Availability of information about airborne hazardous releases from animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Tyler J S Smith; Leonard S Rubenstein; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  A Novel Multi-Approach Protocol for the Characterization of Occupational Exposure to Organic Dust-Swine Production Case Study.

Authors:  Carla Viegas; Tiago Faria; Ana Monteiro; Liliana Aranha Caetano; Elisabete Carolino; Anita Quintal Gomes; Susana Viegas
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2017-12-27

9.  Untangling the Governance of Public Health Aspects of Manure in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Sophia Dollmann; Lucie Vermeulen; Ana Maria de Roda Husman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.