| Literature DB >> 23325098 |
Jixiang Lai1, Can Xin, Ya Zhao, Bing Feng, Congfen He, Yinmao Dong, Yun Fang, Shaomin Wei.
Abstract
Response surface methodology (RSM) using a central composite design (CCD) was employed to optimize the conditions for extraction of antioxidants from black soybean (Glycine max var) sprouts. Three influencing factors: liquid-solid ratio, period of ultrasonic assisted extraction and extraction temperature were investigated in the ultrasonic aqueous extraction. Then Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the extraction process focused on DPPH radical-scavenging capacity of the antioxidants with respect to the above influencing factors. The best combination of each significant factor was determined by RSM design and optimum pretreatment conditions for maximum radical-scavenging capacity were established to be liquid-solid ratio of 29.19:1, extraction time of 32.13 min, and extraction temperature of 30 °C. Under these conditions, 67.60% of DPPH radical-scavenging capacity was observed experimentally, similar to the theoretical prediction of 66.36%.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23325098 PMCID: PMC6269780 DOI: 10.3390/molecules18011101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The influence of extraction time on antioxidant activities of extraction.
Figure 2The influence of liquid-solid ratio on antioxidant activities of extraction.
Figure 3The influence of temperature on antioxidant activities of extraction.
Response surface analysis program and results for black beans sprout extract.
| Run | Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor3 | Clearance rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Temperature (°C) | B: Time (min) | C: liquid-solid ratio | Y: (%) | |
| 1 | 30 | 40 | 30:1 | 66.52 |
| 2 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 | 67.56 |
| 3 | 60 | 20 | 30:1 | 62.98 |
| 4 | 60 | 30 | 20:1 | 62.43 |
| 5 | 30 | 20 | 30:1 | 65.28 |
| 6 | 45 | 20 | 40:1 | 61.37 |
| 7 | 45 | 20 | 20:1 | 60.38 |
| 8 | 60 | 30 | 40:1 | 60.88 |
| 9 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 | 65.57 |
| 10 | 30 | 30 | 40:1 | 60.10 |
| 11 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 | 65.55 |
| 12 | 30 | 30 | 20:1 | 62.75 |
| 13 | 45 | 40 | 20:1 | 60.17 |
| 14 | 60 | 40 | 30:1 | 61.25 |
| 15 | 45 | 40 | 40:1 | 60.77 |
| 16 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 | 65.25 |
| 17 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 | 65.55 |
Analysis of variance for response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | DF | Mean Square | F Value | Prob > F | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 85.45 | 9 | 9.49 | 4.21 | 0.0357 | significant |
| A | 6.32 | 1 | 6.32 | 2.80 | 0.1382 | |
| B | 0.21 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.094 | 0.7685 | |
| C | 0.85 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.38 | 0.5584 | |
| A2 | 1.10 | 1 | 1.10 | 0.49 | 0.5081 | |
| B2 | 8.00 | 1 | 8.00 | 3.54 | 0.1018 | |
| C2 | 62.26 | 1 | 62.26 | 27.59 | 0.0012 | |
| AB | 2.21 | 1 | 2.21 | 0.98 | 0.3558 | |
| AC | 0.30 | 1 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.7251 | |
| BC | 0.038 | 1 | 0.038 | 0.017 | 0.9004 | |
| Residual | 15.80 | 7 | 2.26 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 12.26 | 3 | 4.09 | 4.63 | 0.0864 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 3.53 | 4 | 0.88 | |||
| Cor Total | 101.25 | 16 |
Figure 4Response surfaces and contour plots showing the effects of extraction temperature and extraction time on antioxidant activity Y = (A, B).
Figure 5Response surfaces and contour plots showing the effects of extraction temperature and liquid-solid ratio on antioxidant activity Y = (A, C).
Figure 6Response surfaces and contour plots showing the effects of extraction time and liquid-solid ratio on antioxidant activity Y = (B, C).
Factors and levels of response surface analysis.
| Levels | Independent variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 30 | 20 | 20:1 |
| 0 | 45 | 30 | 30:1 |
| 1 | 60 | 40 | 40:1 |