Literature DB >> 23324993

Comparative transcriptome analyses reveal conserved and distinct mechanisms in ovine and bovine lactation.

Mini Singh1, Peter C Thomson, Paul A Sheehy, Herman W Raadsma.   

Abstract

A combined analysis of a bovine and ovine mammary gland transcriptome from two similarly designed microarray experiments suggested a strong positive association between the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) implying that major pathways regulating the lactation process were evolutionarily conserved within the two species. Some distinct pathways identified indicate the physiological differences underlying the species. Novel techniques were established for the combined analysis of the transcriptomes of different species or heterogeneous platforms for comparative gene expression analysis allowing for greater experimental power to detect conserved pathways. Conserved DEGs were mainly related to lipid metabolism, amino acid synthesis, cell proliferation, signaling and immune systems indicating functional processes involved in the regulation of lactation including milk synthesis and lactation persistency. There were no functionally annotated DEGs that show antagonistic expression between sheep and cattle suggesting that the lactation process is essentially the same in the two species. DEGs that were found exclusively in sheep were mostly associated with gland morphogenesis while DEGs exclusively expressed in cattle, indicated that certain immune response and milk composition mechanisms were different in the bovine as compared to sheep. The conserved processes across the two species suggest the use of the ovine as a suitable model for lactation studies, considering the challenges and expense of conducting lactation physiology and genomics studies within the cow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23324993     DOI: 10.1007/s10142-012-0307-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics        ISSN: 1438-793X            Impact factor:   3.410


  61 in total

1.  Lymphatics of the rat mammary gland during virgin, pregnant, lactating and post-weaning periods.

Authors:  O Ohtani; X J Shao; M Saitoh; Y Ohtani
Journal:  Ital J Anat Embryol       Date:  1998

2.  Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence.

Authors:  Catherine J E Ingram; Charlotte A Mulcare; Yuval Itan; Mark G Thomas; Dallas M Swallow
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Annexin A8 is up-regulated during mouse mammary gland involution and predicts poor survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Torsten Stein; Karen N Price; Joanna S Morris; Victoria J Heath; Roderick K Ferrier; Alexandra K Bell; Marie-Anne Pringle; René Villadsen; Ole W Petersen; Guido Sauter; Gareth Bryson; Elizabeth A Mallon; Barry A Gusterson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Technical note: High fidelity of whole-genome amplified sheep (Ovis aries) deoxyribonucleic acid using a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array-based genotyping platform.

Authors:  D A Magee; S D E Park; E Scraggs; A M Murphy; M L Doherty; J W Kijas; D E MacHugh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Sequential microarray to identify timing of molecular responses to Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep.

Authors:  A Rowe; C Gondro; D Emery; N Sangster
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  High-resolution melting analysis using unlabeled probe and amplicon scanning simultaneously detects several lactase persistence variants.

Authors:  Jurgita Janukonyté; Else M Vestergaard; Søren A Ladefoged; Peter H Nissen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 7.  Key stages in mammary gland development. Secretory activation in the mammary gland: it's not just about milk protein synthesis!

Authors:  Steven M Anderson; Michael C Rudolph; James L McManaman; Margaret C Neville
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Gene expression profiling of mammary gland development reveals putative roles for death receptors and immune mediators in post-lactational regression.

Authors:  Richard W E Clarkson; Matthew T Wayland; Jennifer Lee; Tom Freeman; Christine J Watson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Lack of functional alpha-lactalbumin prevents involution in Cape fur seals and identifies the protein as an apoptotic milk factor in mammary gland involution.

Authors:  Julie A Sharp; Christophe Lefèvre; Kevin R Nicholas
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 10.  Key stages in mammary gland development: the cues that regulate ductal branching morphogenesis.

Authors:  Mark D Sternlicht
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Regulation of DNA methylation on EEF1D and RPL8 expression in cattle.

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Jie Yang; Qin Zhang; Li Jiang
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland.

Authors:  María Gallardo; Juan G Cárcamo; Luis Arias-Darraz; Carlos Alvear
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Understanding seasonal weight loss tolerance in dairy goats: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  José Ricardo Parreira; Lorenzo Enrique Hernández-Castellano; Anastasio Argüello; Juan Capote; Noemí Castro; Susana de Sousa Araújo; André Martinho de Almeida
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Whole transcriptome analysis of bovine mammary progenitor cells by P-Cadherin enrichment as a marker in the mammary cell hierarchy.

Authors:  E Martignani; U Ala; P A Sheehy; P C Thomson; M Baratta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.