Sean D Young1, Devan Jaganath. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. sdyoung@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to use mixed (qualitative/quantitative) methods to determine (1) the feasibility and acceptability of using online social networking to facilitate HIV-related discussions and (2) the relationship between HIV-related online discussions and requests for a home-based HIV testing kit among men who have sex with men. METHODS: Participants, primarily African American and Latino, were invited to join a "secret" group on the social networking Web site, Facebook. Peer leaders, trained in HIV prevention, posted HIV-related content. Participants were not obligated to respond to discussions or remain within the group. Participant public group conversations were qualitatively and thematically analyzed. Quantitative methods tested associations between qualitative data, participants' demographic information, and likelihood of requesting a home-based HIV testing kit. RESULTS: Latino and African American participants (n = 57) voluntarily used Facebook to discuss the following HIV-related topics (n = 485 conversations): prevention and testing, knowledge, stigma, and advocacy. Older participants more frequently discussed prevention and testing, stigma, and advocacy, although younger participants more frequently discussed HIV knowledge-related conversations. As the study progressed, the proportion of messages related to prevention and testing and HIV stigma increased. Multivariate analysis showed that participants posting about HIV prevention and testing (compared with those who did not) were significantly more likely to request an HIV testing kit (odds ratio, 11.14; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Facebook can serve as an innovative forum to increase both HIV prevention discussions and HIV testing requests among at-risk groups.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to use mixed (qualitative/quantitative) methods to determine (1) the feasibility and acceptability of using online social networking to facilitate HIV-related discussions and (2) the relationship between HIV-related online discussions and requests for a home-based HIV testing kit among men who have sex with men. METHODS:Participants, primarily African American and Latino, were invited to join a "secret" group on the social networking Web site, Facebook. Peer leaders, trained in HIV prevention, posted HIV-related content. Participants were not obligated to respond to discussions or remain within the group. Participant public group conversations were qualitatively and thematically analyzed. Quantitative methods tested associations between qualitative data, participants' demographic information, and likelihood of requesting a home-based HIV testing kit. RESULTS: Latino and African American participants (n = 57) voluntarily used Facebook to discuss the following HIV-related topics (n = 485 conversations): prevention and testing, knowledge, stigma, and advocacy. Older participants more frequently discussed prevention and testing, stigma, and advocacy, although younger participants more frequently discussed HIV knowledge-related conversations. As the study progressed, the proportion of messages related to prevention and testing and HIV stigma increased. Multivariate analysis showed that participants posting about HIV prevention and testing (compared with those who did not) were significantly more likely to request an HIV testing kit (odds ratio, 11.14; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Facebook can serve as an innovative forum to increase both HIV prevention discussions and HIV testing requests among at-risk groups.
Authors: Andre Maiorana; Susan Kegeles; Percy Fernandez; Ximena Salazar; Carlos Cáceres; Clara Sandoval; Ana María Rosasco; Thomas Coates Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2006-12-04
Authors: J A Kelly; D A Murphy; K J Sikkema; T L McAuliffe; R A Roffman; L J Solomon; R A Winett; S C Kalichman Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Judy Gold; Alisa E Pedrana; Rachel Sacks-Davis; Margaret E Hellard; Shanton Chang; Steve Howard; Louise Keogh; Jane S Hocking; Mark A Stoove Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Patrick S Sullivan; Christine M Khosropour; Nicole Luisi; Matthew Amsden; Tom Coggia; Gina M Wingood; Ralph J DiClemente Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mark S Friedman; ChingChe J Chiu; Colby Croft; Thomas E Guadamuz; Ron Stall; Michael P Marshal Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Cassie Wicken; Ama Avornu; Carl A Latkin; Melissa A Davey-Rothwell; Jim Kim; Raza Zaidi; Richard Rothman; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh Journal: J Infect Public Health Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Megan F Dickson; Michele Staton-Tindall; Kirsten E Smith; Carl Leukefeld; J Matthew Webster; Carrie B Oser Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Sean D Young; Ian Holloway; Devan Jaganath; Eric Rice; Drew Westmoreland; Thomas Coates Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308