OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with poor outcomes in perineurally invasive squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: Adults with perineural SCC diagnosed from 1998 to 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) for local recurrence, nodal metastasis, death from disease, and overall death, adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 114 cases were included, all but 2 involving unnamed nerves. Only a single local recurrence occurred in cases with no risk factors other than nerve invasion. Tumors with large nerve (≥ 0.1 mm in caliber) invasion were significantly more likely to have other risk factors, including diameters of 2 cm or greater (P<.001), invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat (P<.003), multiple nerve involvement (P<.001), infiltrative growth (P=.01), or lymphovascular invasion (P=.01). On univariate analysis, large nerve invasion was associated with increased risk of nodal metastasis (HR, 5.6 [95% CI, 1.1-27.9]) and death from disease (HR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.2-17.0]). On multivariate analysis, tumor diameter of 2 cm or greater predicted local recurrence (HR, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.8-12.7]), >1 risk factor predicted nodal metastasis (2 factors: HR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.0-16.6]), lymphovascular invasion predicted death from disease (HR, 15.3 [95% CI, 3.7-62.8]), and overall death (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.1]). Invasion beyond subcutaneous fat also predicted overall death (HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.0-4.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Squamous cell carcinoma involving unnamed small nerves (<0.1 mm in caliber) may have a low risk of poor outcomes in the absence of other risk factors. Large-caliber nerve invasion is associated with an elevated risk of nodal metastasis and death, but this is due in part to multiple other risk factors associated with large-caliber nerve invasion. A larger study is needed to estimate the specific prognostic impact of nerve caliber.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with poor outcomes in perineurally invasive squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: Adults with perineural SCC diagnosed from 1998 to 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) for local recurrence, nodal metastasis, death from disease, and overall death, adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 114 cases were included, all but 2 involving unnamed nerves. Only a single local recurrence occurred in cases with no risk factors other than nerve invasion. Tumors with large nerve (≥ 0.1 mm in caliber) invasion were significantly more likely to have other risk factors, including diameters of 2 cm or greater (P<.001), invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat (P<.003), multiple nerve involvement (P<.001), infiltrative growth (P=.01), or lymphovascular invasion (P=.01). On univariate analysis, large nerve invasion was associated with increased risk of nodal metastasis (HR, 5.6 [95% CI, 1.1-27.9]) and death from disease (HR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.2-17.0]). On multivariate analysis, tumor diameter of 2 cm or greater predicted local recurrence (HR, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.8-12.7]), >1 risk factor predicted nodal metastasis (2 factors: HR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.0-16.6]), lymphovascular invasion predicted death from disease (HR, 15.3 [95% CI, 3.7-62.8]), and overall death (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.1]). Invasion beyond subcutaneous fat also predicted overall death (HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.0-4.3]). CONCLUSIONS:Squamous cell carcinoma involving unnamed small nerves (<0.1 mm in caliber) may have a low risk of poor outcomes in the absence of other risk factors. Large-caliber nerve invasion is associated with an elevated risk of nodal metastasis and death, but this is due in part to multiple other risk factors associated with large-caliber nerve invasion. A larger study is needed to estimate the specific prognostic impact of nerve caliber.
Authors: Joana Lanz; Jan Nico Bouwes Bavinck; Marlies Westhuis; Koen D Quint; Catherine A Harwood; Shaaira Nasir; Vanessa Van-de-Velde; Charlotte M Proby; Carlos Ferrándiz; Roel E Genders; Véronique Del Marmol; Giulia Forchetti; Jürg Hafner; Domenic G Vital; Guenther F L Hofbauer Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Angiolo Gadducci; Sabina Pistolesi; Stefania Cosio; Chiara Comunale; Antonio Fanucchi; Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Pritesh S Karia; Anokhi Jambusaria-Pahlajani; David P Harrington; George F Murphy; Abrar A Qureshi; Chrysalyne D Schmults Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Flora Yan; Brittny N Tillman; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Divya Srivastava; David J Sher; Vladimir Avkshtol; Jade Homsi; Justin A Bishop; Erin M Wynings; Rebecca Lee; Larry L Myers; Andrew T Day Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Agnieszka K Thompson; Benjamin F Kelley; Larry J Prokop; M Hassan Murad; Christian L Baum Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 10.282