Literature DB >> 23324345

Inactivation of myofibroblasts during regression of liver fibrosis.

Tatiana Kisseleva, David A Brenner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatic stellate cells; inactivation into a quiescent-like phenotype; liver fibrosis; myofibroblasts; regression of liver fibrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23324345      PMCID: PMC3587431          DOI: 10.4161/cc.23549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
Myofibroblasts play a critical role in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. Hepatic fibrosis results from many chronic liver diseases, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Hepatic fibrosis is the scar caused by deregulation of physiological wound healing and results in excessive production of extracellular matrix (ECM), mostly collagen type I. Myofibroblasts, which are not present in normal liver, are the major source of the ECM during fibrogenesis. Activation and proliferation of hepatic myofibroblasts are required for the development of fibrosis. Myofibroblasts are characterized by stellate shape, expression of abundant intracellular filaments [α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), vimentin], high contractility and secretion of ECM (fibronectin, collagen type I and III). Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the major source of myofibroblasts in hepatotoxic liver fibrosis., Under physiological conditions, HSCs reside in the space of Disse and exhibit a quiescent phenotype (qHSCs). They express neural markers, such as GFAP, synemin, synaptophysin and nerve growth factor receptor p75, and store vitamin A in lipid droplets. In response to injury, qHSCs decrease vitamin A storage and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) expression and activate into collagen type I- and α-SMA-expressing myofibroblasts. Although the mechanism of HSC activation has been comprehensively studied, insights into the fate of HSCs during regression of liver fibrosis are new. Reversibility of liver fibrosis. Many studies have clearly demonstrated that hepatic fibrosis is reversible in patients (e.g., HBV, HCV, biliary obstruction or alcohol) and in experimental rodent models (alcohol feeding, CCl4 or bile duct ligation). Upon removal of the etiological source of the chronic injury, regression of liver fibrosis is associated with decreased cytokines and ECM production, increased collagenase activity, disappearance of myofibroblasts and dissolution of the fibrous scar., Only recently has the fate of these myofibroblasts been revealed. The previous concept was that the myofibroblasts undergo apoptosis on the basis of the documented senescence and apoptosis of some aHSCs during reversal of fibrosis. We, and subsequently others, have used genetic marking to demonstrate an alternative pathway in which myofibroblasts revert to a quiescent-like phenotype in CCl4-induced liver injury and experimental alcoholic liver disease. The fate of these genetically marked myofibroblasts is quantitated in experimental models of fibrosis and its reversal. Inactivation of HSCs (iHSCs). Using Cre-LoxP-based genetic labeling of myofibroblasts, we elucidated the fate of activated (a)HSCs/myofibroblasts during recovery from CCl4-induced liver fibrosis. Genetic labeling of aHSC/myofibroblasts results from crossing mice expressing Cre under control of the collagen-α1(I) enhancer/promoter (Colα1(I)Cre mice) with reporter mice (Rosa26f/f-YFP mice) ubiquitously expressing a yfp gene in which transcription is blocked by a floxed Stop cassette. In the offspring (Colα1(I)Cre-YFP mice), genetic Cre-lox recombination causes excision of the floxP-Stop-floxP sequence from genomic DNA and activation of YFP transcription in cells expressing type I collagen. Following induction of liver injury in these mice, aHSCs and their progeny are permanently labeled by YFP expression even if the cells undergo a phenotypic change. Phenotypical changes of aHSCs and the mechanism of their inactivation can now be studied during regression of liver fibrosis. Using two models of hepatotoxic-induced liver fibrosis (such as carbon-tertrachloride (CCl4) or intragastric alcohol feeding), we demonstrated that half of the myofibroblasts escape apoptosis during regression of liver fibrosis, downregulate fibrogenic genes (Col1a1, Col1a2, αSMA, TIMP1, TGFβ-RI) and acquire a phenotype similar to, but distinct from, quiescent HSCs. Inactivated HSCs acquire a novel phenotype which has not been previously described and is now referred as iHSCs. In particular, iHSCs more rapidly reactivate into myofibroblasts in response to fibrogenic stimuli and more effectively contribute to liver fibrosis. Inactivation of HSCs is associated with re-expression of lipogenic genes PPAR-γ, Insig1 and CREBP. Our findings in mice in vivo support previous in vitro studies demonstrating the importance of PPAR-γ for maintaining and re-establishing the quiescent phenotype (qHSCs)., While PPAR-γ drives HSC inactivation during reversal from liver fibrosis, Hspa1a/b, two members of Hsp70 family of heat shock proteins implicated in protection from apoptosis, appear to regulate HSC survival. Genetic ablation of Hspa1a/b renders aHSCs more susceptible to TNF-α and glyotoxin-induced apoptosis in culture, while deletion of Hspa1a/b in mice results in increased disappearance of α-SMA+Desmin+ HSCs and accelerates regression of liver fibrosis. Future prospectives. Inactivation of HSCs is a newly described phenomenon that now requires mechanistic investigation. Inactivation of aHSCs is associated with regression of liver fibrosis and is characterized by inhibition of fibrogenic gene (Col1a1, αSMA) expression and upregulation of adipogenic (PPARγ, Insig1, CEBPd) genes. Understanding of the mechanism of HSC inactivation upon cessation of fibrogenic stimuli may identify new approaches to revert already existing aHSCs/myofibroblasts into a quiescent-like state. Since reversibility of fibrosis has been reported in lungs and kidneys, these concepts and approaches may be applicable to study fibrosis of other organs and provide new targets for anti-fibrotic therapy. Figure 1. Study design to determine the cell fate of aHSCs during regression of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis. (A) Cre-loxP-based genetic labeling marks the fate of Col-α1(I)-expressing aHSCs/ myofibroblasts in Col-α1(I)Cre-YFP mice generated by crossing Col-α1(I)Cre and Rosa26f/f-YFP mice. (B) Col-α1(I)Cre-YFP mice were subjected to CCl4-induced liver injury (1.5 mo) then recuperated upon cessation of injuring agent (for 1 mo). Mice were sacrificed, and livers were analyzed for the presence of Vitamin A+ YFP+ and Vitamin A+ YFP- HSCs. (C) CCl4 induces qHSC activation into aHSCs/myofibroblasts in Col-α1(I)Cre-YFP mice. After CCl4 withdrawal, some aHSCs apoptose, while some inactivate (YFP+ iHSCs number < 100% of aHSCs).
  10 in total

Review 1.  Myofibroblast - like cells and liver fibrogenesis: Emerging concepts in a rapidly moving scenario.

Authors:  Maurizio Parola; Fabio Marra; Massimo Pinzani
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2007-10-07

2.  Adipogenic phenotype of hepatic stellate cells.

Authors:  Hide Tsukamoto
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Hepatic lipocytes: the principal collagen-producing cells of normal rat liver.

Authors:  S L Friedman; F J Roll; J Boyles; D M Bissell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of heat-shock protein protection.

Authors:  Midori A Yenari; Jialing Liu; Zhen Zheng; Zinaida S Vexler; Jong Eun Lee; Rona G Giffard
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Hepatic stellate cells and the reversal of fibrosis.

Authors:  Tatiana Kisseleva; David A Brenner
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Adipogenic transcriptional regulation of hepatic stellate cells.

Authors:  Hongyun She; Shigang Xiong; Saswati Hazra; Hidekazu Tsukamoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Deactivation of hepatic stellate cells during liver fibrosis resolution in mice.

Authors:  Juliane S Troeger; Ingmar Mederacke; Geum-Youn Gwak; Dianne H Dapito; Xueru Mu; Christine C Hsu; Jean-Philippe Pradere; Richard A Friedman; Robert F Schwabe
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ramón Bataller; David A Brenner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Mechanisms of spontaneous resolution of rat liver fibrosis. Hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and reduced hepatic expression of metalloproteinase inhibitors.

Authors:  J P Iredale; R C Benyon; J Pickering; M McCullen; M Northrop; S Pawley; C Hovell; M J Arthur
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Myofibroblasts revert to an inactive phenotype during regression of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Tatiana Kisseleva; Min Cong; Yonghan Paik; David Scholten; Chunyan Jiang; Chris Benner; Keiko Iwaisako; Thomas Moore-Morris; Brian Scott; Hidekazu Tsukamoto; Sylvia M Evans; Wolfgang Dillmann; Christopher K Glass; David A Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of animal models for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Authors:  Peter Fickert; Marion J Pollheimer; Ulrich Beuers; Carolin Lackner; Gideon Hirschfield; Chantal Housset; Verena Keitel; Christoph Schramm; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall; Tom H Karlsen; Espen Melum; Arthur Kaser; Bertus Eksteen; Mario Strazzabosco; Michael Manns; Michael Trauner
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  A hepatic stellate cell gene expression signature associated with outcomes in hepatitis C cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.

Authors:  David Y Zhang; Nicolas Goossens; Jinsheng Guo; Ming-Chao Tsai; Hsin-I Chou; Civan Altunkaynak; Angelo Sangiovanni; Massimo Iavarone; Massomo Colombo; Masahiro Kobayashi; Hiromitsu Kumada; Augusto Villanueva; Josep M Llovet; Yujin Hoshida; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Reversibility of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  David A Brenner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-11

Review 4.  Dysregulation of redox pathways in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Natalie J Torok
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 5.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression.

Authors:  Tatiana Kisseleva; David Brenner
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Reversibility of Liver Fibrosis and Inactivation of Fibrogenic Myofibroblasts.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Jun Xu; David A Brenner; Tatiana Kisseleva
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2013-09

7.  MALAT1 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to mediate Rac1 expression by sequestering miR-101b in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Fujun Yu; Zhongqiu Lu; Jing Cai; Kate Huang; Bicheng Chen; Guojun Li; Peihong Dong; Jianjian Zheng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Bone marrow-derived fibrocytes contribute to liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Tatiana Kisseleva
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-05-12

9.  Fibrogenic Signaling Is Suppressed in Hepatic Stellate Cells through Targeting of Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CCN2) by Cellular or Exosomal MicroRNA-199a-5p.

Authors:  Li Chen; Ruju Chen; Victoria M Velazquez; David R Brigstock
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 10.  Mechanisms of Fibrosis Development in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Robert F Schwabe; Ira Tabas; Utpal B Pajvani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.