M Sariyar1, A Borg, O Heidinger, K Pommerening. 1. Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. murat.sariyar@unimedizin-mainz.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We present a framework for data management processes in population-based medical registries. Existing guidelines lack the concreteness we deem necessary for them to be of practical use, especially concerning the establishment of new registries. Therefore, we propose adjustments and concretisations with regard to data quality, data privacy, data security and registry purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, we separately elaborate on the issues to be included into the framework and present proposals for their improvements. Thereafter, we provide a framework for medical registries based on quasi-standard-operation procedures. RESULTS: The main result is a concise and scientifically based framework that tries to be both broad and concrete. Within that framework, we distinguish between data acquisition, data storage and data presentation as sub-headings. We use the framework to categorise and evaluate the data management processes of a German cancer registry. DISCUSSION: The standardisation of data management processes in medical registries is important to guarantee high quality of the registered data, to enhance the realisation of purposes, to increase efficiency and to enable comparisons between registries. Our framework is destined to show how one central impediment for such standardisations - lack of practicality - can be addressed on scientific grounds.
INTRODUCTION: We present a framework for data management processes in population-based medical registries. Existing guidelines lack the concreteness we deem necessary for them to be of practical use, especially concerning the establishment of new registries. Therefore, we propose adjustments and concretisations with regard to data quality, data privacy, data security and registry purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, we separately elaborate on the issues to be included into the framework and present proposals for their improvements. Thereafter, we provide a framework for medical registries based on quasi-standard-operation procedures. RESULTS: The main result is a concise and scientifically based framework that tries to be both broad and concrete. Within that framework, we distinguish between data acquisition, data storage and data presentation as sub-headings. We use the framework to categorise and evaluate the data management processes of a German cancer registry. DISCUSSION: The standardisation of data management processes in medical registries is important to guarantee high quality of the registered data, to enhance the realisation of purposes, to increase efficiency and to enable comparisons between registries. Our framework is destined to show how one central impediment for such standardisations - lack of practicality - can be addressed on scientific grounds.
Authors: Gian Maria Zaccaria; Simone Ferrero; Samanta Rosati; Marco Ghislieri; Elisa Genuardi; Andrea Evangelista; Rebecca Sandrone; Cristina Castagneri; Daniela Barbero; Mariella Lo Schirico; Luca Arcaini; Anna Lia Molinari; Filippo Ballerini; Andres Ferreri; Paola Omedè; Alberto Zamò; Gabriella Balestra; Mario Boccadoro; Sergio Cortelazzo; Marco Ladetto Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2019-10
Authors: Crystal M Glover; Christina Creel-Bulos; Lisa M Patel; Scarlett Ellis During; Karen L Graham; Yadira Montoya; Susan Frick; Judy Phillips; Raj C Shah Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2018-11-27