Literature DB >> 23322587

Korean guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluation (second and updated version) : consensus and compromise.

Seungjin Bae1, Soook Lee, Eun Young Bae, Sunmee Jang.   

Abstract

The first version of the Korean guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluation was published by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in 2006. Since the introduction of the first version, domestic experience with the application of the recommendations has accumulated, and methodologies in certain areas have progressed considerably. Based on these experiences, HIRA initiated a guidelines revision project to address the need for revisions. The purpose of this study is to share the process used to complete these guideline revisions and to provide the contents of the revised guidelines. In developing the current revision, meetings with the advisory committee and working-level meetings with pharmaceutical companies were held several times to reach as much of a consensus as possible, and the results of a survey of pharmaceutical companies and decision makers regarding the existing guidelines were considered. The second version of the guidelines clarified the level of data requirement ('must', 'recommended', 'preferred') based on the data availability, the information needs of the decision makers and the strength of the evidence. The recommended perspective economic studies should take has been modified and additional guidance has been provided on QALY measurement. Manuals for systematic reviews and indirect comparisons have been published, and a standardized reporting format for expert opinions has been added. Sections on preferred methods for evaluations, sensitivity analysis, modelling and time horizon have been elucidated. The revised guidelines clarify the expression of the recommendations, making them more user-friendly, and provide more specific guidance to improve the quality and comparability across submissions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322587     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-012-0021-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Inconsistencies in the "societal perspective" on costs of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  D Meltzer; M Johannesson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment.

Authors:  Zoë Philips; Laura Bojke; Mark Sculpher; Karl Claxton; Su Golder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea's National Health Insurance.

Authors:  Bong-min Yang; Eun-young Bae; Jinhyun Kim
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Amid lingering questions, FDA reprieves LDL cholesterol-lowering medication.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Future costs and the future of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Alan M Garber; Charles E Phelps
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Preference-based condition-specific measures of health: what happens to cross programme comparability?

Authors:  John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Costing and perspective in published cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: mission impossible?

Authors:  J V Chancellor; D Coyle; M F Drummond
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Authors:  Dennis G Fryback; Nancy Cross Dunham; Mari Palta; Janel Hanmer; Jennifer Buechner; Dasha Cherepanov; Shani A Herrington; Ron D Hays; Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats; David Feeny; Paul Kind
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Which Criteria are Considered and How are They Evaluated in Health Technology Assessments? A Review of Methodological Guidelines Used in Western and Asian Countries.

Authors:  Yitong Wang; Tingting Qiu; Junwen Zhou; Clément Francois; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.561

2.  Sourcing quality-of-life weights obtained from previous studies: theory and reality in Korea.

Authors:  SeungJin Bae; Eun Young Bae; Sang Hee Lim
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  A Review of Utility Measurement Methods Used in Pharmacoeconomic Submissions to HIRA in South Korea: Methodological Consistency and Areas for Improvement.

Authors:  Jihyung Hong; Eun-Young Bae
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The Utility of 5 Hypothetical Health States in Heart Failure Using Time Trade-Off (TTO) and EQ-5D-5L in Korea.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Hong; Jae-Yeon Lee; Sun-Kyeong Park; Jin Hyun Nam; Hyun Jin Song; Sun-Young Park; Eui-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis.

Authors:  Kyung-Bok Son
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Preliminary investigation of economics issues in hospitalized patients with stroke.

Authors:  Zahra Tolou-Ghamari; Vahid Shaygannejad; Fariborz Khorvash
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of infant pneumococcal vaccination with PHiD-CV in Korea.

Authors:  Xu-Hao Zhang; Oscar Leeuwenkamp; Kyu-Bin Oh; Young Eun Lee; Chul-Min Kim
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Modeling lifetime costs and health outcomes attributable to secondhand smoke exposure at home among Korean adult women.

Authors:  Jiyae Lee; Ah Ram Han; Dalwoong Choi; Kyung-Min Lim; SeungJin Bae
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Relative importance of the EQ-5D five dimensions among patients with chronic diseases in South Korea - a comparison with the general population preference weights.

Authors:  Jihyung Hong
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Cost Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Compared with Trivalent Influenza Vaccines in Young Children and Older Adults in Korea.

Authors:  Yun-Kyung Kim; Joon Young Song; Hyeongap Jang; Tae Hyun Kim; Heejo Koo; Lijoy Varghese; Euna Han
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.