Literature DB >> 23322454

Policy variation in donor and recipient status in 11 pediatric renal transplantation centers.

Maike van Huis1, Nikki J Schoenmaker, Jaap W Groothoff, Johanna H van der Lee, Karlien Cransberg, Antonia H M Bouts, Laure Collard, Maria van Dyck, Nathalie Godefroid, Koenraad van Hoeck, Christina Taylan, Linda Koster-Kamphuis, Marc R Lilien, Ann Raes, Nadedja Ranguelov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric renal transplantation (Tx) are lacking. This may lead to unwanted treatment variations. We aimed to quantify the variation in treatment policies and its consequences in daily practice in 11 centers that provide renal Tx for children in three European countries.
METHODS: We surveyed Tx policies in all ten centers in the Netherlands and Belgium and one center in Germany. We compared Tx policies with the therapies actually provided and with recommendations from available published guidelines and existing literature. Information on treatment policies was obtained by a questionnaire; information on care actually provided was registered prospectively from 2007 to 2011. The clinical guidelines were identified by searches of MEDLINE and websites of pediatric nephrology organizations.
RESULTS: Between centers, we found discrepancies in policies on: the minimum accepted recipient weight (8-12 kg), the maximum living and deceased donor age (50-75 and 45-60 years, respectively). HLA-match policies varied between acceptation of all mismatches to at least 1A1B1DR match donor transplantations amounting to 49 % in the Netherlands versus 26 % in Belgium (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Management policies for renal Tx in children vary considerably between centers and nations. This has a direct impact on the delivered care, and by extrapolation, on health outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322454     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-012-2396-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  21 in total

1.  Continuing improvement in cadaver donor graft survival in North American children: the 1998 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS).

Authors:  I Elshihabi; B Chavers; L Donaldson; L Emmett; A Tejani
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2000-08

2.  Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Greg A Knoll; Tom D Blydt-Hansen; Patricia Campbell; Marcelo Cantarovich; Edward Cole; Todd Fairhead; John S Gill; Sita Gourishankar; Diane Hebert; Anthony Hodsman; Andrew A House; Atul Humar; Martin Karpinski; S Joseph Kim; Rahul Mainra; G V Ramesh Prasad
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Encouraging psychological outcomes after altruistic donation to a stranger.

Authors:  E K Massey; L W Kranenburg; W C Zuidema; G Hak; R A M Erdman; M Hilhorst; J N M Ijzermans; J J Busschbach; W Weimar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Martin G Zeier; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig; Henrik Ekberg; Catherine A Garvey; Michael D Green; Vivekanand Jha; Michelle A Josephson; Bryce A Kiberd; Henri A Kreis; Ruth A McDonald; John M Newmann; Gregorio T Obrador; Flavio G Vincenti; Michael Cheung; Amy Earley; Gowri Raman; Samuel Abariga; Martin Wagner; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  The influence of low donor age, living related donation and pre-emptive transplantation on end-organ damage based on arterial hypertension after paediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Nele Anne Heidotting; Thurid Ahlenstiel; Martin Kreuzer; Doris Franke; Lars Pape
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Outcome in emotionally related living kidney donor transplantation.

Authors:  I Binet; A H Bock; P Vogelbach; T Gasser; A Kiss; F Brunner; G Thiel
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Kidney transplantation in young children: should there be a minimum age?

Authors:  A Humar; L Arrazola; M Mauer; A J Matas; J S Najarian
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Kidney transplantation from living-unrelated donors: comparison of outcome with living-related and cadaveric transplants under current immunosuppressive protocols.

Authors:  Archil B Chkhotua; Tirza Klein; Eti Shabtai; Alexander Yussim; Nathan Bar-Nathan; Ezra Shaharabani; Shmariahu Lustig; Eytan Mor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The impact of donor age on the results of renal transplantation.

Authors:  Federico Oppenheimer; Pedro Aljama; Concepción Asensio Peinado; Jesús Bustamante Bustamante; Jose Francisco Crespo Albiach; Luis Guirado Perich
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  The relationship of donor source and age on short- and long-term allograft survival in pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  A W Dale-Shall; J M Smith; M A McBride; S R Hingorani; R A McDonald
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2009-02-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  HLA sensitisation: can it be prevented?

Authors:  Lesley Rees; Jon Jin Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.