Literature DB >> 14665344

Kidney transplantation from living-unrelated donors: comparison of outcome with living-related and cadaveric transplants under current immunosuppressive protocols.

Archil B Chkhotua1, Tirza Klein, Eti Shabtai, Alexander Yussim, Nathan Bar-Nathan, Ezra Shaharabani, Shmariahu Lustig, Eytan Mor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Living-unrelated donors may become an additional organ source for patients on the kidney waiting list. We studied the impact of a combination of calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate-mofetil together with steroids on the outcomes of living-related (LRD), unrelated (LUR), and cadaver transplantation.
METHODS: Between September 1997 and January 2000, 129 patients underwent LRD (n = 80) or LUR (n = 49) kidney transplantation, and another 173 patients received a cadaveric kidney. Immunosuppressive protocols consisted of mycophenolate-mofetil with cyclosporine-Neoral (41%) or tacrolimus (59%) plus steroids. We compared the patient and graft survival data, rejection rate, and graft functional parameters.
RESULTS: LRD recipients were younger (33.6 years) than LUR (47.8 years) and cadaver (43.7 years) donor recipients (P <0.001). HLA matching was higher in LRD patients (P <0.001). Acute rejection developed in 28.6% of LUR versus 27.5% of LRD transplants and 29.7% of cadaver kidney recipients (P = not significant). The creatinine level at 1, 2, and 3 years after transplant was 1.63, 1.73, and 1.70 mg% for LRD patients; 1.48, 1.48, and 1.32 mg% for LUR patients; and 1.75, 1.68, and 1.67 mg% for cadaver kidney recipients (P = not significant), respectively. No difference in patient survival rates was found among the groups. The 1, 2, and 3-year graft survival rates were significantly better in recipients of LRD (91.3%, 90.0%, and 87.5%, respectively) and LUR transplants (89.8%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively) than in cadaver kidney recipients (81.5%, 78.6%, 76.3%, respectively; P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite HLA disparity, the rejection and survival rates of LUR transplants under current immunosuppressive protocols are comparable to those of LRD and better than those of cadaveric transplants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14665344     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00760-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  14 in total

1.  Pregnancy-Induced Sensitization Promotes Sex Disparity in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Bianca Bromberger; Danielle Spragan; Sohaib Hashmi; Alexander Morrison; Arwin Thomasson; Susanna Nazarian; Deirdre Sawinski; Paige Porrett
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Regulated payments for living kidney donation: an empirical assessment of the ethical concerns.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Amelie Raz; Rachel Kohn; Michael Rey; David A Asch; Peter Reese
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Patterns of primary care utilization before and after living kidney donation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Alejo; Xun Luo; Allan B Massie; Macey L Henderson; Sandra R DiBrito; Jayme E Locke; Tanjala S Purnell; Brian J Boyarsky; Saad Anjum; Samantha E Halpern; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Policy variation in donor and recipient status in 11 pediatric renal transplantation centers.

Authors:  Maike van Huis; Nikki J Schoenmaker; Jaap W Groothoff; Johanna H van der Lee; Karlien Cransberg; Antonia H M Bouts; Laure Collard; Maria van Dyck; Nathalie Godefroid; Koenraad van Hoeck; Christina Taylan; Linda Koster-Kamphuis; Marc R Lilien; Ann Raes; Nadedja Ranguelov
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Growth and maturation improvement in children on renal replacement therapy over the past 20 years.

Authors:  Doris Franke; Stella Winkel; Jutta Gellermann; Uwe Querfeld; Lars Pape; Jochen H H Ehrich; Dieter Haffner; Leo Pavičić; Miroslav Zivičnjak
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Study of the effect of donor source on graft and patient survival in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Osama Gheith; Alaa Sabry; Sherief Abd El-Baset; Nabil Hassan; Hussein Sheashaa; Sameh Bahgat; El-Metwally El-Shahawy
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Aged bodies and kinship matters: The ethical field of kidney transplant.

Authors:  Sharon R Kaufman; Ann J Russ; Janet K Shim
Journal:  Am Ethnol       Date:  2006-02

Review 8.  Allograft rejection: effect of local synthesis of complement.

Authors:  Steven H Sacks; Wuding Zhou
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2005-11-11

9.  Prospective Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Emotional Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation over 6 Years.

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Jan Stygall; Juan Hui Ng; Andrew Davenport; Mike J Harrison; Stanton Newman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-07-21

10.  Is Euro-Collins better than ringer lactate in live related donor renal transplantation?

Authors:  G Siva Prasad; Chacko N Ninan; Antony Devasia; Lionel Gnanaraj; Nitin S Kekre; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.