Literature DB >> 23321171

Outcomes of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Z-Q Li1, Q-H Wang, G Chen, Z Quan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effects of treatment modality (endovascular coiling or surgical clipping) on incidence of cerebral vasospasm and infarction following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) remain controversial. This study compared outcomes between endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping to treat patients with acute (< 72 h) aSAH.
METHODS: Patients with aSAH were randomized to receive endovascular or surgical treatment. All patients underwent clinical assessments, angiography and brain computed tomography.
RESULTS: Data from 186 patients were analysed: 94 in the endovascular group and 92 in the surgical group. Demographics and severity of aSAH were comparable between the groups. Incidence of symptomatic vasospasm, cerebral infarction and complete occlusion were significantly lower in the endovascular coiling group than in the surgical clipping group. Good clinical recovery 12 months after aSAH was seen in 75.0% and 69.7% of surviving patients in the endovascular versus coiling group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, coiling yielded less symptomatic vasospasm, cerebral infarction and complete occlusion than surgical clipping, with no between-group differences in clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23321171     DOI: 10.1177/030006051204000612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  8 in total

Review 1.  Subarachnoid haemorrhage (spontaneous aneurysmal).

Authors:  Kieron Sweeney; Nicholas Silver; Mohsen Javadpour
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2016-03-17

2.  Treatment of Ruptured and Nonruptured Aneurysms Using a Semisolid Iodinated Embolic Agent.

Authors:  Zefu Zhang; Hassan Albadawi; Richard J Fowl; Izzet Altun; Marcela A Salomao; Jama Jahanyar; Brian W Chong; Joseph L Mayer; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Long-term outcomes of ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm clipping versus coiling: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nicollas Nunes Rabelo; João Paulo Mota Telles; Leonardo Zumerkorn Pipek; Louise Makarem; Antonio Luis Boechat; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.830

4.  Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia with Cerebral Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gyanendra Kumar; Oana M Dumitrascu; Chia-Chun Chiang; Cumara B O'Carroll; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Antti Lindgren; Mervyn DI Vergouwen; Irene van der Schaaf; Ale Algra; Marieke Wermer; Mike J Clarke; Gabriel Je Rinkel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-15

6.  Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Chao Peng; Yu-Hang Diao; Shi-Fei Cai; Xin-Yu Yang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 7.  Clipping versus coiling for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhu; Xiaoxiao Ling; Jindong Ding Petersen; Jinyu Liu; Anqi Xiao; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Short- and long-term outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jaume Roquer; Elisa Cuadrado-Godia; Leopoldo Guimaraens; Gerardo Conesa; Ana Rodríguez-Campello; Jaume Capellades; María P García-Arnillas; Juan L Fernández-Candil; Carla Avellaneda-Gómez; Eva Giralt-Steinhauer; Jordi Jiménez-Conde; Carolina Soriano-Tárraga; Gloria Villalba-Martínez; Rosa M Vivanco-Hidalgo; Elio Vivas; Angel Ois
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.