OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term association between midlife physical activity (PA) and lower extremity function (LEF) in late life. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with an average of 25 years of follow-up. SETTING: Community-dwelling old population in Reykjavik, Iceland. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand seven hundred fifty-three community-dwelling men and women (mean age 76 ± 6) in Reykjavik, Iceland. MEASUREMENTS: On the basis of weekly hours of regular PA reported at the midlife examination, participants were classified as active or inactive. Measures of LEF in late life were gait speed on a 6-m walk, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and knee extension (KE) strength tests. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the association. RESULTS: Participants who were active in midlife had significantly better LEF (faster gait speed, β = 0.50, P ≤ .001; faster TUG time, β = -0.53 P ≤ .001; stronger KE strength, β = 1.3, P ≤ .001) in late life than those who were not active in midlife after adjusting for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors. After adjustment for cognitive function in late life (speed of processing, memory, and executive function), participants who were active in midlife had significantly faster gait speed (β = 0.04, P ≤ .001), faster TUG time (β = -0.34, P ≤ .001), and greater KE strength (β = 0.87, P ≤ .001) in old age than those who were not active in midlife. CONCLUSION: Regular PA in midlife is associated with better performance of LEF in later life, even after controlling for late-life cognitive function.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term association between midlife physical activity (PA) and lower extremity function (LEF) in late life. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with an average of 25 years of follow-up. SETTING: Community-dwelling old population in Reykjavik, Iceland. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand seven hundred fifty-three community-dwelling men and women (mean age 76 ± 6) in Reykjavik, Iceland. MEASUREMENTS: On the basis of weekly hours of regular PA reported at the midlife examination, participants were classified as active or inactive. Measures of LEF in late life were gait speed on a 6-m walk, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and knee extension (KE) strength tests. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the association. RESULTS:Participants who were active in midlife had significantly better LEF (faster gait speed, β = 0.50, P ≤ .001; faster TUG time, β = -0.53 P ≤ .001; stronger KE strength, β = 1.3, P ≤ .001) in late life than those who were not active in midlife after adjusting for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors. After adjustment for cognitive function in late life (speed of processing, memory, and executive function), participants who were active in midlife had significantly faster gait speed (β = 0.04, P ≤ .001), faster TUG time (β = -0.34, P ≤ .001), and greater KE strength (β = 0.87, P ≤ .001) in old age than those who were not active in midlife. CONCLUSION: Regular PA in midlife is associated with better performance of LEF in later life, even after controlling for late-life cognitive function.
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Sue E Leurgans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Dennis Wallace; Julie M Chandler; Pamela W Duncan; Earl Rooney; Michael Fox; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Carlos F Mendes De Leon; Lisa L Barnes; Julie A Schneider; Julia L Bienias; Denis A Evans; David A Bennett Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Milan Chang; Palmi V Jonsson; Jon Snaedal; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Jane S Saczynski; Thor Aspelund; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Maria K Jonsdottir; Oscar L Lopez; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; María K Jónsdóttir; Melissa E Garcia; Palmi V Jonsson; Rita Peila; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Elin Olafsdottir; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen Kritchevsky; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laura H P Eggermont; William P Milberg; Lewis A Lipsitz; Erik J A Scherder; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marco Inzitari; Andrea Metti; Caterina Rosano; Cristina Udina; Laura M Pérez; Gabriela Carrizo; Joe Verghese; Anne B Newman; Stephanie Studenski; Andrea L Rosso Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Maren S Fragala; Dawn E Alley; Michelle D Shardell; Tamara B Harris; Robert R McLean; Douglas P Kiel; Peggy M Cawthon; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Maria T Vassileva; Vilmunder Gudnason; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Annemarie Koster; Anne Newman; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Suzanne Satterfield; Stephanie A Studenski; Anne M Kenny Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: B Gwen Windham; Kimystian L Harrison; Seth T Lirette; Pamela L Lutsey; Lisa A Pompeii; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Silvia Koton; Lyn M Steffen; Michael E Griswold; Thomas H Mosley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Milan Chang; Jon Snaedal; Bjorn Einarsson; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Jane S Saczynski; Thor Aspelund; Melissa Garcia; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tamara B Harris; Lenore J Launer; Palmi V Jonsson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Barbara Sternfeld; Alicia Colvin; Andrea Stewart; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Jane A Cauley; Sheila Dugan; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 4.018