Literature DB >> 23320506

Quantification of triclosan, chlorinated triclosan derivatives, and their dioxin photoproducts in lacustrine sediment cores.

Cale T Anger1, Charles Sueper, Dylan J Blumentritt, Kristopher McNeill, Daniel R Engstrom, William A Arnold.   

Abstract

When discharged into surface waters via wastewater effluents, triclosan, the antimicrobial agent in handsoaps, and chlorinated triclosan derivatives (CTDs, formed during disinfection with chlorine) react photochemically to form polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. To evaluate the historical exposure of waters to these compounds, the levels of triclosan, CTDs, and their derived dioxins were determined in sediment cores collected from wastewater-impacted Minnesota lakes. The accumulation rates and temporal trends of triclosan, CTDs, and dioxins in aquatic sediments were found to be a function of historical wastewater treatment operations and lake system scale. Cores collected from large-scale riverine systems with many wastewater sources recorded increasing concentrations of triclosan, CTDs, and their derived dioxins since the patent of triclosan in 1964. In small-scale lakes with a single wastewater source, the trends were directly attributed to increased triclosan use, local improvements in treatment, and changes in wastewater disinfection since the 1960s. In the lake with no wastewater input, no triclosan or CTDs were detected. Overall, concentrations of triclosan, CTDs, and their dioxins were higher in small-scale systems, reflecting a greater degree of wastewater impact. In cores collected in northern MN, the four dioxins derived from triclosan are present prior to the patent of triclosan, suggesting a secondary source. It is clear, however, that triclosan and CTDs are the dominant source of these congeners after 1965 in systems impacted by wastewater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23320506     DOI: 10.1021/es3045289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Degradation of triclosan in the presence of p-aminobenzoic acid under simulated sunlight irradiation.

Authors:  Pingping Zhai; Xuan Chen; Wenbo Dong; Hongjing Li; Jean-Marc Chovelon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  High efficiency removal of triclosan by structure-directing agent modified mesoporous MIL-53(Al).

Authors:  Rongni Dou; Junya Zhang; Yuancai Chen; Siyuan Feng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Using laboratory-generated biosolids to evaluate the microbial ecotoxicity of triclosan in a simulated land application scenario.

Authors:  Ryan M Holzem; Courtney M Gardner; Heather M Stapleton; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Degradation behavior of triclosan by co-exposure to chlorine dioxide and UV irradiation: influencing factors and toxicity changes.

Authors:  Qing-Song Li; Hui-Wen Cai; Guo-Xin Li; Guo-Yuan Chen; Xiao-Yan Ma; Wen-Long He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Dose-response genotoxicity of triclosan in mice: an estimate of acceptable daily intake based on organ toxicity.

Authors:  Yiyi Cao; Jing Xi; Xinyue You; Weiying Liu; Yang Luan
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Quantification of Hydroxylated Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (OH-BDEs), Triclosan, and Related Compounds in Freshwater and Coastal Systems.

Authors:  Jill F Kerrigan; Daniel R Engstrom; Donald Yee; Charles Sueper; Paul R Erickson; Matthew Grandbois; Kristopher McNeill; William A Arnold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Transformation products and human metabolites of triclocarban and triclosan in sewage sludge across the United States.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Isaac B Roll; Bruce J Brownawell; Chad A Kinney; Edward T Furlong; Dana W Kolpin; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment.

Authors:  Daniel E Carey; Patrick J McNamara
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.