PURPOSE: We investigated whether clinicians' explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias is related to black and Latino patients' perceptions of their care in established clinical relationships. METHODS: We administered a telephone survey to 2,908 patients, stratified by ethnicity/race, and randomly selected from the patient panels of 134 clinicians who had previously completed tests of explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias. Patients completed the Primary Care Assessment Survey, which addressed their clinicians' interpersonal treatment, communication, trust, and contextual knowledge. We created a composite measure of patient-centered care from the 4 subscales. RESULTS: Levels of explicit bias were low among clinicians and unrelated to patients' perceptions. Levels of implicit bias varied among clinicians, and those with greater implicit bias were rated lower in patient-centered care by their black patients as compared with a reference group of white patients (P = .04). Latino patients gave the clinicians lower ratings than did other groups (P <.0001), and this did not depend on the clinicians' implicit bias (P = .98). CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies to investigate clinicians' implicit bias and communication processes in ongoing clinical relationships. Our findings suggest that clinicians' implicit bias may jeopardize their clinical relationships with black patients, which could have negative effects on other care processes. As such, this finding supports the Institute of Medicine's suggestion that clinician bias may contribute to health disparities. Latinos' overall greater concerns about their clinicians appear to be based on aspects of care other than clinician bias.
PURPOSE: We investigated whether clinicians' explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias is related to black and Latino patients' perceptions of their care in established clinical relationships. METHODS: We administered a telephone survey to 2,908 patients, stratified by ethnicity/race, and randomly selected from the patient panels of 134 clinicians who had previously completed tests of explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias. Patients completed the Primary Care Assessment Survey, which addressed their clinicians' interpersonal treatment, communication, trust, and contextual knowledge. We created a composite measure of patient-centered care from the 4 subscales. RESULTS: Levels of explicit bias were low among clinicians and unrelated to patients' perceptions. Levels of implicit bias varied among clinicians, and those with greater implicit bias were rated lower in patient-centered care by their black patients as compared with a reference group of white patients (P = .04). Latino patients gave the clinicians lower ratings than did other groups (P <.0001), and this did not depend on the clinicians' implicit bias (P = .98). CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies to investigate clinicians' implicit bias and communication processes in ongoing clinical relationships. Our findings suggest that clinicians' implicit bias may jeopardize their clinical relationships with black patients, which could have negative effects on other care processes. As such, this finding supports the Institute of Medicine's suggestion that clinician bias may contribute to health disparities. Latinos' overall greater concerns about their clinicians appear to be based on aspects of care other than clinician bias.
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Lisa A Cooper; Lloyd E Ratner; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Tessa V West; Samuel L Gaertner; Terrance L Albrecht; Rhonda K Dailey; Tsveti Markova Journal: J Exp Soc Psychol Date: 2010-03-01
Authors: Wendy Levinson; Pamela L Hudak; Jacob J Feldman; Richard M Frankel; Alma Kuby; Sylvia Bereknyei; Clarence Braddock Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Theresa W Kim; Jeffrey H Samet; Debbie M Cheng; Michael R Winter; Dana Gelb Safran; Richard Saitz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alexander R Green; Dana R Carney; Daniel J Pallin; Long H Ngo; Kristal L Raymond; Lisa I Iezzoni; Mahzarin R Banaji Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Dominique H Como; Lucía I Floríndez; Christine F Tran; Sharon A Cermak; Leah I Stein Duker Journal: Nurs Health Sci Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 1.857
Authors: A M Cavanaugh; M J Rauh; C A Thompson; J Alcaraz; W M Mihalko; C E Bird; C B Eaton; M C Rosal; W Li; A H Shadyab; T Gilmer; A Z LaCroix Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: David H Chae; Amani M Nuru-Jeter; Nancy E Adler; Gene H Brody; Jue Lin; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Tiffani J Johnson; Daniel G Winger; Robert W Hickey; Galen E Switzer; Elizabeth Miller; Margaret B Nguyen; Richard A Saladino; Leslie R M Hausmann Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.107