OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively characterize domain-specific cognition in individuals with symptomatic lacunar stroke in a systematic review. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were conducted. Inclusion criteria were all articles published prior to December 2011 evaluating domain-specific cognitive status in individuals with a symptomatic lacunar infarct. Data extraction identified cognitive domains with reported impairment and effect size calculations and heterogeneity analyses were completed to assess the magnitude of this impairment for all studies with control group data. RESULTS: Results of the search yielded 12 cross-sectional and 5 longitudinal studies that met inclusion criteria. Effect size calculations revealed small to medium effect sizes (ES) estimations for impairment after stroke in the domains of executive function (ES -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.83, -0.50), memory (ES -0.55, 95% CI -0.96, -0.13), language (ES -0.63, 95% CI -0.92, -0.33), attention (ES -0.37, 95% CI -0.67, -0.07), and visuospatial abilities (ES -0.61, 95% CI -1.03, 0.19), and large effect sizes for global cognition (ES -0.90, 95% CI -1.48, -0.31) and information processing speed (ES -0.93, 95% CI -1.63, -0.23). Heterogeneity analyses revealed that a subset of these domains were heterogeneous and identified moderating factors accounting for this heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this systematic review are consistent with previous characterizations of cognitive impairment associated with lacunar strokes. However, impaired cognition in this stroke subtype appears less selective than previously thought, involving all major cognitive domains.
OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively characterize domain-specific cognition in individuals with symptomatic lacunar stroke in a systematic review. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were conducted. Inclusion criteria were all articles published prior to December 2011 evaluating domain-specific cognitive status in individuals with a symptomatic lacunar infarct. Data extraction identified cognitive domains with reported impairment and effect size calculations and heterogeneity analyses were completed to assess the magnitude of this impairment for all studies with control group data. RESULTS: Results of the search yielded 12 cross-sectional and 5 longitudinal studies that met inclusion criteria. Effect size calculations revealed small to medium effect sizes (ES) estimations for impairment after stroke in the domains of executive function (ES -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.83, -0.50), memory (ES -0.55, 95% CI -0.96, -0.13), language (ES -0.63, 95% CI -0.92, -0.33), attention (ES -0.37, 95% CI -0.67, -0.07), and visuospatial abilities (ES -0.61, 95% CI -1.03, 0.19), and large effect sizes for global cognition (ES -0.90, 95% CI -1.48, -0.31) and information processing speed (ES -0.93, 95% CI -1.63, -0.23). Heterogeneity analyses revealed that a subset of these domains were heterogeneous and identified moderating factors accounting for this heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this systematic review are consistent with previous characterizations of cognitive impairment associated with lacunar strokes. However, impaired cognition in this stroke subtype appears less selective than previously thought, involving all major cognitive domains.
Authors: Ciro Ramos-Estebanez; Ignacio Moral-Arce; Andres Gonzalez-Mandly; Vinoop Dhagubatti; Jesus Gonzalez-Macias; Roberto Munoz; Jose Luis Hernadez-Hernandez Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: W T Longstreth; Alice M Arnold; Norman J Beauchamp; Teri A Manolio; David Lefkowitz; Charles Jungreis; Calvin H Hirsch; Daniel H O'Leary; Curt D Furberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Vincent C Mok; Adrian Wong; Wynnie W Lam; Lawrence W Baum; Ho Keung Ng; Lawrence Wong Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Aaron M McMurtray; David L Sultzer; Lorena Monserratt; Tuty Yeo; Mario F Mendez Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Hans-Christoph Diener; Ralph L Sacco; Salim Yusuf; Daniel Cotton; Stephanie Ounpuu; William A Lawton; Yuko Palesch; Reneé H Martin; Gregory W Albers; Philip Bath; Natan Bornstein; Bernard P L Chan; Sien-Tsong Chen; Luis Cunha; Björn Dahlöf; Jacques De Keyser; Geoffrey A Donnan; Conrado Estol; Philip Gorelick; Vivian Gu; Karin Hermansson; Lutz Hilbrich; Markku Kaste; Chuanzhen Lu; Thomas Machnig; Prem Pais; Robin Roberts; Veronika Skvortsova; Philip Teal; Danilo Toni; Cam VanderMaelen; Thor Voigt; Michael Weber; Byung-Woo Yoon Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Leslie A McClure; Carole L White; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Oscar R Benavente; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lesly A Pearce; Leslie A McClure; David C Anderson; Claudia Jacova; Mukul Sharma; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Claudia Jacova; Lesly A Pearce; Ana M Roldan; Antonio Arauz; Jorge Tapia; Raymond Costello; Leslie A McClure; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Laura B Zahodne; Jennifer J Manly; Atul Narkhede; Erica Y Griffith; Charles DeCarli; Nicole S Schupf; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Rodrigo B Mansur; Danielle S Cha; Hanna O Woldeyohannes; Joanna K Soczynska; Andre Zugman; Elisa Brietzke; Roger S McIntyre Journal: Neuromolecular Med Date: 2014-06-29 Impact factor: 3.843