Lesly A Pearce1, Leslie A McClure2, David C Anderson3, Claudia Jacova4, Mukul Sharma5, Robert G Hart5, Oscar R Benavente6. 1. Biostatistics Consultant, Minot, ND, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Hennepin County Medical Center and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Division of Neurology, School of Professional Psychology, Pacific University, Hillsboro, OR, USA. 5. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: oscar.benavente@ubc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary outcome results for the SPS3 trial suggested that a lower systolic target blood pressure (<130 mm Hg) might be beneficial for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke compared with a higher target (130-149 mm Hg), but that the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin was not beneficial compared with aspirin plus placebo. In this prespecified secondary outcome analysis of the SPS3 trial, we aimed to assess whether blood pressure reduction and dual antiplatelet treatment affect changes in cognitive function over time in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. METHODS: In the SPS3 trial, patients with recent (within 6 months) symptomatic lacunar infarcts from 81 centres in North America, Latin America, and Spain were randomly assigned, in a two-by-two factorial design, to target levels of systolic blood pressure (1:1; 130-149 mm Hg vs <130 mm Hg; open-label) and to a once-daily antiplatelet treatment (1:1; aspirin 325 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg vs aspirin 325 mg plus placebo; double-blind). For this analysis, the main cognitive outcome was change in Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) during follow-up. Patients were tested annually for up to 5 years, during which time the mean difference in systolic blood pressure was 11 mm Hg (SD 16) between the two targets (138 mm Hg vs 127 mm Hg at 1 year). We used linear mixed models to compare changes in CASI Z scores over time. The SPS3 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00059306. FINDINGS: The study took place between March 23, 2003, and April 30, 2012. 2916 of 3020 SPS3 participants (mean age 63 years [SD 11]) with CASI scores at study entry were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 3·0 years (IQR 1·0-4·9). Mean changes in CASI Z scores from study entry to assessment at years 1 (n=2472), 2 (n=1968), 3 (n=1521), 4 (n=1135), and 5 (n=803) were 0·12 (SD 0·83), 0·15 (0·84), 0·16 (0·95), 0·19 (0·99), and 0·14 (1·09), respectively. Changes in CASI Z scores over time did not differ between assigned antiplatelet groups (p=0·858) or between assigned blood pressure target groups (p=0·520). There was no interaction between assigned antiplatelet groups and assigned blood pressure target groups and change over time (p=0·196). INTERPRETATION:Cognitive function is not affected by short-term dual antiplatelet treatment or blood pressure reduction in fairly young patients with recent lacunar stroke. Future studies of cognitive function after stroke should be of longer duration or focus on patients with higher rates of cognitive decline. FUNDING: US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The primary outcome results for the SPS3 trial suggested that a lower systolic target blood pressure (<130 mm Hg) might be beneficial for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke compared with a higher target (130-149 mm Hg), but that the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin was not beneficial compared with aspirin plus placebo. In this prespecified secondary outcome analysis of the SPS3 trial, we aimed to assess whether blood pressure reduction and dual antiplatelet treatment affect changes in cognitive function over time in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. METHODS: In the SPS3 trial, patients with recent (within 6 months) symptomatic lacunar infarcts from 81 centres in North America, Latin America, and Spain were randomly assigned, in a two-by-two factorial design, to target levels of systolic blood pressure (1:1; 130-149 mm Hg vs <130 mm Hg; open-label) and to a once-daily antiplatelet treatment (1:1; aspirin 325 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg vs aspirin 325 mg plus placebo; double-blind). For this analysis, the main cognitive outcome was change in Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) during follow-up. Patients were tested annually for up to 5 years, during which time the mean difference in systolic blood pressure was 11 mm Hg (SD 16) between the two targets (138 mm Hg vs 127 mm Hg at 1 year). We used linear mixed models to compare changes in CASI Z scores over time. The SPS3 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00059306. FINDINGS: The study took place between March 23, 2003, and April 30, 2012. 2916 of 3020 SPS3participants (mean age 63 years [SD 11]) with CASI scores at study entry were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 3·0 years (IQR 1·0-4·9). Mean changes in CASI Z scores from study entry to assessment at years 1 (n=2472), 2 (n=1968), 3 (n=1521), 4 (n=1135), and 5 (n=803) were 0·12 (SD 0·83), 0·15 (0·84), 0·16 (0·95), 0·19 (0·99), and 0·14 (1·09), respectively. Changes in CASI Z scores over time did not differ between assigned antiplatelet groups (p=0·858) or between assigned blood pressure target groups (p=0·520). There was no interaction between assigned antiplatelet groups and assigned blood pressure target groups and change over time (p=0·196). INTERPRETATION: Cognitive function is not affected by short-term dual antiplatelet treatment or blood pressure reduction in fairly young patients with recent lacunar stroke. Future studies of cognitive function after stroke should be of longer duration or focus on patients with higher rates of cognitive decline. FUNDING: US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Authors: I Skoog; B Lernfelt; S Landahl; B Palmertz; L A Andreasson; L Nilsson; G Persson; A Odén; A Svanborg Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-04-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Oscar R Benavente; Robert G Hart; Leslie A McClure; Jeffrey M Szychowski; Christopher S Coffey; Lesly A Pearce Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claudia Jacova; Lesly A Pearce; Raymond Costello; Leslie A McClure; Stephen L Holliday; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ruth Peters; Nigel Beckett; Francoise Forette; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Robert Clarke; Craig Ritchie; Adam Waldman; Ivan Walton; Ruth Poulter; Shuping Ma; Marius Comsa; Lisa Burch; Astrid Fletcher; Christopher Bulpitt Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Abdel Douiri; Christopher McKevitt; Eva S Emmett; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hans-Christoph Diener; Ralph L Sacco; Salim Yusuf; Daniel Cotton; Stephanie Ounpuu; William A Lawton; Yuko Palesch; Reneé H Martin; Gregory W Albers; Philip Bath; Natan Bornstein; Bernard P L Chan; Sien-Tsong Chen; Luis Cunha; Björn Dahlöf; Jacques De Keyser; Geoffrey A Donnan; Conrado Estol; Philip Gorelick; Vivian Gu; Karin Hermansson; Lutz Hilbrich; Markku Kaste; Chuanzhen Lu; Thomas Machnig; Prem Pais; Robin Roberts; Veronika Skvortsova; Philip Teal; Danilo Toni; Cam VanderMaelen; Thor Voigt; Michael Weber; Byung-Woo Yoon Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Costantino Iadecola; Kristine Yaffe; José Biller; Lisa C Bratzke; Frank M Faraci; Philip B Gorelick; Martha Gulati; Hooman Kamel; David S Knopman; Lenore J Launer; Jane S Saczynski; Sudha Seshadri; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Philip B Gorelick; Karen L Furie; Costantino Iadecola; Eric E Smith; Salina P Waddy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Hee-Joon Bae; Mary Ann Bauman; Martin Dichgans; Pamela W Duncan; Meighan Girgus; Virginia J Howard; Ronald M Lazar; Sudha Seshadri; Fernando D Testai; Stephen van Gaal; Kristine Yaffe; Hank Wasiak; Charlotte Zerna Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Manuel R Blum; Rebecca Scherzer; Jesse C Ikeme; Oscar R Benavente; Leslie A McClure; Carmen A Peralta; Michelle C Odden Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Stephen Dj Makin; Fergus N Doubal; Kirsten Shuler; Francesca M Chappell; Julie Staals; Martin S Dennis; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2018-01-08
Authors: Jackie Bosch; Martin O'Donnell; Balakumar Swaminathan; Eva Marie Lonn; Mikul Sharma; Gilles Dagenais; Rafael Diaz; Kamlesh Khunti; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Claes Held; Matyas Keltai; Christopher Reid; William D Toff; Antonio Dans; Lawrence A Leiter; Karen Sliwa; Shun Fu Lee; Janice M Pogue; Robert Hart; Salim Yusuf Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Emer R McGrath; Alexa S Beiser; Charles DeCarli; Kendra L Plourde; Ramachandran S Vasan; Steven M Greenberg; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 9.910