Literature DB >> 23318618

Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

R W D Pilling1, E Moulder, V Allgar, J Messner, Z Sun, A Mohsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of the patella during total knee replacement is an area of continuing debate. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to address the hypothesis that patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement improved patient outcome.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing patellar resurfacing with nonresurfacing in primary total knee replacement were included. The primary outcomes analyzed were knee scores, anterior knee pain, and patient satisfaction. We also investigated the prevalence of complications, revision surgery related specifically to the patellofemoral joint, the infection rate, operative time, and radiographic appearance.
RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials assessing 3465 knee replacements were eligible; 1710 procedures included patellar resurfacing and 1755 did not. The knee component of the Knee Society Score was significantly higher in the resurfacing group (p = 0.005); however, no significant difference was observed for the function component of the Knee Society Score or for any other reported knee score. Anterior knee pain was reported in 13% of resurfaced knees and in 24% of nonresurfaced knees; this difference was not significant (p = 0.1). Patients were satisfied with the outcome after 485 (90%) of 539 procedures that included patellar resurfacing compared with 488 (89%) of 548 that did not; this difference was not significant. There were ninety-three reported patellofemoral complications in the resurfacing group and 205 in the nonresurfacing group; this difference was significant (p = 0.02) in a random-effect model. The rate of reoperation because of anterior knee pain (p < 0.00001) and the rate of reoperation because of any patellofemoral complication (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the nonresurfaced group. No differences were found in the analyses of infection rate, operative time, or radiographic appearance.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent patellar resurfacing experienced anterior knee pain and satisfaction with the arthroplasty procedure that were equivalent to those experienced by patients whose patella was not resurfaced; however, these patients underwent significantly fewer additional surgical procedures. Further long-term follow-up of modern prostheses in randomized studies measuring outcome with a patella-specific score is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23318618     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  49 in total

1.  Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mo Saffarini; Guillaume Demey; Luca Nover; David Dejour
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

2.  Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arthur J Kievit; Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Keetie C A L C Kremers; Sander Koëter; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Increased in vivo patellofemoral loading after total knee arthroplasty in resurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Omer Slevin; Florian A Schmid; Filippo Schiapparelli; Helmut Rasch; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patellar Resurfacing: Does It Affect Outcomes of Distal Femoral Replacement After Distal Femoral Resection?

Authors:  Mauricio Etchebehere; Patrick P Lin; Justin E Bird; Robert L Satcher; Bryan S Moon; Jun Yu; Liang Li; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Liang Shih; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Coronal femoral TKA position significantly influences in vivo patellar loading in unresurfaced patellae after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Omer Slevin; Florian A Schmid; Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Helmut Rasch; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Should the patella be resurfaced in distal femoral replacement after distal femoral resection?

Authors:  Chun Hoi Yan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

8.  Secondary patellar resurfacing following total knee arthroplasty : A cohort study in fifty eight knees with a mean follow-up of thirty one months.

Authors:  Philip Scheurer; Inge H F Reininga; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Effect of patellar thickness on early results of total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  Qunn Jid Lee; Sze Tsun Yeung; Yiu Chung Wong; Yuk Leung Wai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Does patellofemoral congruence following total knee arthroplasty correlate with pain or function? Intraoperative arthroscopic assessment of 30 cases.

Authors:  Antoine Senioris; Mo Saffarini; Said Rahali; Louis Malekpour; Franck Dujardin; Olivier Courage
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.