Literature DB >> 11939870

Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing.

B Timothy Walsh1, Stuart N Seidman, Robyn Sysko, Madelyn Gould.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Intense debate persists about the need for placebo-controlled groups in clinical trials of medications for major depressive disorder (MDD). There is continuing interest in the development of new medications, but because effective antidepressants are already available, ethical concerns have been raised about the need for placebo groups in new trials.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the characteristics of placebo control groups in antidepressant trials have changed over time. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We searched MEDLINE and PsychLit for all controlled trials published in English between January 1981 and December 2000 in which adult outpatients with MDD were randomly assigned to receive medication or placebo. Seventy-five trials met our criteria for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from the articles by 2 of the authors and discrepancies were resolved via discussion and additional review by a third author. DATA SYNTHESIS: The mean (SD) proportion of patients in the placebo group who responded was 29.7% (8.3%) (range, 12.5%-51.8%). Most studies examined more than a single active medication, and, in the active medication group with the greatest response, the mean (SD) proportion of patients responding was 50.1% (9.0%) (range, 31.6%-70.4%). Both the proportion of patients responding to placebo and the proportion responding to medication were significantly positively correlated with the year of publication (for placebo: n = 75; r = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.61; P<.001; for medication: n = 75; r = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.03-0.46; P =.02). The association between year of publication and response rate was more statistically robust for placebo than medication.
CONCLUSIONS: The response to placebo in published trials of antidepressant medication for MDD is highly variable and often substantial and has increased significantly in recent years, as has the response to medication. These observations support the view that the inclusion of a placebo group has major scientific importance in trials of new antidepressant medications and indicate that efforts should continue to minimize the risks of such studies so that they may be conducted in an ethically acceptable manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11939870     DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.14.1840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  270 in total

1.  Consent to open label extension studies: some ethical issues.

Authors:  P Wainwright
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Trajectories of depression severity in clinical trials of duloxetine: insights into antidepressant and placebo responses.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Craig Mallinckrodt; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Should an obsessive-compulsive spectrum grouping of disorders be included in DSM-V?

Authors:  Katharine A Phillips; Dan J Stein; Scott L Rauch; Eric Hollander; Brian A Fallon; Arthur Barsky; Naomi Fineberg; David Mataix-Cols; Ygor Arzeno Ferrão; Sanjaya Saxena; Sabine Wilhelm; Megan M Kelly; Lee Anna Clark; Anthony Pinto; O Joseph Bienvenu; Joanne Farrow; James Leckman
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 5.  Applying evidence to support ethical decisions: is the placebo really powerless?.

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Nicole Schlotz-Gorton; Nikola Biller-Andorno; Anke Thim; Karin Meissner; Irmgard Roeckl-Wiedmann; Barbara Herzberger; Renatus Ziegler; Wilhelm Gaus; Ernst Pöppe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  The biochemical bases of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Raúl de la Fuente-Fernández; A Jon Stoessl
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 7.  The use of the placebo effect in clinical medicine--ethical blunder or ethical imperative?

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The efficacy of vitamins for reducing or preventing depression symptoms in healthy individuals: natural remedy or placebo?

Authors:  Alison America; Leonard S Milling
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-04

9.  A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Patrick J Brown; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Effects of major depressive disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the outcome of treatment for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Frances R Levin; Adam Bisaga; Wilfrid Raby; Efrat Aharonovich; Eric Rubin; John Mariani; Daniel J Brooks; Fatima Garawi; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.