Literature DB >> 23318311

Selective D-dimer testing for diagnosis of a first suspected episode of deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial.

Lori-Ann Linkins1, Shannon M Bates, Eddy Lang, Susan R Kahn, James D Douketis, Jim Julian, Sameer Parpia, Peter Gross, Jeffrey I Weitz, Frederick A Spencer, Agnes Y Y Lee, Martin J O'Donnell, Mark A Crowther, Howard H Chan, Wendy Lim, Sam Schulman, Jeffrey S Ginsberg, Clive Kearon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D-Dimer testing is sensitive but not specific for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Changing the use of testing and the threshold level for a positive test result on the basis of risk for DVT might improve the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity and reduce the need for testing.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether using a selective D-dimer testing strategy based on clinical pretest probability (C-PTP) for DVT is safe and reduces diagnostic testing compared with using a single D-dimer threshold for all patients.
DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Patients were allocated using a central automated system. Ultrasonographers and study adjudicators but not other study personnel were blinded to trial allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00157677)
SETTING: 5 Canadian hospitals. PATIENTS: Consecutive symptomatic patients with a first episode of suspected DVT. INTERVENTION: Selective testing (n = 860), defined as D-dimer testing for outpatients with low or moderate C-PTP (DVT excluded at D-dimer levels <1.0 µg/mL [low C-PTP] or <0.5 µg/mL [moderate C-PTP]) and venous ultrasonography without D-dimer testing for outpatients with high C-PTP and inpatients, or uniform testing (n = 863), defined as D-dimer testing for all participants (DVT excluded at D-dimer levels <0.5 µg/mL). MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of patients not diagnosed with DVT during initial testing who had symptomatic venous thromboembolism during 3-month follow-up and the proportion of patients undergoing D-dimer testing and ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 0.5% in both study groups (difference, 0.0 percentage point [95% CI, -0.8 to 0.8 percentage points]). Selective testing reduced the proportion of patients who required D-dimer testing by 21.8 percentage points (CI, 19.1 to 24.8 percentage points). It reduced the proportion who required ultrasonography by 7.6 percentage points (CI, 2.9 to 12.2 percentage points) overall and by 21.0 percentage points (CI, 14.2 to 27.6 percentage points) in outpatients with low C-PTP. LIMITATION: Results may not be generalizable to all D-dimer assays or patients with previous DVT, study personnel were not blinded, and the trial was stopped prematurely.
CONCLUSION: A selective D-dimer testing strategy seems as safe as and more efficient than having everyone undergo D-dimer testing when diagnosing a first episode of suspected DVT. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23318311     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  12 in total

1.  Thrombosis: Selective D-dimer testing improves efficiency of DVT diagnosis.

Authors:  Alexandra King
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Fluorescence immunoassay of human D-dimer in whole blood.

Authors:  Tae Kyum Kim; Sang Wook Oh; Young Joon Mok; Eui Yul Choi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Diagnosis of suspected venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  The Saudi clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of the first deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Fahad Al-Hameed; Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Abdulrahman Shamy; Abdulelah Qadi; Ebtisam Bakhsh; Essam Aboelnazar; Mohamad Abdelaal; Tarig Al Khuwaitir; Mohamed S Al-Moamary; Mohamed S Al-Hajjaj; Jan Brozek; Holger Schünemann; Reem Mustafa; Maicon Falavigna
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  Development of a pediatric-specific clinical probability tool for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Bryce A Kerlin; Julie A Stephens; Mark J Hogan; William E Smoyer; Sarah H O'Brien
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Better documentation in electronic medical records would lead to an increased use of lower extremity venous ultrasound in the inpatient setting: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Daisuke Takechi; Naoto Kuroda; Hisashi Dote; Euido Kim; Osamu Yonekawa; Takuya Watanabe; Tetsumei Urano; Yoichiro Homma
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2017-06-19

7.  Safety of a strategy combining D-dimer testing and whole-leg ultrasonography to rule out deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Synne G Fronas; Camilla T Jørgensen; Anders E A Dahm; Hilde S Wik; Jostein Gleditsch; Nezar Raouf; René Holst; F A Klok; Waleed Ghanima
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 8.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Korean Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Seung-Kee Min; Young Hwan Kim; Jin Hyun Joh; Jin Mo Kang; Ui Jun Park; Hyung-Kee Kim; Jeong-Hwan Chang; Sang Jun Park; Jang Yong Kim; Jae Ik Bae; Sun Young Choi; Chang Won Kim; Sung Il Park; Nam Yeol Yim; Yong Sun Jeon; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Ki Hyuk Park
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-09-30

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noémie Kraaijpoel; Marc Carrier; Grégoire Le Gal; Matthew D F McInnes; Jean-Paul Salameh; Trevor A McGrath; Nick van Es; David Moher; Harry R Büller; Patrick M Bossuyt; Mariska M G Leeflang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Combination of D-Dimer and Peritoneal Irritation Signs as a Potential Indicator to Exclude the Diagnosis of Intestinal Necrosis.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Wei Wang; Wei-Han Zhang; Xiao-Long Chen; Jing Zhou; Xin-Zu Chen; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.