CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation teams generally are described as consisting of a single representative of 6-8 disciplines, but research suggests that the number of individuals involved may be much larger. This study aimed to determine the size of teams in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, and the effect of team size on patients' active participation in their treatment sessions. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Six SCI rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1376 patients with traumatic SCI admitted for first rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of treatment sessions, by discipline and overall clinician rating of active participation of the patient; Treatment Concentration Index (TCI) calculated as Σp(k)(2) (where p refers to the proportion of treatment sessions delivered by team member k). RESULTS: The average patient was treated by 39.3 different clinicians. The numbers were especially high for physical therapy (mean: 8.8), occupational therapy (7.2), and nursing (16.1). TCI was 0.08 overall; it varied by discipline. TCI was negatively correlated with length of stay, except for psychology. Participation ratings were minimally affected by the number of sessions the patient and the therapist had worked together. CONCLUSIONS: In SCI rehabilitation, teams are at least as large as suggested by previous research. However, this may not mean lack of familiarity of patient and therapist with one another, or alternatively, the possibly weak therapeutic alliance does not affect the patients' active participation in their sessions. Further research is needed to determine whether there are negative effects on rehabilitation outcomes.
CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation teams generally are described as consisting of a single representative of 6-8 disciplines, but research suggests that the number of individuals involved may be much larger. This study aimed to determine the size of teams in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, and the effect of team size on patients' active participation in their treatment sessions. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Six SCI rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1376 patients with traumatic SCI admitted for first rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of treatment sessions, by discipline and overall clinician rating of active participation of the patient; Treatment Concentration Index (TCI) calculated as Σp(k)(2) (where p refers to the proportion of treatment sessions delivered by team member k). RESULTS: The average patient was treated by 39.3 different clinicians. The numbers were especially high for physical therapy (mean: 8.8), occupational therapy (7.2), and nursing (16.1). TCI was 0.08 overall; it varied by discipline. TCI was negatively correlated with length of stay, except for psychology. Participation ratings were minimally affected by the number of sessions the patient and the therapist had worked together. CONCLUSIONS: In SCI rehabilitation, teams are at least as large as suggested by previous research. However, this may not mean lack of familiarity of patient and therapist with one another, or alternatively, the possibly weak therapeutic alliance does not affect the patients' active participation in their sessions. Further research is needed to determine whether there are negative effects on rehabilitation outcomes.
Authors: Jeffrey A Alexander; Richard Lichtenstein; Kimberly Jinnett; Rebecca Wells; James Zazzali; Dawei Liu Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Joy Bailey; Marcel P Dijkers; Julie Gassaway; Jane Thomas; Patricia Lingefelt; Scott E D Kreider; Gale Whiteneck Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Kelly Johnson; Joy Bailey; Jeanine Rundquist; Patricia Dimond; Cynthia A McDonald; Ivy A Reyes; Jane Thomas; Julie Gassaway Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ronald T Seel; John D Corrigan; Marcel P Dijkers; Ryan S Barrett; Jennifer Bogner; Randall J Smout; William Garmoe; Susan D Horn Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.966