Literature DB >> 23316683

Effectiveness of three antimicrobial mouthrinses on the disinfection of toothbrushes stored in closed containers: a randomized clinical investigation by DNA Checkerboard and Culture.

Cássio do Nascimento1, Maíra Balero Sorgini, Murillo Sucena Pita, Flávio Henrique Carriço Nogueira Fernandes, Paulo Linares Calefi, Evandro Watanabe, Vinícius Pedrazzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the efficacy of three antimicrobial solutions on the disinfection of toothbrushes after storage in closed containers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy subjects were enrolled in this randomized cross-over clinical investigation. The study was conducted in four phases, in which mouthrinses (chlorhexidine gluconate-based or cetilpiridinium-based) and sterile tap water (control group) were used to individually store used toothbrushes in closed containers during 7 days of toothbrushing. Five toothbrushes were used as negative control for bacterial colonisation before contact with oral cavity. Conventional culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization were used to detect bacterial contamination on the toothbrushes. Subsequently, the number of bacterial species on the bristles was estimated by the DNA Checkerboard method.
RESULTS: One toothbrush presented bacterial contamination in the negative control test. Both culture and DNA Checkerboard showed positive signals of bacterial contamination in the toothbrushes with no differences in the frequency of detection. The control group showed higher total bacterial counts when compared with the mouthrinse groups. Porphyromonas gingivalis had the highest bacterial count followed by Parvimonas micra.
CONCLUSION: Culture and DNA Checkerboard showed positive signals of bacterial contamination. Mouthrinses that contains 0.12% of chlorhexidine gluconate were more effective in reducing bacterial colonisation on the toothbrushes.
© 2013 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; clinical trial; oral microbiology; toothbrush

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23316683     DOI: 10.1111/ger.12035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerodontology        ISSN: 0734-0664            Impact factor:   2.980


  4 in total

1.  Toothbrush microbiomes feature a meeting ground for human oral and environmental microbiota.

Authors:  Ryan A Blaustein; Lisa-Marie Michelitsch; Adam J Glawe; Hansung Lee; Stefanie Huttelmaier; Nancy Hellgeth; Sarah Ben Maamar; Erica M Hartmann
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 14.650

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacies of 0.2% Chlorhexidine and 4% Tulsi Extract in the Decontamination of Child Toothbrushes: An Observational Analytical Study.

Authors:  Lekshmy S R Nair; Anandaraj Soman; Sageena George; Deepak Jose; Shaniya Sain; Shiad Salim
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-01-29

3.  Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting Streptococcus mutans growth on toothbrush bristles.

Authors:  Dalia Mamdouh Talaat; Aly Abd El-Aziz Sharaf; Mona Abd El-Moneim Ghoneim; Soraya Ali El-Shazly; Omar Abd El Sadek El Meligy
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2018-08-04

4.  Bacterial colonization of a power-driven water flosser during regular use. A proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Pia Edlund Johansson; Corinna Bruckmann; Matthias Leonhard; Julia R Davies; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.